• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实现患者参与。

Making Patient Engagement a Reality.

机构信息

UCB Celltech, Slough, Berkshire, UK.

出版信息

Patient. 2018 Feb;11(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0264-6.

DOI:10.1007/s40271-017-0264-6
PMID:28741235
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5766722/
Abstract

Patients are increasingly recognised as the true customers of healthcare. By providing insights and perspectives, patients can help the wider healthcare community better understand their needs and ultimately enhance the value of healthcare solutions being developed. In the development of new medicines, for example, meaningful patient engagement can enable the pharmaceutical industry, healthcare providers and other stakeholders to achieve more meaningful health outcomes. While both the pharmaceutical industry and regulators have achieved some progress in incorporating patient perspectives into their activities, the lack of standardised best practices and metrics has made it challenging to achieve consistency and measure success in patient engagement. Practical guidance for patient engagement can facilitate better interactions between patients or patient groups and other collaborators, e.g. industry, regulators and other healthcare stakeholders. Accordingly, UCB has developed an internal model for Patient Group Engagement incorporating four key principles, based on shared ambition, transparency, accountability and respect, essential for effective collaborations.

摘要

患者越来越被视为医疗保健的真正客户。通过提供见解和观点,患者可以帮助更广泛的医疗保健社区更好地了解他们的需求,并最终提高正在开发的医疗保健解决方案的价值。例如,在新药开发中,有意义的患者参与可以使制药行业、医疗保健提供者和其他利益相关者实现更有意义的健康结果。虽然制药行业和监管机构在将患者观点纳入其活动方面都取得了一些进展,但缺乏标准化的最佳实践和指标使得在患者参与方面实现一致性和衡量成功变得具有挑战性。患者参与的实用指南可以促进患者或患者群体与其他合作者(如行业、监管机构和其他医疗保健利益相关者)之间更好的互动。因此,UCB 基于共同的目标、透明度、问责制和尊重这四个关键原则,制定了内部患者群体参与模型,这对于有效的合作至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed46/5766722/3c185e2a23f5/40271_2017_264_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed46/5766722/dc91fa5ae30d/40271_2017_264_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed46/5766722/cc3acbd4ec90/40271_2017_264_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed46/5766722/3c185e2a23f5/40271_2017_264_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed46/5766722/dc91fa5ae30d/40271_2017_264_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed46/5766722/cc3acbd4ec90/40271_2017_264_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed46/5766722/3c185e2a23f5/40271_2017_264_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Making Patient Engagement a Reality.实现患者参与。
Patient. 2018 Feb;11(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0264-6.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
4
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
5
What do stakeholders expect from patient engagement: Are these expectations being met?利益相关者对患者参与有哪些期望:这些期望得到满足了吗?
Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):1035-1045. doi: 10.1111/hex.12797. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
6
EUPATI Guidance for Patient Involvement in Medicines Research and Development (R&D); Guidance for Pharmaceutical Industry-Led Medicines R&D.EUPATI患者参与药物研发(R&D)指南;制药行业主导的药物研发指南。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Oct 9;5:270. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00270. eCollection 2018.
7
The Rules of Engagement: CTTI Recommendations for Successful Collaborations Between Sponsors and Patient Groups Around Clinical Trials.参与规则:CTTI 关于申办方与患者群体围绕临床试验开展成功合作的建议
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018 Mar;52(2):206-213. doi: 10.1177/2168479017720247. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
8
Qualitative analysis of US Department of veterans affairs mental health clinician perspectives on patient-centered care.美国退伍军人事务部心理健康临床医生对以患者为中心护理的观点的定性分析
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Jun;28(3):355-62. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw028. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
9
Improving Cardiovascular Drug and Device Development and Evidence Through Patient-Centered Research and Clinical Trials: A Call to Action From the Value in Healthcare Initiative's Partnering With Regulators Learning Collaborative.通过以患者为中心的研究和临床试验改善心血管药物和器械的研发及证据:医疗保健价值倡议组织与监管机构合作学习协作组的行动呼吁。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Jul;13(7):e006606. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006606. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
10
The PCORI Engagement Rubric: Promising Practices for Partnering in Research.患者为中心的结果研究所参与度评分标准:研究合作的成功实践
Ann Fam Med. 2017 Mar;15(2):165-170. doi: 10.1370/afm.2042.

