• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年pT3/pT4期结直肠癌的腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗:单中心十年经验

Laparoscopic vs. open approach for pT3/pT4 colorectal cancer in the elderly: ten-year experience in a single center.

作者信息

Troian Marina, Bellio Gabriele, Pasquali Arianna, de Manzini Nicolò

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.

Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Trieste, Trieste, Italy -

出版信息

Minerva Chir. 2018 Feb;73(1):20-28. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4733.17.07417-X. Epub 2017 Nov 20.

DOI:10.23736/S0026-4733.17.07417-X
PMID:29154512
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of laparoscopic surgery for pT3/pT4 colorectal cancer (CRC) is still under debate. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic and open procedures for pT3/pT4 CRC in elderly patients.

METHODS

From January 2004 to December 2015, 225 patients aged ≥70 years underwent elective colorectal surgery for pT3/pT4 CRC at the Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Trieste. Patients' demographics, tumor's characteristics, intraoperative factors, short-term and long-term outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The study included 113 patients undergone open surgery and 112 who underwent laparoscopic surgery. Age was found to be statistically different between the two group, with open surgery patients being older than laparoscopic ones (P=0.009). The tumor location differed between the two groups (P=0.004), determining a variation in the incidence of surgical procedures performed (P<0.001). No other statistically significant differences were found in terms of intraoperative, histopathologic and oncologic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopy is as safe as open surgery for pT3/pT4 CRC and it is often feasible, though in old patients higher conversion rates should be anticipated than in younger ones.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜手术在pT3/pT4期结直肠癌(CRC)治疗中的作用仍存在争议。本研究旨在比较老年患者pT3/pT4期CRC腹腔镜手术与开放手术的疗效。

方法

2004年1月至2015年12月,的里雅斯特大学医院普通外科225例年龄≥70岁的患者因pT3/pT4期CRC接受择期结直肠手术。对患者的人口统计学资料、肿瘤特征、术中因素、短期和长期疗效进行回顾性分析。

结果

该研究纳入113例行开放手术的患者和112例行腹腔镜手术的患者。发现两组患者年龄存在统计学差异,开放手术患者年龄大于腹腔镜手术患者(P=0.009)。两组肿瘤位置不同(P=0.004),导致所施行手术的发生率存在差异(P<0.001)。在术中、组织病理学和肿瘤学因素方面未发现其他统计学显著差异。

结论

对于pT3/pT4期CRC,腹腔镜手术与开放手术一样安全,且通常可行,不过老年患者的中转率应高于年轻患者。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic vs. open approach for pT3/pT4 colorectal cancer in the elderly: ten-year experience in a single center.老年pT3/pT4期结直肠癌的腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗:单中心十年经验
Minerva Chir. 2018 Feb;73(1):20-28. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4733.17.07417-X. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
2
Outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for pT3/pT4 colorectal cancer in young vs. old patients.
Minerva Chir. 2019 Aug;74(4):297-303. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4733.19.07895-7. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
3
Short- and long-term outcomes following laparoscopic open surgery for pathological T4 colorectal cancer: 10 years of experience in a single center.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗病理性 T4 结直肠癌的近期和远期疗效:单中心 10 年经验
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan 7;24(1):76-86. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i1.76.
4
Laparoscopy as a prognostic factor in curative resection for node positive colorectal cancer: results for a single-institution nonrandomized prospective trial.腹腔镜检查作为淋巴结阳性结直肠癌根治性切除的预后因素:单机构非随机前瞻性试验结果
Surg Endosc. 2004 Jul;18(7):1130-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9152-3. Epub 2004 May 27.
5
[Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. A comparative study].[腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗结直肠癌的对比研究]
Cir Cir. 2014 May-Jun;82(3):274-81.
6
Laparoscopy could be the best approach to treat colorectal cancer in selected patients aged over 80 years: Outcomes from a multicenter study.腹腔镜检查可能是治疗80岁以上特定患者结直肠癌的最佳方法:一项多中心研究的结果
Dig Liver Dis. 2017 Jan;49(1):84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2016.06.039. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
7
Laparoscopic versus conventional palliative resection for incurable, symptomatic stage IV colorectal cancer: impact on short-term results.腹腔镜手术与传统姑息性切除术治疗无法治愈的有症状的IV期结直肠癌:对短期结果的影响
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Jun;21(3):184-7. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31821db75e.
8
Analysis of Recurrent Cases after Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.腹腔镜结直肠癌手术后复发病例分析
Hepatogastroenterology. 2014 Jun;61(132):1028-32.
9
A national evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes in open versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery.开放与腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的临床及经济结局的全国性评估。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4220-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4732-6. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
10
Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer is safe and has survival outcomes similar to those of open surgery in elderly patients with a poor performance status: subanalysis of a large multicenter case-control study in Japan.在日本进行的一项大型多中心病例对照研究的亚组分析显示,对于身体状况较差的老年患者,腹腔镜结直肠癌手术是安全的,其生存结果与开放手术相似。
J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan;51(1):43-54. doi: 10.1007/s00535-015-1083-y. Epub 2015 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
EAES/SAGES evidence-based recommendations and expert consensus on optimization of perioperative care in older adults.EAES/SAGES 关于优化老年人围手术期护理的循证建议和专家共识。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4104-4126. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10977-7. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
2
What Should We Recommend for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Adults Aged 75 and Older?对于75岁及以上的成年人,我们应该推荐哪些结直肠癌筛查方法?
Curr Oncol. 2021 Jul 9;28(4):2540-2547. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28040231.