Cognitive Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Biological Psychology, Institute for Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Psychophysiology. 2020 Feb;57(2):e13471. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13471. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
Depending on feedback timing, the neural structures involved in learning differ, with the dopamine system including the dorsal striatum and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) being more important for learning from immediate than delayed feedback. As stress has been shown to promote striatum-dependent learning, the current study aimed to explore if stress differentially affects learning from and processing of immediate and delayed feedback. One group of male participants was stressed using the socially evaluated cold pressor test, and another group underwent a control condition. Subsequently, participants performed a reward learning task with immediate (500 ms) and delayed (6,500 ms) feedback while brain activity was assessed with electroencephalography (EEG). While stress enhanced the accuracy for delayed relative to immediate feedback, it reduced the feedback-related negativity (FRN) valence effect, which is the amplitude difference between negative and positive feedback. For the P300, a reduced valence effect was found in the stress group only for delayed feedback. Frontal theta power was most pronounced for immediate negative feedback and was generally reduced under stress. Moreover, stress reduced associations of FRN and theta power with trial-by-trial accuracy. Associations between stress-induced cortisol increases and EEG components were examined using linear mixed effects analyses, which showed that the described stress effects were accompanied by associations between the stress-induced cortisol increases and feedback processing. The results indicate that stress and cortisol affect different aspects of feedback processing. Instead of an increased recruitment of the dopamine system and the ACC, the results may suggest enhanced salience processing and reduced cognitive control under stress.
根据反馈的时间,参与学习的神经结构也不同,多巴胺系统(包括背侧纹状体和前扣带皮层)对于即时反馈的学习比延迟反馈更为重要。由于应激已被证明可促进纹状体依赖的学习,因此本研究旨在探讨应激是否会对即时和延迟反馈的学习和处理产生差异影响。一组男性参与者通过社会评价性冷加压测试来承受压力,另一组则进行对照条件。随后,参与者在执行奖励学习任务时,会接收到即时(500 毫秒)和延迟(6500 毫秒)的反馈,同时使用脑电图(EEG)评估大脑活动。虽然应激增强了对延迟反馈的准确性,相对于即时反馈,但它降低了反馈相关负波(FRN)效价效应,即正负反馈之间的振幅差异。对于 P300,仅在延迟反馈中,应激组的效价效应降低。额部θ功率在即时负反馈时最为明显,在应激下通常会降低。此外,应激会降低 FRN 和θ功率与逐次准确性的关联。使用线性混合效应分析检查了 FRN 和θ功率与应激诱导的皮质醇增加之间的关联,结果表明,描述的应激效应伴随着应激诱导的皮质醇增加与反馈处理之间的关联。研究结果表明,应激和皮质醇会影响反馈处理的不同方面。结果可能表明,在应激下,增强了突显处理,而减少了认知控制,而不是多巴胺系统和 ACC 的募集增加。