• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左心室辅助装置植入后右心房压力的时间和趋势与右心衰竭风险的关系。

Timing and Trends of Right Atrial Pressure and Risk of Right Heart Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

机构信息

Cardiovascular Center, Division of Cardiology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

Cardiovascular Center, Division of Cardiology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Card Fail. 2020 May;26(5):394-401. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2020.01.013. Epub 2020 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.cardfail.2020.01.013
PMID:31981695
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11081028/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Elevated right atrial pressure (RAP) is associated with poor outcomes after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. However, the optimal time for RAP measurement and the importance of resolution of right heart congestion prior to LVAD implantation remain unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of 134 consecutive LVAD recipients from our institution. Congestion was defined as RAP ≥ 14 mmHg and was assessed at hospital admission and implant. The primary outcome was death or right ventricular assist device (RVAD) implantation. When stratified by congestion status at admission, congested and non-congested patients had similar event-free survival rates (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.6-2.6). However, when stratified at implant, congested patients had a higher rate death or RVAD implantation (HR: 2.5, 95% CI: 1.1-5.6). Patients were then divided into 4 groups based on their trajectory of congestion status: no congestion, resolved congestion, new congestion, or persistent congestion. Patients with no congestion and resolved congestion had similar outcomes, whereas patients with persistent congestion had a markedly increased rate of death or RVAD implantation (HR: 3.1, 95% CI: 1.3-7.6).

CONCLUSION

RAP at LVAD implantation is more strongly associated with postoperative outcomes than admission RAP. Patients not responsive to decongestive therapies, with persistently elevated RAP, represent a high-risk cohort for adverse outcomes following LVAD implantation.

摘要

背景

左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入后,右心房压(RAP)升高与预后不良相关。然而,RAP 测量的最佳时间以及 LVAD 植入前右心充血是否缓解的重要性尚不清楚。

方法和结果

我们对来自本机构的 134 例连续 LVAD 受者进行了回顾性队列研究。充血定义为 RAP≥14mmHg,并在入院时和植入时进行评估。主要结局为死亡或 RVAD 植入。按入院时充血状态分层,充血和非充血患者的无事件生存率相似(风险比[HR]:1.2,95%置信区间[CI]:0.6-2.6)。然而,按植入时分层,充血患者的死亡或 RVAD 植入率更高(HR:2.5,95%CI:1.1-5.6)。然后根据患者充血状态的轨迹将其分为 4 组:无充血、充血缓解、新发充血或持续充血。无充血和充血缓解患者的结局相似,而持续充血患者的死亡或 RVAD 植入率显著增加(HR:3.1,95%CI:1.3-7.6)。

