Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Cell Biology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Computational Science and Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
FASEB J. 2020 Mar;34(3):3755-3772. doi: 10.1096/fj.201901458R. Epub 2020 Jan 19.
To date, it is unclear how fluid dynamics stimulate mechanosensory cells to induce an osteoprotective or osteodestructive response. We investigated how murine hematopoietic progenitor cells respond to 2 minutes of dynamic fluid flow stimulation with a precisely controlled sequence of fluid shear stresses. The response was quantified by measuring extracellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP), immunocytochemistry of Piezo1, and sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic Ca reticulum ATPase 2 (SERCA2), and by the ability of soluble factors produced by mechanically stimulated cells to modulate osteoclast differentiation. We rejected our initial hypothesis that peak wall shear stress rate determines the response of hematopoietic progenitor cells to dynamic fluid shear stress, as it had only a minor correlation with the abovementioned parameters. Low stimulus amplitudes corresponded to activation of Piezo1, SERCA2, low concentrations of extracellular ATP, and inhibition of osteoclastogenesis and resorption area, while high amplitudes generally corresponded to osteodestructive responses. At a given amplitude (3 Pa) and waveform (square), the duration of individual stimuli (duty cycle) showed a strong correlation with the release of ATP and osteoclast number and resorption area. Collectively, our data suggest that hematopoietic progenitor cells respond in a viscoelastic manner to loading, since a combination of high shear stress amplitude and prolonged duty cycle is needed to trigger an osteodestructive response. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: In case of painful joints or missing teeth, the current intervention is to replace them with an implant to keep a high-quality lifestyle. When exercising or chewing, the cells in the bone around the implant experience mechanical loading. This loading generally supports bone formation to strengthen the bone and prevent breaking, but can also stimulate bone loss when the mechanical loading becomes too high around orthopedic and dental implants. We still do not fully understand how cells in the bone can distinguish between mechanical loading that strengthens or weakens the bone. We cultured cells derived from the bone marrow in the laboratory to test whether the bone loss response depends on (i) how fast a mechanical load is applied (rate), (ii) how intense the mechanical load is (amplitude), or (iii) how long each individual loading stimulus is applied (duration). We mimicked mechanical loading as it occurs in the body, by applying very precisely controlled flow of fluid over the cells. We found that a mechanosensitive receptor Piezo1 was activated by a low amplitude stimulus, which usually strengthens the bone. The potential inhibitor of Piezo1, namely SERCA2, was only activated by a low amplitude stimulus. This happened regardless of the rate of application. At a constant high amplitude, a longer duration of the stimulus enhanced the bone-weakening response. Based on these results we deduce that a high loading amplitude tends to be bone weakening, and the longer this high amplitude persists, the worse it is for the bone.
迄今为止,尚不清楚流体动力学如何刺激机械敏感细胞,从而诱导出骨保护或骨破坏反应。我们研究了在精确控制的流体切应力序列下,小鼠造血祖细胞对 2 分钟动态流体流动刺激的反应。通过测量细胞外三磷酸腺苷(ATP)、Piezo1 的免疫细胞化学、肌浆/内质网 Ca 2+-ATP 酶 2(SERCA2),以及机械刺激细胞产生的可溶性因子调节破骨细胞分化的能力来定量评估反应。我们否定了最初的假设,即壁面切变率峰值决定了造血祖细胞对动态切变力的反应,因为它与上述参数只有很小的相关性。低刺激幅度对应于 Piezo1、SERCA2 的激活、细胞外低浓度 ATP 的产生以及破骨细胞生成和吸收面积的抑制,而高幅度通常对应于破骨反应。在给定的幅度(3Pa)和波形(方形)下,单个刺激的持续时间(占空比)与 ATP 的释放以及破骨细胞数量和吸收面积呈很强的相关性。总的来说,我们的数据表明,造血祖细胞对加载表现出粘弹性响应,因为需要高剪切应力幅度和延长的占空比来触发破骨反应。