• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

特质焦虑会带来“更好”的表现?一项关于急性应激与不确定性决策的研究。

Trait Anxiety Leads to "Better" Performance? A Study on Acute Stress and Uncertain Decision-Making.

作者信息

Yang Yuxuan, Yan Bingxin, Sun Kewei, Wu Di, Wang Cancan, Xiao Wei

机构信息

Department of Military Medical Psychology, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Dec 12;14(12):1186. doi: 10.3390/bs14121186.

DOI:10.3390/bs14121186
PMID:39767327
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11673477/
Abstract

In uncertain situations, individuals seek to maximize rewards while managing risks. Yet, the effects of acute stress and anxiety on decision-making in ambiguous and risky contexts are unclear. This study aims to contribute to the exploration of how acute stress influences sensitivity to immediate vs. delayed rewards, risk management strategies, and the role of anxiety in these processes. This study used the laboratory acute stress induction paradigm to analyze the direction of influence of acute stress on ambiguity decision-making and risky decision-making in males and then used moderating effect analysis to study the impact of anxiety on this process. The results show that a combination of the Socially Evaluated Cold Pressor Test and the Sing-a-Song Stress Test can successfully induce acute stress, which reduces both the proportion of the options selected that represent long-term rewards and risk-adjustment ability. Additionally, trait anxiety had a moderating effect on the influence of stress on ambiguity decision-making. Acute stress reduces focus on long-term rewards while increasing focus on short-term rewards, leading to impulsivity and impaired risk-adjustment. Additionally, to some extent, high trait anxiety scores predict better performance in making decisions under ambiguity during stress.

