• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠癌筛查计划改善了短期和长期预后:的里雅斯特的单中心经验。

Colorectal cancer-screening program improves both short- and long-term outcomes: a single-center experience in Trieste.

机构信息

Division of General Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Hospital of Cattinara, University of Trieste, Strada di Fiume 447, 34149, Trieste, Italy.

Breast Unit Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste-ASUITS¸ Division of General Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Hospital of Cattinara, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.

出版信息

Updates Surg. 2020 Mar;72(1):89-96. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00703-y. Epub 2020 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1007/s13304-020-00703-y
PMID:31965546
Abstract

Screening programs (SC) have been proven to reduce both incidence and mortality of CRC. We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent surgical treatment for CRC between 01/2011 and 01/2017. The current screening program in our region collects patients aged from 50 to 69. For this reason, out of a total of 600 patients, we compared 125 patients with CRC founded during the SC to 162 patients who presented with symptoms and were diagnosed between 50-69 years old (NO-SC). 45% patients in the SC group were diagnosed as AJCC stage I vs 27% patients in the NO-SC group; 14% vs 20% were stage II, 14% vs 26% were stage III, and 3% vs 14% were stage IV (p 0.002). We found a significant difference in surgical approach: 89% SC vs 56% NO-SC patients had laparoscopic surgery (p 0.002). In the NO-SC group, 16% patients underwent resection in an emergency setting. Only 5% patients in the SC group had postoperative complications vs 14% patients in the NO-SC group (p 0.03). We had a 2-year OS of 86%, being 95% in the SC group and 80% in the NO-SC group (p 0.002). Likewise, the whole 2-year DFS was 77%, whereas it was 90% in the SC group and 66% in the NO-SC group (p 0.002). Screening significantly improves early diagnosis and accelerated surgical treatment. We obtained earlier stages at diagnosis, a less invasive surgical approach, and lower rates of complications and emergency surgery, all this leading to an improvement in both OS and DFS.

摘要

筛查项目(Screening programs,SC)已被证实可降低 CRC 的发病率和死亡率。我们回顾性分析了 2011 年 1 月至 2017 年 1 月间接受 CRC 手术治疗的患者。本地区现行筛查项目针对 50-69 岁人群。因此,在总共 600 例患者中,我们将在 SC 中发现的 125 例 CRC 患者与因症状就诊并在 50-69 岁时确诊的 162 例患者(非 SC 组)进行了比较。SC 组中 45%的患者被诊断为 AJCC Ⅰ期,而非 SC 组中这一比例为 27%;Ⅱ期分别为 14%和 20%,Ⅲ期分别为 14%和 26%,Ⅳ期分别为 3%和 14%(p<0.002)。我们发现手术方式存在显著差异:89%的 SC 组患者和 56%的非 SC 组患者接受了腹腔镜手术(p<0.002)。在非 SC 组中,16%的患者在急诊时接受了切除手术。只有 5%的 SC 组患者出现术后并发症,而非 SC 组中这一比例为 14%(p<0.03)。我们的 2 年 OS 率为 86%,SC 组为 95%,非 SC 组为 80%(p<0.002)。同样,2 年 DFS 为 77%,SC 组为 90%,非 SC 组为 66%(p<0.002)。筛查显著改善了早期诊断并加速了手术治疗。我们在诊断时获得了更早的分期,采用了创伤更小的手术方式,且并发症和急诊手术的发生率更低,这一切都提高了 OS 和 DFS。

