• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Toward equitably high-quality cancer survivorship care.迈向公平的高质量癌症幸存者护理。
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2019 Jul 1;29(3):156-162. doi: 10.5737/23688076293156162. eCollection 2019 Summer.
2
What are the barriers of quality survivorship care for haematology cancer patients? Qualitative insights from cancer nurses.血液癌症患者优质生存护理的障碍有哪些?癌症护士的定性见解。
J Cancer Surviv. 2016 Feb;10(1):122-30. doi: 10.1007/s11764-015-0458-7. Epub 2015 May 30.
3
Barriers to Equity in Cancer Survivorship Care: Perspectives of Cancer Survivors and System Stakeholders.癌症幸存者护理中的公平障碍:癌症幸存者和系统利益相关者的观点。
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2021 Apr 14;8:23333936211006703. doi: 10.1177/23333936211006703. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
4
Cancer survivors' experiences of using survivorship care plans: a systematic review of qualitative studies.癌症幸存者使用生存护理计划的经历:定性研究的系统评价
J Cancer Surviv. 2015 Jun;9(2):260-8. doi: 10.1007/s11764-014-0407-x. Epub 2014 Oct 25.
5
When a policy decision meets practice realities: The case of cancer survivorship care and rehabilitation needs assessment.当政策决策遭遇实践现实:癌症幸存者护理与康复需求评估案例
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2018 Apr;33:70-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
6
Care Transitions in Childhood Cancer Survivorship: Providers' Perspectives.儿童癌症幸存者的护理过渡:提供者的观点
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2017 Mar;6(1):111-119. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2016.0035. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
7
Voices of Black men: reflecting on prostate cancer survivorship care plans.黑人男性的声音:对前列腺癌幸存者护理计划的反思
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Jun 24. doi: 10.1007/s11764-024-01624-0.
8
Cancer survivors' perspectives on delivery of survivorship care by primary care physicians: an internet-based survey.癌症幸存者对初级保健医生提供的癌症康复护理的看法:一项基于互联网的调查。
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Oct 20;16:143. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0367-x.
9
Survivorship care plans: are randomized controlled trials assessing outcomes that are relevant to stakeholders?生存护理计划:评估与利益相关者相关的结局的随机对照试验?
J Cancer Surviv. 2018 Aug;12(4):495-508. doi: 10.1007/s11764-018-0688-6. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
10
Understanding adjuvant endocrine therapy persistence in breast Cancer survivors.了解乳腺癌幸存者辅助内分泌治疗的持续情况。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jul 11;18(1):732. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4644-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Living with and beyond gynecologic cancer: A summary of current trends and perspectives.与妇科癌症共存及超越:当前趋势与观点综述
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2025 Jan 1;35(1):264-279. eCollection 2025 Winter.
2
Cancer-related care for rural and remote populations in Canada: A scoping review.加拿大农村和偏远地区人群的癌症相关护理:一项范围综述。
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2025 Jan 1;35(1):3-52. doi: 10.5737/236880763513. eCollection 2025 Winter.
3
Racial and ethnic disparities in financial toxicity among cancer survivors: implications for equity in survivorship care.癌症幸存者中经济毒性方面的种族和族裔差异:对生存护理公平性的影响。
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Jun 5. doi: 10.1007/s11764-025-01817-1.
4
Clinician's Commentary on Nicoll et al..临床医生对尼科尔等人的评论。
Physiother Can. 2023 Nov 27;75(4):348-349. doi: 10.3138/ptc-2021-0084-cc. eCollection 2023 Nov.
5
Intersectionality in nursing research: A scoping review.护理研究中的交叉性:一项范围综述。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2023 Dec;5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100155. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
6
Health and healthcare equity within the Canadian cancer care sector: a rapid scoping review.加拿大癌症护理领域的健康和医疗保健公平性:快速范围综述。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Jan 28;22(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01829-2.
7
Impact of cancer on income, wealth and economic outcomes of adult cancer survivors: a scoping review.癌症对成年癌症幸存者的收入、财富和经济结果的影响:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 5;12(9):e064714. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064714.
8
Cancer Survivors' Evolving Perceptions of a New Supportive Virtual Program.癌症幸存者对新型支持性虚拟项目的不断变化的看法。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Nov 5;29(11):8431-8441. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29110664.
9
Effect of High-Quality Whole-Course Care on Psychological Status and Postoperative Pharyngeal Complications in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Hyperparathyroidism Secondary to Chronic Rrenal Failure.优质全程护理对慢性肾衰竭继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进症手术患者心理状态及术后咽部并发症的影响
Front Surg. 2022 May 19;9:905413. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.905413. eCollection 2022.
10
Barriers to Equity in Cancer Survivorship Care: Perspectives of Cancer Survivors and System Stakeholders.癌症幸存者护理中的公平障碍:癌症幸存者和系统利益相关者的观点。
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2021 Apr 14;8:23333936211006703. doi: 10.1177/23333936211006703. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Bridging the gap from the oncology setting to community care through a cross-Canada environmental scan.通过全加拿大范围内的环境扫描弥合肿瘤治疗环境与社区护理之间的差距。
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2018 Feb 1;28(1):38-45. doi: 10.5737/236880762813845. eCollection 2018 Winter.
2
Experiences of adult cancer survivors in transitions.成人癌症幸存者的过渡期体验。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Aug;27(8):2977-2986. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4605-3. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
3
Equity in Cancer Care: Strategies for Oncology Nurses.癌症护理中的公平性:肿瘤护理策略
Nurs Clin North Am. 2017 Mar;52(1):211-225. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2016.11.003.
4
Follow-up care for survivors of lymphoma who have received curative-intent treatment.对接受了根治性治疗的淋巴瘤幸存者的后续护理。
Curr Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(5):e499-e513. doi: 10.3747/co.23.3265. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
5
Advancing Health Equity in Cancer Survivorship: Opportunities for Public Health.推进癌症幸存者的健康公平:公共卫生的机遇
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Dec;49(6 Suppl 5):S477-82. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.08.008.
6
Building qualitative study design using nursing's disciplinary epistemology.运用护理学学科认识论构建质性研究设计。
J Adv Nurs. 2016 Feb;72(2):451-60. doi: 10.1111/jan.12822. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
7
Prostate cancer survivorship care guideline: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline endorsement.前列腺癌生存者照护指南:美国临床肿瘤学会临床实践指南支持声明。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 20;33(9):1078-85. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.60.2557. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
8
Particularizing the general: Sustaining theoretical integrity in the context of an evidence-based practice agenda.细化通则:在循证实践议程背景下维持理论完整性。
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2014 Jan-Mar;37(1):5-18. doi: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000011.
9
Changing communication needs and preferences across the cancer care trajectory: insights from the patient perspective.癌症治疗全程中沟通需求和偏好的变化:来自患者视角的见解。
Support Care Cancer. 2014 Apr;22(4):1009-15. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-2056-4. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
10
What cancer survivorship means.癌症幸存者的含义。
Virtual Mentor. 2013 Aug 1;15(8):697-703. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2013.15.8.msoc1-1308.

