Gruppen L D, Wolf F M, Van Voorhees C, Stross J K
School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Arch Intern Med. 1988 Dec;148(12):2657-63.
In an effort to examine how general vs case-related clinical experience influenced physicians' treatment decisions, four clinical case vignettes (rheumatoid arthritis, fever of undetermined origin, exercise-induced asthma, and cor pulmonale) were presented to 387 primary care physicians. For each case, physicians indicated (1) their willingness to proceed with treatment without seeking additional information, (2) their preferences for sources of supplementary information, and (3) their preferences for continued care responsibility. The results indicated that the nature of the particular vignette had a major impact on how physicians made treatment decisions. Also, having greater case-related experience and being younger led to greater willingness to proceed with treatment and preferences for continued care responsibility. Preferences for information sources were largely independent of either form of experience. Treatment decision making appears to be quite dependent on experience with similar problems and being up-to-date on current treatment procedures.
为了研究一般临床经验与病例相关临床经验如何影响医生的治疗决策,向387名初级保健医生展示了四个临床病例 vignettes(类风湿性关节炎、不明原因发热、运动诱发哮喘和肺心病)。对于每个病例,医生表明(1)他们在不寻求更多信息的情况下进行治疗的意愿,(2)他们对补充信息来源的偏好,以及(3)他们对持续护理责任的偏好。结果表明,特定病例 vignette 的性质对医生如何做出治疗决策有重大影响。此外,有更多与病例相关的经验且更年轻会导致更愿意进行治疗以及对持续护理责任的偏好。对信息来源的偏好很大程度上独立于任何一种经验形式。治疗决策似乎相当依赖于对类似问题的经验以及对当前治疗程序的了解。