Pires Cátia Luz, Duarte Natália, Paúl Constança, Ribeiro Oscar
Centro de Investigação em Tecnologias e Serviços de Saúde - CINTESIS. Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar. Universidade do Porto. Porto. Portugal.
Centro de Investigação em Tecnologias e Serviços de Saúde - CINTESIS Pólo Universidade de Aveiro. Departamento de Educação e Psicologia. Universidade de Aveiro. Aveiro. Portugal.
Acta Med Port. 2020 Sep 1;33(9):559-567. doi: 10.20344/amp.11922. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
From a perspective that considers the costs borne by the informal caregiver and the care-recipient, this study quantifies and values the use of health and social services, and the time dedicated to caregiving in dementia situations.
Sociodemographic information and use of services was obtained from 123 caregiving dyads. Costs with informal care were evaluated and valued considering the Health Sector (health services), Patient/Family Sector (time of caregiving) and Other Sectors (social services, continuous care, other private services). Costs with health and social services considered the paying person; the Patient/Family Sector was valued through the proxy-good method. The costs were calculated per month and the value for 100 dyads.
The total cost of informal care was €61 982.2/month per 100 dyads. The Patient/Family Sector value (€44 030.0/month) contributed with 71.0% of the total costs, Other Sectors with 20.8% (€12 887.4/month), and the Health Sector with 8.2% (€5064.8/month).
The obtained value per dyad (€619.8/month) represents 77.5% of their monthly income (median = €800.0; interquartile range = 679.0), which can limit the decision of continuing the care provision at home. Considering the values presented for this specific sample, it is estimated that the exemption of fees in the Health Sector and/or benefits in social services may contribute to a downward estimate of the costs.
Regardless of the complexity in estimating the costs associated with informal caregiving in dementia, this paper provides some insights on the burden they can represent for the family income.
从考虑非正式照料者和受照料者所承担成本的角度出发,本研究对痴呆症情况下健康和社会服务的使用以及用于照料的时间进行了量化和估值。
从123对照料二元组中获取社会人口统计学信息和服务使用情况。考虑到卫生部门(卫生服务)、患者/家庭部门(照料时间)和其他部门(社会服务、持续护理、其他私人服务),对非正式照料的成本进行了评估和估值。卫生和社会服务的成本考虑了付费方;患者/家庭部门通过替代商品法进行估值。成本按每月计算,并得出100对二元组的价值。
每100对二元组的非正式照料总成本为每月61982.2欧元。患者/家庭部门的价值(每月44030.0欧元)占总成本的71.0%,其他部门占20.8%(每月12887.4欧元),卫生部门占8.2%(每月5064.8欧元)。
每个二元组获得的价值(每月619.8欧元)占其月收入的77.5%(中位数 = 800.0欧元;四分位间距 = 679.0欧元),这可能会限制在家继续提供照料的决定。考虑到该特定样本呈现的值,估计卫生部门的费用豁免和/或社会服务福利可能会导致成本估计值下降。
尽管估计痴呆症非正式照料相关成本存在复杂性,但本文提供了一些关于它们对家庭收入可能造成负担的见解。