Suppr超能文献

患者报告的症状负担作为一线西妥昔单抗联合化疗治疗不可切除转移性结直肠癌的预后因素:QUACK 试验的 II 期结果。

Patient-reported symptom burden as a prognostic factor in treatment with first-line cetuximab plus chemotherapy for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: Results of Phase II QUACK trial.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Biomedical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2020 Mar;9(5):1779-1789. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2826. Epub 2020 Jan 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear whether patients' self-perceptions of symptoms at baseline clinically impact the prognostic relevance, treatment efficacy, or toxicity profiles in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with the first-line cetuximab and standard chemotherapy.

METHODS

The data were collected from a prospective trial that assessed the relationships between quality of life (QOL), treatment efficacy, and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

The analysis of 137 mCRC patients revealed a significant association between the presence of baseline tumor-related symptoms and a lower overall survival (OS) compared to the absence of symptoms (HR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.37-4.62; P = .003). The asymptomatic responders had favorable outcomes compared to the symptomatic nonresponders (2-year OS rates: 83.6% and 35.9%, respectively), while the symptomatic responders had similar outcomes to the asymptomatic nonresponders. The median postprogression survival differed significantly: 10.2 months for the symptomatic patients and 15.9 months for the asymptomatic patients (HR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.25-4.29, P = .008). The objective response rates and patient toxicity profiles were similar irrespective of the severity of baseline symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Baseline symptoms were associated with worse OS but not with impaired treatment efficacy or more frequent AEs in mCRC patients treated with cetuximab in addition to chemotherapy.

摘要

背景

目前尚不清楚转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者在接受一线西妥昔单抗联合标准化疗治疗时,基线时患者对症状的自我感知是否会对预后相关性、治疗效果或毒性特征产生临床影响。

方法

该数据来自一项前瞻性试验,评估了生活质量(QOL)、治疗效果和不良事件(AEs)之间的关系。

结果

对 137 例 mCRC 患者的分析显示,基线时存在肿瘤相关症状与无症状患者相比,总生存期(OS)明显降低(HR,2.49;95%CI,1.37-4.62;P=0.003)。无症状缓解者的预后优于有症状未缓解者(2 年 OS 率:分别为 83.6%和 35.9%),而有症状缓解者的预后与无症状未缓解者相似。无进展生存的中位时间差异显著:有症状患者为 10.2 个月,无症状患者为 15.9 个月(HR,2.29;95%CI,1.25-4.29,P=0.008)。基线症状严重程度与客观缓解率和患者毒性特征无关。

结论

基线症状与 OS 较差相关,但与 mCRC 患者接受西妥昔单抗联合化疗治疗的疗效受损或更频繁的 AE 无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验