迈向公平的高质量癌症幸存者护理。

Toward equitably high-quality cancer survivorship care.

作者信息

Truant Tracy L O, Varcoe Colleen, Gotay Carolyn C, Thorne Sally

机构信息

Former Director, Research, Education and Innovation, BC Cancer, Vancouver BC,

Professor, School of Nursing, University of British Columbia,

出版信息

Can Oncol Nurs J. 2019 Jul 1;29(3):156-162. doi: 10.5737/23688076293156162. eCollection 2019 Summer.

DOI:10.5737/23688076293156162
PMID:31966022
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6970468/
Abstract

Although models of cancer survivorship care are rapidly evolving, there is increasing evidence of health disparities among cancer survivors. In the current context, Canada's survivorship care systems privilege some and not others to receive high-quality care and optimize their health outcomes. The aim of this study was to improve survivorship care systems by helping clinicians and decision makers to a better understanding of how various psychosocial/political factors, survivors' health experiences and health management strategies might shape the development of and access to high-quality survivorship care for Canadians with cancer. Using a nursing epistemological approach informed by critical and intersectional perspectives, we conducted a three-phased Interpretive Description study. We engaged in critical textual analysis of documentary sources, a secondary analysis of interview transcripts from an existing database, and qualitative interviews with 34 survivors and 12 system stakeholders. On the basis of these data, we identified individual, group, and system factors that contributed to gaps between survivors' expected and actual survivorship care experiences. By understanding what shapes survivorship care systems and resources, we help illuminate and unravel the complex nature of the issue, supporting clinicians and decision makers to find multi-layered approaches for equitably high-quality survivorship care.

摘要

尽管癌症生存护理模式正在迅速发展,但越来越多的证据表明癌症幸存者之间存在健康差异。在当前背景下,加拿大的生存护理系统使一些人而非其他人有特权接受高质量护理并优化其健康结果。本研究的目的是通过帮助临床医生和决策者更好地理解各种社会心理/政治因素、幸存者的健康经历和健康管理策略如何可能影响加拿大癌症患者获得高质量生存护理的发展和机会,来改善生存护理系统。我们采用了一种受批判性和交叉性视角启发的护理认识论方法,进行了一个分三个阶段的解释性描述研究。我们对文献资料进行了批判性文本分析,对现有数据库中的访谈记录进行了二次分析,并对34名幸存者和12名系统利益相关者进行了定性访谈。基于这些数据,我们确定了导致幸存者预期和实际生存护理经历之间差距的个人、群体和系统因素。通过了解影响生存护理系统和资源的因素,我们有助于阐明并揭示该问题的复杂性,支持临床医生和决策者找到实现公平高质量生存护理的多层次方法。