Service de Microbiologie, Centre National de Référence Associé Escherichia coli, Hôpital Robert-Debré, AP-HP, Paris, France.
IAME, UMR 1137, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019 Mar 6;85(6). doi: 10.1128/AEM.02812-18. Print 2019 Mar 15.
We developed a multiplex PCR method based on multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat (VNTR) analysis (MLVA) that was designed for the rapid typing of and isolates. The method amplifies seven VNTRs and does not require a sequencing capillary or fluorescent dyes. The amplification products are simply loaded on a standard agarose gel for electrophoresis, and the banding patterns are analyzed visually. We evaluated the method on 220 strains belonging to different collections: the reference (ECOR) collection ( = 72), O1:K1 isolates causing neonatal meningitis ( = 38), extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing fecal isolates belonging to the worldwide sequence type 131 (ST131) clone ( = 38), Shiga toxin-producing (STEC) isolates of serogroups O157:H7 ( = 21) and O26 ( = 16, 8 of which belonged to an outbreak), 27 isolates (22 isolates, including 5 epidemic strains), and 8 reference strains. The performances were compared to those of multilocus sequence typing (MLST), the DiversiLab automated repetitive element palindromic PCR (REP-PCR), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). We found 66 different profiles among the isolates in the ECOR collection. Among the clonal group O1:K1 isolates, 14 different profiles were identified. For the 37 STEC isolates, we found 23 profiles, with 1 corresponding to the 8 epidemic strains. We found 19 profiles among the 27 isolates, with 1 corresponding to the epidemic strain. The method was able to recognize strains of the ST131 clone and to distinguish the O16 and O25b serogroups and identified 15 different MLVA types among them. This method allows the simple, fast, and inexpensive typing of / isolates that can be carried out in any laboratory equipped for molecular biology and has a discriminatory power superior to that of MLST and DiversiLab REP-PCR but slightly lower than that of PFGE. Fast typing methods that can easily and accurately distinguish clonal groups and unrelated isolates are of particular interest for microbiologists confronted with outbreaks or performing epidemiological studies. Highly discriminatory universal methods, like PFGE, optical mapping, or WGS, are expensive and/or time-consuming. MLST is useful for phylogeny but is less discriminatory and requires sequencing facilities. PCR methods, which are fast and easy to perform, also have drawbacks. Random PCRs and REP-PCR are universal but lack reproducibility. Other PCR methods may lack the discriminatory power to differentiate isolates during outbreaks. MLVA combines the advantages of PCR methods with a high discriminatory power but in its standard form requires sequencing capillary electrophoresis. The method that we have developed combines the advantages of standard PCR (simple, fast, and inexpensive) with the high discriminatory power of MLVA and permits the typing of all isolates (either intestinal or extraintestinal pathogenic isolates as well as commensal isolates).
我们开发了一种基于多位点可变数串联重复序列(VNTR)分析(MLVA)的多重 PCR 方法,旨在快速分型和 分离株。该方法扩增 7 个 VNTR,无需测序毛细管或荧光染料。扩增产物只需加载在标准琼脂糖凝胶上进行电泳,然后通过肉眼分析条带模式。我们在属于不同收集的 220 株菌株上评估了该方法:ECOR 参考(ECOR)收集(n = 72)、引起新生儿脑膜炎的 O1:K1 分离株(n = 38)、属于全球序列型 131(ST131)克隆的产广谱β-内酰胺酶的粪便分离株(n = 38)、产志贺毒素的 O157:H7(n = 21)和 O26(n = 16,其中 8 株属于暴发)血清群的 分离株、27 株 分离株(22 株分离株,包括 5 株流行株)和 8 株参考株。将性能与多位点序列分型(MLST)、DiversiLab 自动化重复元件回文 PCR(REP-PCR)、脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)和全基因组测序(WGS)进行了比较。我们在 ECOR 收集的分离株中发现了 66 种不同的图谱。在克隆群 O1:K1 分离株中,确定了 14 种不同的图谱。在 37 株 STEC 分离株中,我们发现了 23 种图谱,其中 1 种与 8 株流行株相对应。在 27 株 分离株中发现了 19 种图谱,其中 1 种与流行株相对应。该方法能够识别 ST131 克隆的菌株,并区分 O16 和 O25b 血清群,并在其中鉴定出 15 种不同的 MLVA 类型。该方法允许对 / 分离株进行简单、快速且廉价的分型,可在配备分子生物学设备的任何实验室中进行,其分辨力优于 MLST 和 DiversiLab REP-PCR,但略低于 PFGE。对于面临暴发或进行流行病学研究的微生物学家来说,易于操作且能够准确区分克隆群和无关分离株的快速分型方法特别有意义。高分辨通用方法,如 PFGE、光学作图或 WGS,既昂贵又耗时。MLST 对系统发育有用,但分辨力较低,并且需要测序设施。PCR 方法快速且易于执行,但也有缺点。随机 PCR 和 REP-PCR 是通用的,但缺乏可重复性。其他 PCR 方法可能缺乏在暴发期间区分分离株的分辨力。MLVA 将 PCR 方法的优势与高分辨力相结合,但在其标准形式下需要测序毛细管电泳。我们开发的方法结合了标准 PCR(简单、快速和廉价)的优势和 MLVA 的高分辨力,并允许对所有 分离株(无论是肠道或肠道外致病性分离株还是共生分离株)进行分型。