• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲有组织的宫颈癌筛查对宫颈癌死亡率的影响:系统评价。

Effect of organised cervical cancer screening on cervical cancer mortality in Europe: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2020 Mar;127:207-223. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.12.013. Epub 2020 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2019.12.013
PMID:31980322
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Organised cervical cancer (CC) screening programmes are delivered in many different ways across the European Union and its regions. Our aim was to systematically review the impact of these programs on CC mortality.

METHODS

Two independent reviewers identified all eligible studies investigating the effect of organised screening on CC mortality in Europe. Six databases including Embase, Medline and Web of Science were searched (March 2018) with predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Only original studies with at least five years of follow-up were considered. Validated tools were used to assess the risk of bias of the included studies.

RESULTS

Ten observational studies were included: seven cohort and three case-control studies. No randomised controlled trials were found, and there were no eligible studies from the eastern and southern part of Europe. Among the eligible studies, seven were conducted in the twentieth century; they scored lower on the risk of bias assessment. CC mortality reduction for women attending organised screening vs. non-attenders ranged from 41% to 92% in seven studies. Reductions were similar in Western (45-92%) and Northern (41-87%) Europe and were higher in the three more recent studies (66-92%). For invited vs. non-invited women, this reduction ranged from 17% to 79% in five studies.

CONCLUSION

Although data were lacking in Southern and Eastern Europe and the effect size varied between countries and studies, this systematic review provides evidence that organised CC screening reduces CC mortality in those parts of Europe where CC screening was implemented and monitored.

摘要

背景

在欧盟及其地区,组织化的宫颈癌(CC)筛查计划以多种不同方式实施。我们的目的是系统地审查这些计划对 CC 死亡率的影响。

方法

两名独立的审查员确定了所有符合条件的研究,这些研究调查了组织化筛查对欧洲 CC 死亡率的影响。使用预设的纳入和排除标准,从 Embase、Medline 和 Web of Science 等六个数据库中进行了搜索(2018 年 3 月)。仅考虑具有至少五年随访的原始研究。使用经过验证的工具评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。

结果

共纳入了 10 项观察性研究:7 项队列研究和 3 项病例对照研究。未发现随机对照试验,也没有来自东欧和南欧的合格研究。在合格研究中,有 7 项研究是在 20 世纪进行的;它们在偏倚风险评估中得分较低。与未参加组织化筛查的女性相比,参加组织化筛查的女性的 CC 死亡率降低幅度在 7 项研究中为 41%至 92%。在西欧(45-92%)和北欧(41-87%),这种降低是相似的,在 3 项更新的研究中更高(66-92%)。对于被邀请和未被邀请的女性,5 项研究中这一降低幅度从 17%到 79%不等。

结论

尽管在南欧和东欧缺乏数据,且各国和研究之间的效应大小存在差异,但本系统评价提供了证据,表明在实施和监测 CC 筛查的欧洲部分地区,组织化 CC 筛查可降低 CC 死亡率。

