Wejnerowski Lukasz, Cerbin Slawek, Dziuba Marcin Krzysztof
Department of Hydrobiology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznań, Poland.
Zool Stud. 2015 Jan 3;54:e2. doi: 10.1186/s40555-014-0084-5. eCollection 2015.
Filamentous cyanobacteria are known to negatively affect the life history of planktonic herbivores through mechanical interference with filtering apparatus. Here, we hypothesise that not only the length but also thethickness of cyanobacterial filaments is an important factor shaping the life history of .
To test our hypothesis, we cultured with non-toxin-producing strains of either or.The former possesses wide filaments, whereas the latter has thinner filaments. The strain of has two morphological forms differing in filament widths. The exposure to the thicker filaments caused a stronger body-length reduction in females at maturity and a greater decrease in offspring number than exposure to the thinner filaments. The width of filaments, however, did not significantly affect the length of newborns. The analysis of mixed thick and thin filament width distribution revealed that reduces the number of thinner filaments, while the proportion of thicker ones increases.Also, the effects of cyanobacterial exudates alone were examined to determine whether the changes in lifehistory were indeed caused directly by the physical presence of morphologically different filaments and not by confounding effects from metabolite exudation. This experiment demonstrated no negative effects of both and exudates.
To our knowledge, this is the first study that demonstrates that the thickness of a cyanobacterial filament might be an important factor in shaping 's life history. At a given biomass, thicker filaments of were more detrimental to than thinner ones of . There was also a strong interaction between species of the cyanobacterium and filament biomass, where species with thicker filaments and at higher biomass had the strongest negative impact on life history.
已知丝状蓝藻通过对滤食器官的机械干扰对浮游食草动物的生活史产生负面影响。在此,我们假设不仅蓝藻丝状体的长度,而且其厚度也是塑造[具体生物]生活史的一个重要因素。
为了验证我们的假设,我们用[具体蓝藻1]或[具体蓝藻2]的无毒生产菌株培养[具体生物]。前者具有较宽的丝状体,而后者的丝状体较细。[具体蓝藻3]菌株有两种丝状宽度不同的形态形式。与接触较细的[具体蓝藻2]丝状体相比,接触较厚的[具体蓝藻1]丝状体导致成熟雌性个体体长的降幅更大,后代数量减少得更多。然而,丝状体宽度对新生个体的长度没有显著影响。对粗细混合的[具体蓝藻3]丝状体宽度分布的分析表明,[具体蓝藻3]减少了较细丝状体的数量,而较粗丝状体的比例增加。此外,还单独研究了蓝藻分泌物的影响,以确定[具体生物]生活史的变化是否确实是由形态不同的丝状体的物理存在直接引起的,而不是由代谢物分泌的混杂效应引起的。该实验表明[具体蓝藻1]和分泌物均无负面影响。
据我们所知,这是第一项证明蓝藻丝状体厚度可能是塑造[具体生物]生活史的一个重要因素的研究。在给定生物量下,[具体蓝藻1]较厚的丝状体对[具体生物]的危害比[具体蓝藻2]较细的丝状体更大。蓝藻物种与丝状体生物量之间也存在强烈的相互作用,其中丝状体较厚且生物量较高的物种对[具体生物]生活史的负面影响最强。