Development Economics group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Knowledge, Technology and Innovation group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Jan 21;14(1):e0007666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007666. eCollection 2020 Jan.
At the height of the Ebola epidemic in Sierra Leone in November 2014, a new decentralized approach to ending infection chains was adopted. This approach was based on building local, small-scale Community Care Centres (CCC) intended to serve as triage units for safe handling of patients waiting for test results, with subsequent transfer to Ebola Treatment Centers (ETC) for those who tested positive for Ebola. This paper deals with local response to the CCC, and explains, through qualitative analysis of focus group data sets, why this development was seen in a positive light. The responses of 562 focus group participants in seven villages with CCC and seven neighbouring referral villages without CCC are assessed. These data confirm that CCC are compatible with community values concerning access to, and family care for, the sick. Mixed reactions are reported in the case of "safe burial", a process that directly challenged ritual activity seen as vital to maintaining good relations between socially-enclaved rural families. Land acquisitions to build CCC prompted divided responses. This reflects problems about land ownership unresolved since colonial times between communities and government. The study provides insights into how gaps in understanding between international Ebola responders and local communities can be bridged.
2014 年 11 月,塞拉利昂埃博拉疫情肆虐之际,一种新的、分散式的方法被用来终结感染链。该方法的基础是建立地方小规模社区关怀中心(CCC),作为对等待检测结果的病人进行安全处理的分诊单位,对于检测呈埃博拉阳性的病人,随后转移到埃博拉治疗中心(ETC)。本文探讨了对 CCC 的地方反应,并通过对焦点小组数据集的定性分析,解释了为什么这一发展被视为积极的。评估了来自七个有 CCC 的村庄和七个没有 CCC 的邻接转诊村庄的 562 名焦点小组参与者的反应。这些数据证实,CCC 符合社区对获得医疗服务和家庭护理的价值观。在“安全埋葬”方面,报告了混合反应,这是一个直接挑战仪式活动的过程,被认为是维持农村家庭良好关系的关键。为建造 CCC 而进行的土地收购引起了不同的反应。这反映了自殖民时代以来,社区和政府之间关于土地所有权的问题一直没有得到解决。该研究深入了解了如何弥合国际埃博拉应对者与当地社区之间的理解差距。