摘要

在不确定的情况下,个体在管理风险的同时寻求最大化回报。然而,急性应激和焦虑对模糊和风险情境下决策的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨急性应激如何影响对即时奖励与延迟奖励的敏感性、风险管理策略以及焦虑在这些过程中的作用。本研究采用实验室急性应激诱导范式分析急性应激对男性模糊决策和风险决策的影响方向,然后采用调节效应分析研究焦虑对这一过程的影响。结果表明,社会评价冷压试验和唱歌应激试验相结合能够成功诱导急性应激,这降低了代表长期奖励的选项选择比例和风险调整能力。此外,特质焦虑对压力影响模糊决策具有调节作用。急性应激减少了对长期奖励的关注,同时增加了对短期奖励的关注,导致冲动性和风险调整能力受损。此外,在一定程度上,高特质焦虑得分预示着在压力下进行模糊决策时表现更好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8954/11673477/94ce9d8edfd4/behavsci-14-01186-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8954/11673477/d91888246e38/behavsci-14-01186-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8954/11673477/a3e6d4e09d12/behavsci-14-01186-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8954/11673477/e664701c1625/behavsci-14-01186-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8954/11673477/f96539d8af77/behavsci-14-01186-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8954/11673477/033605b191cc/behavsci-14-01186-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8954/11673477/ca7488795a1e/behavsci-14-01186-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8954/11673477/af47dc3d2e5d/behavsci-14-01186-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8954/11673477/94ce9d8edfd4/behavsci-14-01186-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8954/11673477/d91888246e38/behavsci-14-01186-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8954/11673477/a3e6d4e09d12/behavsci-14-01186-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8954/11673477/e664701c1625/behavsci-14-01186-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8954/11673477/f96539d8af77/behavsci-14-01186-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8954/11673477/033605b191cc/behavsci-14-01186-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8954/11673477/ca7488795a1e/behavsci-14-01186-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8954/11673477/af47dc3d2e5d/behavsci-14-01186-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8954/11673477/94ce9d8edfd4/behavsci-14-01186-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Trait Anxiety Leads to "Better" Performance? A Study on Acute Stress and Uncertain Decision-Making.特质焦虑会带来“更好”的表现?一项关于急性应激与不确定性决策的研究。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Dec 12;14(12):1186. doi: 10.3390/bs14121186.
2
Acute stress improves long-term reward maximization in decision-making under uncertainty.急性应激可改善不确定性决策下的长期奖励最大化。
Brain Cogn. 2019 Jul;133:84-93. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
3
Acute stress enhances tolerance of uncertainty during decision-making.急性应激增强决策时对不确定性的容忍度。
Cognition. 2020 Dec;205:104448. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104448. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
4
Risk and Rationality in Adolescent Decision Making: Implications for Theory, Practice, and Public Policy.青少年决策中的风险与理性:对理论、实践和公共政策的启示。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006 Sep;7(1):1-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00026.x. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
5
Non-human primates use combined rules when deciding under ambiguity.非人类灵长类动物在面临模糊情景时会使用综合规则进行决策。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Mar;376(1819):20190672. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0672. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
6
Immediate emotions and subjective stakes in risky decision-making under uncertainty.不确定性下风险决策中的即时情绪与主观利害关系。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2022 Nov;35(6):649-661. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2021.1994143. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
7
Trait Anxiety Has Effect on Decision Making under Ambiguity but Not Decision Making under Risk.特质焦虑对模糊情境下的决策有影响,但对风险情境下的决策没有影响。
PLoS One. 2015 May 22;10(5):e0127189. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127189. eCollection 2015.
8
Pre-specified Anxiety Predicts Future Decision-Making Performances Under Different Temporally Constrained Conditions.预先设定的焦虑情绪可预测不同时间限制条件下未来的决策表现。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 9;10:1544. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01544. eCollection 2019.
9
Acute stress affects risk taking but not ambiguity aversion.急性应激会影响冒险行为,但不会影响对模糊性的厌恶。
Front Neurosci. 2014 May 6;8:82. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00082. eCollection 2014.
10
Effects of acute pain and pain-related fear on risky decision-making and effort during cognitive tests.急性疼痛和与疼痛相关的恐惧对认知测试中风险决策和努力的影响。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2019 Dec;41(10):1033-1047. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2019.1646711. Epub 2019 Jul 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Gonads under stress: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of acute psychosocial stress on gonadal steroids secretion in humans.应激状态下的性腺:关于急性心理社会应激对人体性腺类固醇分泌影响的系统评价与荟萃分析
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2024 Jun;164:107004. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2024.107004. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
2
Effects of acute stress on risky decision-making are related to neuroticism: An fMRI study of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task.急性应激对风险决策的影响与神经质有关:一项关于气球模拟风险任务的功能磁共振成像研究。
J Affect Disord. 2023 Nov 1;340:120-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.08.038. Epub 2023 Aug 6.
3
Intrinsic Traits Such as Personality and Decision-Making Style are Predictive of Stress in Surrogate Decision-Makers.
内在特质,如人格和决策风格,可预测代理人决策者的压力。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2023 Jul;40(7):694-703. doi: 10.1177/10499091221135594. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
4
Risky Decision Making Under Stressful Conditions: Men and Women With Smaller Cortisol Elevations Make Riskier Social and Economic Decisions.压力情境下的风险决策:皮质醇升高幅度较小的男性和女性会做出风险更高的社会和经济决策。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 4;13:810031. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.810031. eCollection 2022.
5
Neuropeptides as regulators of the hypothalamus-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis activity and their putative roles in stress-induced fertility disorders.神经肽作为下丘脑-垂体-性腺(HPG)轴活动的调节剂及其在应激诱导的生育障碍中的潜在作用。
Neuropeptides. 2022 Feb;91:102216. doi: 10.1016/j.npep.2021.102216. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
6
Emotional stress & decision-making: an emotional stressor significantly reduces loss aversion.情绪压力与决策:一种情绪压力源会显著降低损失厌恶。
Stress. 2021 Nov;24(6):780-786. doi: 10.1080/10253890.2021.1919617. Epub 2021 May 7.
7
Stress Makes the Difference: Social Stress and Social Anxiety in Decision-Making Under Uncertainty.压力起关键作用:不确定性决策中的社会压力与社交焦虑
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 22;12:578293. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.578293. eCollection 2021.
8
Learning to make smart choices in the context of risk: The roles of internal affective feedback and life events.在风险情境中学会做出明智选择:内部情感反馈与生活事件的作用。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2021 Feb;160:28-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.12.004. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
9
Acute stress enhances tolerance of uncertainty during decision-making.急性应激增强决策时对不确定性的容忍度。
Cognition. 2020 Dec;205:104448. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104448. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
10
Stress-related changes in financial risk taking: Considering joint effects of cortisol and affect.应激相关的财务风险承担变化:考虑皮质醇和情绪的共同作用。
Psychophysiology. 2020 Aug;57(8):e13560. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13560. Epub 2020 Mar 5.