College of Nursing, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado; University of Colorado Population Center (CUPC), University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado.
Population Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
J Adolesc Health. 2020 Jun;66(6):719-724. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.12.002. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
Texas is one of 24 states that does not explicitly allow minors to consent to contraception. We explore changes in the provision of confidential reproductive health services after the implementation of state policies that cut and reorganized public family planning funding, including Title X.
We use data from 3 waves of in-depth interviews, conducted between February 2012 and February 2015, with program administrators at publicly funded family planning organizations in Texas about changes in service delivery. We conducted a thematic analysis of transcripts from 47 organizations with segments related to the provision of services to minor teens.
Overall, 34 of the 47 organizations received Title X funding before 2013, and 79% lost this funding during the study period. Respondents at these organizations frequently reported a decrease in teen clients, which they attributed to loss of confidential services previously guaranteed under Title X. As the number of Title X-funded sites decreased, availability of confidential services became inconsistent. Most organizations offered confidential testing for pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections, but availability of confidential contraceptive services varied across and within organizations and often depended on insurance coverage. Respondents also reported challenges clarifying parental consent requirements after the changes in Title X and state funding.
Loss of Title X funding decreased availability of quality family planning services for teens and burdened organizations. As the new Title X regulations are implemented, family planning organizations' experiences in Texas foreshadow what might occur nationally, particularly in states that do not allow minors to consent for contraception.
德克萨斯州是 24 个没有明确允许未成年人同意避孕的州之一。我们探讨了在实施削减和重组公共计划生育资金的州政策(包括《Title X 法案》)后,提供保密生殖健康服务的变化。
我们使用了 3 次深入访谈的数据,这些访谈是在 2012 年 2 月至 2015 年 2 月期间,对德克萨斯州公共资助计划生育组织的项目管理人员进行的,了解服务提供方面的变化。我们对来自 47 个组织的记录进行了主题分析,这些组织的部分内容与向未成年青少年提供服务有关。
总体而言,在 2013 年之前,47 个组织中有 34 个组织获得了《Title X 法案》的资金,在研究期间,79%的组织失去了这项资金。这些组织的受访者经常报告青少年客户减少,他们将其归因于之前在《Title X 法案》下保证的保密服务的丧失。随着获得《Title X 法案》资助的站点数量减少,保密服务的可用性变得不一致。大多数组织提供妊娠和性传播感染的保密检测,但在组织内部和组织之间,保密避孕服务的可用性存在差异,而且往往取决于保险覆盖范围。受访者还报告说,在《Title X 法案》和州资金发生变化后,澄清父母同意要求方面存在挑战。
失去《Title X 法案》的资金减少了青少年获得优质计划生育服务的机会,并给组织带来了负担。随着新的《Title X 法案》规定的实施,德克萨斯州的计划生育组织的经验预示着可能在全国范围内发生的情况,特别是在不允许未成年人同意避孕的州。