Kotłowski Roman, Grecka Katarzyna, Kot Barbara, Szweda Piotr
Department of Microbiology and Molecular Biotechnology, Faculty of Chemistry, Gdańsk University of Technology, Str. G. Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland.
Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Gdańsk University of Technology, Str. G. Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland.
Pathogens. 2020 Jan 21;9(2):73. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9020073.
Easy-to-perform, fast, and inexpensive methods of differentiation of strains beyond the species level are highly required. Herein two new, original tools for genotyping of E. coli isolates are proposed. The first of the developed method, a PCR-RFLP (polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism) test uses a highly variable gene, encoding the H antigen as a molecular target. The designing of universal pair of primers and selection of the optimal restriction enzyme I was preceded by in silico comparative analysis of the sequences of the genes coding for 53 different serotypes of H-antigen ( flagellin). The target fragments of genomes for MLST method were selected on the basis of bioinformatics analysis of complete sequences of 16 genomes of . Initially, seven molecular targets were proposed (seven pairs of primers) and five of them were found useful for effective genotyping of strains. Both developed methods revealed high differentiation power, and a high genetic diversity of the strains tested was observed. Within the group of 71 strains tested, 29 and 47 clusters were revealed with RFLP-PCR and MLST methods, respectively. Differentiation of the strains with the reference BOX-PCR method revealed 31 different genotypes. The in silico analysis revealed that the discriminatory power of the new MLST method is comparable to the Pasteur and Achtman schemes and is higher than the discriminatory power of the method developed by Clermont. From the epidemiology point of view, the outcomes of our investigation revealed that in most cases, the patients were infected with unique strains, probably from environmental sources. However, some strains isolated from different patients of the wards of pediatrics, internal medicine, and neurology were classified to the same genotype when the results of all three methods were taken into account. It could suggest that they were transferred between the patients.
迫切需要易于操作、快速且廉价的菌株鉴别方法,以超越物种水平。本文提出了两种用于大肠杆菌分离株基因分型的新的原创工具。所开发的第一种方法是PCR-RFLP(聚合酶链反应-限制性片段长度多态性)测试,它使用一个高度可变的基因,该基因编码H抗原作为分子靶点。在设计通用引物对和选择最佳限制性内切酶I之前,对编码53种不同血清型H抗原(鞭毛蛋白)的基因序列进行了计算机模拟比较分析。基于对16个大肠杆菌基因组完整序列的生物信息学分析,选择了用于多位点序列分型(MLST)方法的基因组目标片段。最初提出了七个分子靶点(七对引物),其中五个被发现可用于菌株的有效基因分型。两种开发的方法都显示出高鉴别力,并且观察到测试菌株具有高遗传多样性。在测试所的71株菌株中,RFLP-PCR和MLST方法分别揭示了29个和47个簇。用参考BOX-PCR方法对菌株进行鉴别,揭示了31种不同的基因型。计算机模拟分析表明,新的MLST方法的鉴别力与巴斯德和阿赫特曼方案相当,且高于克莱蒙所开发方法的鉴别力。从流行病学角度来看,我们的调查结果表明,在大多数情况下,患者感染的是可能来自环境源的独特菌株。然而,当考虑到所有三种方法的结果时,从儿科、内科和神经科病房不同患者分离出的一些菌株被归类为相同的基因型。这可能表明它们在患者之间传播。