Cognitive Neuroscience Center, Department of Biomedical Sciences of Cells and Systems, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Tlanepantla de Baz, Estado de México, México.
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 3;17(11):e0277047. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277047. eCollection 2022.
In recent years there has been an increasing interest in understanding the role apathy plays in mediating the relationship between cognitive impairment and functional outcome. In general, most studies measure cognition with traditional cognitive tests that give explicit instructions and guide the participants toward generating a response. However, given that apathy is defined by a decrease in self-initiated behavior, it is crucial to evaluate cognition with ecological tasks that do not explicitly direct the patient´s motivation to generate behaviors to assess the actual effect. This study investigated whether an ecological cognitive assessment (the Jansari Executive Function Assessment, JEF©) would uniquely contribute to the relationship between cognition, apathy, and functional outcome in schizophrenia. The Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES), neuropsychological tests and the JEF© were administered to 20 patients with schizophrenia. Hierarchical multiple regression and mediation analysis were performed to test the associations between the variables of interest. Results showed that JEF© explained a significant portion of the variance in AES (25%). In addition, apathy explained 36% of the variance in functional outcome. However, AES did not mediate between cognition and functional outcome. Our results highlight the importance of assessing cognition with tasks that require integration of cognitive functions needed for real life demands.
近年来,人们越来越关注理解冷漠在介导认知障碍和功能结果之间关系中的作用。一般来说,大多数研究都用传统的认知测试来衡量认知,这些测试提供了明确的指导,引导参与者做出反应。然而,鉴于冷漠的定义是自我发起行为的减少,用不明确指导患者产生行为的动机的生态任务来评估认知是至关重要的,以评估实际的影响。本研究调查了生态认知评估(Jansari 执行功能评估,JEF©)是否会对精神分裂症患者的认知、冷漠和功能结果之间的关系产生独特的影响。对 20 名精神分裂症患者进行了冷漠评估量表(AES)、神经心理学测试和 JEF©的评估。进行了分层多元回归和中介分析,以检验感兴趣变量之间的关联。结果表明,JEF©解释了 AES 变异的一个显著部分(25%)。此外,冷漠解释了功能结果的 36%的变异。然而,AES 并没有在认知和功能结果之间起到中介作用。我们的研究结果强调了用需要整合现实生活需求所需的认知功能的任务来评估认知的重要性。