Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital, 23, Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 02447, South Korea.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Korea University Ansan Hospital, 123, Jeokgeum-ro, Danwon-Gu, Ansan-si, Gyeongki-do, 15355, South Korea.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Mar;140(3):383-390. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03343-4. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
A flexible reamer system (FRS) for transportal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been developed to overcome the technical challenges of a rigid reamer system. The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and effectiveness of the two-portal technique using an FRS by evaluating femoral tunnel geometry.
This study included 30 patients (mean age 30 ± 12.1) who underwent transportal single-bundle ACLR. Operations were performed with the two-portal technique using an FRS. Three-dimensional computed tomography was performed for all patients 2 days after the operation. The femoral tunnel position, femoral graft bending angle, femoral tunnel length, and posterior wall breakage were evaluated. These radiologic outcomes were compared to previous literature-reported outcomes.
The mean distances (measured as a percentage) from the posterior wall and the intercondylar notch roof to the femoral tunnel center were 29.6 ± 5.5% and 20.1 ± 6.7%, respectively. The femoral graft bending angle (108.4° ± 6.9°) was similar to that associated with the traditional transportal technique using a rigid reamer system, but it was less acute than that associated with the three-portal technique using an FRS. The femoral tunnel length (32.8 ± 4.5 mm) was also similar to the results of the traditional transportal technique using a rigid reamer system, but it was shorter than that of three-portal technique using an FRS. The prevalence of posterior wall breakage was as low as the reported outcomes of the outside-in technique (2 cases, 6.6%).
The two-portal technique for transportal ACLR using an FRS can achieve comparable femoral graft bending angle and femoral tunnel length compared with the conventional three-portal technique using the rigid reamer system and had a low risk of posterior wall breakage. Therefore, the two-portal technique using the FRS can be considered a safe and effective method for transportal ACLR.
Retrospective case series; level of evidence, 4.
为了克服刚性扩孔器系统的技术挑战,开发了一种用于经皮前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)的柔性扩孔器系统(FRS)。本研究的目的是通过评估股骨隧道的几何形状来研究使用 FRS 的双通道技术的安全性和有效性。
本研究纳入了 30 名患者(平均年龄 30±12.1 岁),他们接受了经皮单束 ACLR。所有患者均采用 FRS 的双通道技术进行手术。术后 2 天对所有患者进行三维 CT 检查。评估了股骨隧道位置、股骨移植物弯曲角度、股骨隧道长度和后侧壁破裂情况。这些影像学结果与之前文献报道的结果进行了比较。
从后侧壁和髁间窝顶到股骨隧道中心的平均距离(以百分比表示)分别为 29.6±5.5%和 20.1±6.7%。股骨移植物弯曲角度(108.4°±6.9°)与使用刚性扩孔器的传统经皮隧道技术相似,但比使用 FRS 的三通道技术更不尖锐。股骨隧道长度(32.8±4.5mm)也与使用刚性扩孔器的传统经皮隧道技术相似,但比使用 FRS 的三通道技术短。后侧壁破裂的发生率与外侧入路技术(2 例,6.6%)的报道结果一样低。
使用 FRS 的经皮 ACLR 双通道技术可实现与传统三通道刚性扩孔器系统相比,可获得相似的股骨移植物弯曲角度和股骨隧道长度,且后侧壁破裂风险较低。因此,使用 FRS 的双通道技术可被认为是一种安全有效的经皮 ACLR 方法。
回顾性病例系列;证据等级,4 级。