The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Agricultural Economics, Sociology, and Education, 209C Ferguson Building, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
University of Florida, Department of Agricultural Education and Communication, 1200 N Park Road, Plant City, FL, 33563, USA.
Eval Program Plann. 2020 Apr;79:101768. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101768. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
Policymakers' demand for increased accountability has compelled organizations to pay more attention to internal evaluation capacity building (ECB). The existing literature about ECB has focused on capacity building experiences and organizational research, with limited attention on challenges that internal evaluation specialists face in building organizational evaluative capacity. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a Delphi study with evaluation specialists in the United States' Cooperative Extension Service and developed a consensus on the most pervasive ECB challenges as well as the most useful strategies for overcoming ECB challenges. Challenges identified in this study include limited time and resources, limited understanding of the value of evaluation, evaluation considered as an afterthought, and limited support and buy-in from administrators. Alternatively, strategies found in the study include a shift in an organizational culture where evaluation is appreciated, buy-in and support from administration, clarifying the importance of quality than quantity of evaluations, and a strategic approach to ECB. The challenges identified in this study have persisted for decades, meaning administrators must understand the persistence of these issues and make an earnest investment (financial and human resource) to make noticeable progress. The Delphi approach can be used more often to prioritize ECB efforts.
政策制定者对问责制的需求迫使组织更加关注内部评估能力建设(ECB)。现有的 ECB 文献主要关注能力建设经验和组织研究,而对内部评估专家在建立组织评估能力方面所面临的挑战关注有限。为了弥补这一知识空白,我们对美国合作推广服务中的评估专家进行了一项德尔菲研究,并就 ECB 最普遍的挑战以及克服 ECB 挑战最有用的策略达成了共识。本研究确定的挑战包括时间和资源有限、对评估价值的理解有限、将评估视为事后想法,以及来自行政管理人员的支持和认可有限。相反,研究中发现的策略包括将评估受到赞赏的组织文化转变、获得行政部门的认可和支持、明确质量比评估数量更重要、以及对 ECB 采取战略性方法。本研究中确定的挑战已经存在了几十年,这意味着行政管理人员必须了解这些问题的持续存在,并进行认真的投资(财务和人力资源),以取得显著进展。德尔菲方法可以更频繁地用于优先考虑 ECB 的努力。