Department of Clinical Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China.
Department of Oncology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China.
J Med Econ. 2020 May;23(5):456-463. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1717500. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
To describe direct medical costs associated with each line of treatment among metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients in China. Electronic medical records between 2011 and 2016 were extracted from 12 tertiary hospitals in China for adult patients who initiated third-line treatment at least nine months before the end of data collection. Direct medical costs included costs of wards, diagnostic tests, surgical procedures, special materials, drugs and others. Costs were assessed by line of treatment, and drug costs were further breakdown for patients receiving chemotherapy alone and those receiving chemo- and biologics-combined therapy. Of the 404 mCRC patients, the mean age was 55 years old and 62% were male. Oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based regimens dominated first- and second-line treatment, respectively (44 and 37%). From first- to second- to third-line, the proportion of patients receiving targeted biologics increased from 18% at first-line and 12% at second-line to 34% at third-line; median number of treatment cycles reduced from 6 to 4 and to 2. The corresponding mean direct medical costs per person per cycle increased from $2,514 to $2,678 to $5,121. Mean drug costs per cycle increased from $2,314 to $2,673 to $4,316 among patients receiving chemotherapy alone and from $3,245 to $2,717 to $6,533 among patients receiving chemo- and biologics-combined therapy. Before 2017, mCRC patients in China did not receive the maximum benefits of precision medicine breakthroughs. Reduced treatment cycles and increased costs per cycle from first- to third-line suggested poor healthcare resource utilization. With earlier initiation and more treatment cycles, targeted biologics may better demonstrate their effectiveness among Chinese patients. Our findings reflected the urgent need to increase drug accessibility in China before 2017 and underscore that including innovative biologics into Chinese health insurance plans can reduce patients' economic burden and improve the management of mCRC.
描述中国转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者每一线治疗相关的直接医疗费用。从 2011 年至 2016 年,从中国 12 家三级医院提取电子病历,纳入至少在数据收集结束前 9 个月开始三线治疗的成年患者。直接医疗费用包括病房、诊断检查、手术、特殊材料、药物等费用。按治疗线评估费用,对仅接受化疗和化疗联合生物治疗的患者,药物费用进一步细分。在 404 例 mCRC 患者中,平均年龄为 55 岁,62%为男性。奥沙利铂和伊立替康为基础的方案分别占一线和二线治疗的主导地位(分别为 44%和 37%)。从一线到二线到三线,接受靶向生物制剂的患者比例从一线的 18%和二线的 12%增加到三线的 34%;每个周期的平均治疗周期数从 6 个减少到 4 个,再减少到 2 个。相应的每个周期每人的平均直接医疗费用从 2514 美元增加到 2678 美元,再增加到 5121 美元。仅接受化疗的患者每个周期的药物费用从 2314 美元增加到 2673 美元,再增加到 4316 美元,而接受化疗联合生物治疗的患者从 3245 美元增加到 2717 美元,再增加到 6533 美元。在 2017 年之前,中国的 mCRC 患者没有从精准医学突破中获得最大的收益。从一线到三线治疗周期减少和每个周期成本增加表明医疗资源利用不佳。通过更早的开始和更多的治疗周期,靶向生物制剂可能会更好地证明其在中国患者中的有效性。我们的研究结果反映了 2017 年之前中国增加药物可及性的迫切需求,并强调将创新生物制剂纳入中国医疗保险计划可以减轻患者的经济负担,并改善 mCRC 的管理。