相似文献

1
Colorectal cancer-screening program improves both short- and long-term outcomes: a single-center experience in Trieste.结直肠癌筛查计划改善了短期和长期预后:的里雅斯特的单中心经验。
Updates Surg. 2020 Mar;72(1):89-96. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00703-y. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
2
Detrimental impact of symptom-detected colorectal cancer.症状检测结直肠癌的不良影响。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Feb;34(2):569-579. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06798-8. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
3
Comparison of short and long-time outcomes between laparoscopic and conventional open multivisceral resection for primary T4b colorectal cancer.腹腔镜与传统开腹广泛性结直肠切除术治疗原发性 T4b 结直肠癌的近期和远期疗效比较。
Asian J Surg. 2019 Jan;42(1):401-408. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.06.010. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
4
Long-term Outcomes of One Stage Surgery Using Transanal Colorectal Tube for Acute Colorectal Obstruction of Stage II/III Distal Colon Cancer.经肛直肠管一期手术治疗Ⅱ/Ⅲ期远端结肠癌急性结直肠梗阻的长期疗效。
Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Apr;51(2):474-482. doi: 10.4143/crt.2018.059. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
5
Short- and long-term outcomes following laparoscopic open surgery for pathological T4 colorectal cancer: 10 years of experience in a single center.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗病理性 T4 结直肠癌的近期和远期疗效:单中心 10 年经验
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan 7;24(1):76-86. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i1.76.
6
Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic vs open surgery for stages II and III rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗II期和III期直肠癌的长期肿瘤学结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 14;21(18):5505-12. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i18.5505.
7
Laparoscopic versus conventional palliative resection for incurable, symptomatic stage IV colorectal cancer: impact on short-term results.腹腔镜手术与传统姑息性切除术治疗无法治愈的有症状的IV期结直肠癌:对短期结果的影响
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Jun;21(3):184-7. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31821db75e.
8
Should we still doubt the success of emergency oncologic colorectal surgery?: A retrospective study.我们还应怀疑急诊肿瘤性结直肠手术的成功率吗?一项回顾性研究。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2020 Jan;26(1):55-62. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2019.04043.
9
Laparoscopic vs. open approach for pT3/pT4 colorectal cancer in the elderly: ten-year experience in a single center.老年pT3/pT4期结直肠癌的腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗:单中心十年经验
Minerva Chir. 2018 Feb;73(1):20-28. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4733.17.07417-X. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
10
Postoperative Outcomes of Screen-Detected vs Non-Screen-Detected Colorectal Cancer in the Netherlands.荷兰筛查检出与非筛查检出结直肠癌的术后结局比较。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Dec 1;153(12):e183567. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3567. Epub 2018 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance and Prognostic Relevance of Lymph Node Assessment by One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification Assay in Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Study.一步核酸扩增检测评估直肠癌淋巴结的性能及预后相关性:一项多中心研究
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 25;17(13):2141. doi: 10.3390/cancers17132141.
2
Polymorphic Single-Nucleotide Variants in miRNA Genes and the Susceptibility to Colorectal Cancer: Combined Evaluation by Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis, Thakkinstian's Algorithm and FPRP Criterium.微小RNA基因中的多态性单核苷酸变异与结直肠癌易感性:通过成对和网络荟萃分析、萨金蒂安算法及FPRP标准进行综合评估
Cancer Med. 2025 Jan;14(2):e70621. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70621.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Colorectal Cancer Screening.结直肠癌筛查
WMJ. 2017 Feb;116(1):27-33.
2
Screening for Colorectal Neoplasia.结直肠肿瘤的筛查
N Engl J Med. 2017 Apr 20;376(16):1598-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1702535.
3
Screening for Colorectal Neoplasia.结直肠肿瘤的筛查
Involvement in treatment decision-making and self-reported efficacy among patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a nationwide multi-center cross-sectional study.
晚期结直肠癌患者参与治疗决策及自我报告的疗效:一项全国多中心横断面研究。
Front Oncol. 2023 Jul 26;13:1168078. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1168078. eCollection 2023.
4
Potential Application of Small Interfering RNA in Gastro-Intestinal Tumors.小干扰RNA在胃肠道肿瘤中的潜在应用
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022 Oct 20;15(10):1295. doi: 10.3390/ph15101295.
5
Using period analysis to timely assess and predict 5-year relative survival for colorectal cancer patients in Taizhou, eastern China.利用时间序列分析及时评估和预测中国东部泰州结直肠癌患者的 5 年相对生存率。
Cancer Med. 2023 Feb;12(3):3696-3704. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5220. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
6
Survival and long-term surgical outcomes after colorectal surgery: are there any gender-related differences?结直肠手术后的生存和长期手术结果:是否存在与性别相关的差异?
Updates Surg. 2022 Aug;74(4):1337-1343. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01323-4. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
N Engl J Med. 2017 Apr 20;376(16):1599. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1702535.
4
Cancer Incidence and Survival Trends by Subtype Using Data from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Program, 1992-2013.利用监测、流行病学与最终结果计划(1992 - 2013年)的数据,按亚型划分的癌症发病率和生存趋势
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Apr;26(4):632-641. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0520. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
5
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2564-2575. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5989.
6
Population-Based Colonoscopy Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.基于人群的结肠镜检查用于结直肠癌筛查:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Jul 1;176(7):894-902. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0960.
7
Systematic Review and Meta-study Synthesis of Qualitative Studies Evaluating Facilitators and Barriers to Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening.评估参与结直肠癌筛查的促进因素和障碍的定性研究的系统评价与荟萃综合分析
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Jun;25(6):907-17. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0990. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
8
Colorectal Cancer Health Disparities and the Role of US Law and Health Policy.结直肠癌的健康差异以及美国法律和卫生政策的作用。
Gastroenterology. 2016 May;150(5):1052-1055. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.03.012. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
9
USPSTF colorectal cancer screening guidelines: an extended look at multi-year interval testing.美国预防服务工作组结直肠癌筛查指南:对多年间隔期检测的深入探讨
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Feb 1;22(2):e77-81.
10
Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality.全球结直肠癌发病率和死亡率的模式和趋势。
Gut. 2017 Apr;66(4):683-691. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310912. Epub 2016 Jan 27.