相似文献

1
Effect of organised cervical cancer screening on cervical cancer mortality in Europe: a systematic review.欧洲有组织的宫颈癌筛查对宫颈癌死亡率的影响:系统评价。
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Mar;127:207-223. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.12.013. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
2
Evidence for reducing cancer-specific mortality due to screening for breast cancer in Europe: A systematic review.欧洲乳腺癌筛查降低癌症特异性死亡率的证据:系统评价。
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Mar;127:191-206. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.12.010. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
3
Impact of colorectal cancer screening on cancer-specific mortality in Europe: A systematic review.结直肠癌筛查对欧洲癌症特异性死亡率的影响:系统评价。
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Mar;127:224-235. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.12.014. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
4
Cervical cancer mortality in young adult European women.年轻欧洲女性宫颈癌死亡率。
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Feb;126:56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.11.018. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
5
Cervical carcinoma in the European Union: an update on disease burden, screening program state of activation, and coverage as of March 2014.欧盟的宫颈癌:疾病负担、筛查项目启动状态及截至2014年3月的覆盖率最新情况
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Mar;25(3):474-83. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000374.
6
Trends in cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Poland: is there an impact of the introduction of the organised screening?波兰宫颈癌发病率和死亡率的趋势:有组织筛查的引入是否有影响?
Eur J Epidemiol. 2017 Jun;32(6):529-532. doi: 10.1007/s10654-017-0291-6. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
7
The implementation of an organised cervical screening programme in Poland: an analysis of the adherence to European guidelines.波兰有组织的宫颈癌筛查计划的实施:对欧洲指南依从性的分析。
BMC Cancer. 2015 Apr 14;15:279. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1242-9.
8
Cervical cancer screening. Organised screening to avoid unnecessary conisation.宫颈癌筛查。组织筛查以避免不必要的锥切术。
Prescrire Int. 2010 Aug;19(108):172-7, 179.
9
Cervical cancer (over-)screening in Europe: Balancing organised and opportunistic programmes.欧洲的宫颈癌(过度)筛查:平衡有组织和机会性的方案。
Scand J Public Health. 2023 Dec;51(8):1239-1247. doi: 10.1177/14034948221118215. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
10
Human papillomavirus prevalence and type-distribution, cervical cancer screening practices and current status of vaccination implementation in Russian Federation, the Western countries of the former Soviet Union, Caucasus region and Central Asia.人乳头瘤病毒在俄罗斯联邦、前苏联西方国家、高加索地区和中亚的流行情况和型别分布、宫颈癌筛查实践以及疫苗接种实施现状。
Vaccine. 2013 Dec 31;31 Suppl 7:H46-58. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.06.043.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancements in Cervical Cancer Screening: Enhancing HPV Testing and Triage Strategies for Improved Risk Assessment.宫颈癌筛查的进展:加强人乳头瘤病毒检测及分流策略以改善风险评估
Biomedicines. 2025 Jul 18;13(7):1768. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13071768.
2
High-risk human papillomavirus cervical infection prevalence: a nationwide retrospective study comparing opportunistic and organised screening, France, 2020 to 2023.高危型人乳头瘤病毒宫颈感染患病率:一项比较机会性筛查和组织性筛查的全国性回顾性研究,法国,2020年至2023年
Euro Surveill. 2025 Jul;30(28). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2025.30.28.2400689.
3
Are we properly evaluating genetic and genomic testing? A systematic review of health technology assessment reports.
我们是否在正确评估基因检测和基因组检测?对健康技术评估报告的系统综述。
J Transl Med. 2025 Jul 7;23(1):749. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06703-z.
4
The Relationship Between the Health Literacy Levels of Women of Reproductive Age and Their Level of Knowledge About Cancer Screenings.育龄妇女的健康素养水平与其癌症筛查知识水平之间的关系。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Aug;31(5):e70162. doi: 10.1111/jep.70162.
5
Addressing Cancer Screening Disparities in Little Haiti, Miami, USA: A Literature Review on Barriers and Solutions.解决美国迈阿密小海地地区的癌症筛查差异:关于障碍与解决方案的文献综述
Cureus. 2025 May 22;17(5):e84651. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84651. eCollection 2025 May.
6
Perceptions and Barriers to Human Papillomavirus Vaccination and Cervical Cancer Screenings: A Survey Study of Underserved Populations in North Texas.人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种和宫颈癌筛查的认知与障碍:对北德克萨斯州弱势群体的一项调查研究
Public Health Chall. 2024 Dec 18;3(4):e70018. doi: 10.1002/puh2.70018. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
The global burden of polycystic ovary syndrome, endometriosis, uterine fibroids, cervical cancer, uterine cancer, and ovarian cancer from 1990 to 2021.1990年至2021年多囊卵巢综合征、子宫内膜异位症、子宫肌瘤、宫颈癌、子宫癌和卵巢癌的全球负担。
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 14;25(1):1774. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22881-3.
8
Barriers of organized cervical cancer screening in Albania and Montenegro.阿尔巴尼亚和黑山有组织的宫颈癌筛查的障碍。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 24;25(1):1533. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22535-4.
9
Disparities in the Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening in Kuwait: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Nationwide WHO STEPS Survey.科威特宫颈癌筛查接受情况的差异:基于世界卫生组织全球健康行为危险因素监测系统(WHO STEPS)全国性调查的横断面分析
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2025 Mar 1;26(3):861-868. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2025.26.3.861.
10
A Combination of Flavonoids Suppresses Cell Proliferation and the E6 Oncogenic Pathway in Human Papillomavirus-Transformed Cells.类黄酮组合抑制人乳头瘤病毒转化细胞中的细胞增殖和E6致癌途径。
Pathogens. 2025 Feb 24;14(3):221. doi: 10.3390/pathogens14030221.