引用本文的文献

1
Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Reducing Surgical Site Infections: An Evidence-Based Literature Review.预防性负压伤口治疗对减少手术部位感染的作用:一项基于证据的文献综述
SAGE Open Nurs. 2024 Oct 29;10:23779608241292839. doi: 10.1177/23779608241292839. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Patient engagement in multimorbidity: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures.患者对多种疾病的参与度:对患者报告结局指标的系统评价
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 17;15:1345117. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1345117. eCollection 2024.
3
Evaluation of a knowledge-attitude-practice model based narrative life education program for community-dwelling older adults: a mixed-methods feasibility study.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient Engagement by Pharma-Why and How? A Framework for Compliant Patient Engagement.制药公司推动患者参与——为何及如何?合规患者参与框架。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2015 Jan;49(1):9-16. doi: 10.1177/2168479014558884.
2
Value of Developing Plain Language Summaries of Scientific and Clinical Articles: A Survey of Patients and Physicians.撰写科学与临床文章的简明语言摘要的价值:一项针对患者和医生的调查
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018 Jul;52(4):474-481. doi: 10.1177/2168479017738723. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
3
Chronic Disease and Self-Injection: Ethnographic Investigations into the Patient Experience During Treatment.
基于知识-态度-实践模式的叙事生活教育方案对社区老年人的评估:一项混合方法可行性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jun 24;24(1):547. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05153-4.
4
Listen to the patients! Identifying CML patients' needs analyzing patient-generated content with AI-driven methodologies.倾听患者的声音!利用人工智能驱动的方法识别慢性粒细胞白血病患者的需求并分析患者生成的内容。
Front Digit Health. 2023 Dec 5;5:1243215. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1243215. eCollection 2023.
5
Patient Engagement and Patient Experience Data in Regulatory Review and Health Technology Assessment: A Global Landscape Review.监管审查和卫生技术评估中的患者参与和患者体验数据:全球概况综述。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 Jan;58(1):63-78. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00573-7. Epub 2023 Sep 24.
6
A global neuronopathic gaucher disease registry (GARDIAN): a patient-led initiative.全球神经病变戈谢病登记处(GARDIAN):一项患者主导的倡议。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023 Jul 21;18(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s13023-023-02828-w.
7
A Systematic Review of Patient Engagement Experiences in Brain Disorders.脑疾病患者参与体验的系统评价
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2022 Dec 13;13:259-272. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S256396. eCollection 2022.
8
Mobile Health Apps for Patient-Centered Care: Review of United States Rheumatoid Arthritis Apps for Engagement and Activation.移动医疗应用程序在以患者为中心的医疗护理中的应用:美国类风湿关节炎患者互动和参与的应用程序评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Dec 5;10(12):e39881. doi: 10.2196/39881.
9
From Testers to Cocreators-the Value of and Approaches to Successful Patient Engagement in the Development of eHealth Solutions: Qualitative Expert Interview Study.从测试者到共同创造者——电子健康解决方案开发中患者成功参与的价值与方法:定性专家访谈研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Oct 6;9(4):e41481. doi: 10.2196/41481.
10
Practices of patient engagement in drug development: a systematic scoping review.患者参与药物研发的实践:一项系统的范围综述。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Jun 29;8(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00364-8.
慢性病与自我注射:治疗期间患者体验的人种志调查
Rheumatol Ther. 2017 Dec;4(2):445-463. doi: 10.1007/s40744-017-0080-4. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
4
Emerging Guidelines for Patient Engagement in Research.患者参与研究的新兴指南。
Value Health. 2017 Mar;20(3):481-486. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
5
Successful Stepwise Development of Patient Research Partnership: 14 Years' Experience of Actions and Consequences in Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT).患者研究伙伴关系的成功逐步发展:风湿病学疗效指标(OMERACT)14年的行动与结果经验
Patient. 2017 Apr;10(2):141-152. doi: 10.1007/s40271-016-0198-4.
6
Partnering With Patients in the Development and Lifecycle of Medicines: A Call for Action.在药物研发及生命周期中与患者合作:行动呼吁
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2015 Nov;49(6):929-939. doi: 10.1177/2168479015580384.
7
Patient Involvement in the Design of a Patient-Centered Clinical Trial to Promote Adherence to Supplemental Oxygen Therapy in COPD.患者参与以患者为中心的临床试验设计,以促进慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者坚持补充氧气治疗。
Patient. 2016 Jun;9(3):271-9. doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0150-z.
8
Improving health outcomes with better patient understanding and education.通过更好地了解和教育患者来改善健康结果。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2010;3:61-72. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S7500. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
9
Public policy approaches to the prevention of heart disease and stroke.预防心脏病和中风的公共政策方法。
Circulation. 2011 Dec 6;124(23):2560-71. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.968743.
10
Ten great public health achievements--United States, 2001-2010.十个重大公共卫生成就——美国,2001-2010 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 May 20;60(19):619-23.