结论

与入院 RAP 相比,LVAD 植入时的 RAP 与术后结局的相关性更强。对充血治疗无反应、RAP 持续升高的患者,在 LVAD 植入后发生不良结局的风险较高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/862c/11081028/5cb2c5e1619b/nihms-1567453-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/862c/11081028/86161eb47dfd/nihms-1567453-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/862c/11081028/081ca46fb1eb/nihms-1567453-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/862c/11081028/5cb2c5e1619b/nihms-1567453-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/862c/11081028/86161eb47dfd/nihms-1567453-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/862c/11081028/081ca46fb1eb/nihms-1567453-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/862c/11081028/5cb2c5e1619b/nihms-1567453-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Timing and Trends of Right Atrial Pressure and Risk of Right Heart Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.左心室辅助装置植入后右心房压力的时间和趋势与右心衰竭风险的关系。
J Card Fail. 2020 May;26(5):394-401. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2020.01.013. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
2
Early Right Ventricular Assist Device Use in Patients Undergoing Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Incidence and Risk Factors From the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support.接受连续血流左心室辅助装置植入患者早期使用右心室辅助装置:来自机构间机械辅助循环支持注册中心的发生率及危险因素
Circ Heart Fail. 2017 Oct;10(10). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.003863.
3
A Useful Scoring System For Predicting Right Ventricular Assist Device Requirement Among Patients with a Paracorporeal Left Ventricular Assist Device.一种用于预测体外左心室辅助装置患者右心室辅助装置需求的有用评分系统。
Int Heart J. 2018 Sep 26;59(5):983-990. doi: 10.1536/ihj.17-487. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
4
Pulmonary artery pulsatility index predicts right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation.肺动脉搏动指数可预测左心室辅助装置植入后右心衰竭。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016 Jan;35(1):67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2015.06.009. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
5
Can Perioperative Right Ventricular Support Prevent Postoperative Right Heart Failure in Patients With Biventricular Dysfunction Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation?围手术期右心室支持能否预防接受左心室辅助装置植入的双心室功能障碍患者术后右心衰竭?
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016 Jun;30(3):619-26. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.02.023. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
6
Right Atrial Pressure Waveform Predicts Right Ventricular Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.右心房压力波预测左心室辅助装置植入后右心衰竭。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Nov;108(5):1361-1368. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.04.050. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
7
Significance of Residual Mitral Regurgitation After Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.连续血流左心室辅助装置植入术后残余二尖瓣反流的意义。
JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Feb;5(2):81-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.09.014. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
8
Postoperative right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device placement is predicted by preoperative echocardiographic structural, hemodynamic, and functional parameters.左心室辅助装置植入术后右心室衰竭可通过术前超声心动图的结构、血流动力学和功能参数预测。
J Card Fail. 2013 Jan;19(1):16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2012.11.001.
9
Novel percutaneous dual-lumen cannula-based right ventricular assist device provides effective support for refractory right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation.新型经皮双腔套管式右心室辅助装置为左心室辅助装置植入术后难治性右心室衰竭提供有效支持。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020 Apr 1;30(4):499-506. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivz322.
10
Outcome of right ventricular assist device implantation following left ventricular assist device implantation: Systematic review and meta-analysis.左心室辅助装置植入术后右心室辅助装置植入的结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Perfusion. 2022 Nov;37(8):773-784. doi: 10.1177/02676591211024817. Epub 2021 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of diuretic requirement and right heart failure post-LVAD implantation.左心室辅助装置植入术后利尿需求与右心衰竭的关联
JHLT Open. 2024 Mar 9;4:100082. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2024.100082. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Prediction, prevention, and management of right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation: A comprehensive review.左心室辅助装置植入术后右心室衰竭的预测、预防及管理:一项全面综述
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 3;9:1040251. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1040251. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Right Ventricular Failure Post-Implantation of Left Ventricular Assist Device: Prevalence, Pathophysiology, and Predictors.左心室辅助装置植入后右心衰竭:患病率、病理生理学和预测因素。
ASAIO J. 2020 Jun;66(6):610-619. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001088.
2
The Inherent Fallacy of Predicting RV Failure Following Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.预测左心室辅助装置植入术后右心室衰竭的内在谬误
J Card Fail. 2019 Aug;25(8):629-630. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.06.008. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
3
Predictors and Outcomes of Renal Replacement Therapy After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.左心室辅助装置植入术后肾脏替代治疗的预测因素和结局。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Jun;94(6):1003-1014. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.09.021.
4
Evaluation and Management of Right-Sided Heart Failure: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.右心衰竭的评估与管理:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circulation. 2018 May 15;137(20):e578-e622. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000560. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
5
High Right Atrial Pressure and Low Pulse Pressure Predict Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device.高右心房压和低脉压预测左心室辅助装置患者的胃肠道出血。
J Card Fail. 2018 Aug;24(8):487-493. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
6
Early Right Ventricular Assist Device Use in Patients Undergoing Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Incidence and Risk Factors From the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support.接受连续血流左心室辅助装置植入患者早期使用右心室辅助装置:来自机构间机械辅助循环支持注册中心的发生率及危险因素
Circ Heart Fail. 2017 Oct;10(10). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.003863.
7
The effect of preoperative liver dysfunction on cardiac surgery outcomes.术前肝功能不全对心脏手术结局的影响。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Sep 2;12(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13019-017-0636-y.
8
Derivation and Validation of a Novel Right-Sided Heart Failure Model After Implantation of Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices: The EUROMACS (European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support) Right-Sided Heart Failure Risk Score.连续血流左心室辅助装置植入后新型右侧心力衰竭模型的推导和验证:EUROMACS(机械循环支持患者的欧洲登记处)右侧心力衰竭风险评分。
Circulation. 2018 Feb 27;137(9):891-906. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030543. Epub 2017 Aug 27.
9
A new "twist" on right heart failure with left ventricular assist systems.左心室辅助系统致右心衰竭的新“扭曲”。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 Jul;36(7):701-707. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2017.03.014. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
10
Preoperative hepatic dysfunction could predict postoperative mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: Utilization of the MELD scoring system.术前肝功能障碍可预测心脏手术患者的术后死亡率和发病率:终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分系统的应用
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Jan 15;203:682-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.10.181. Epub 2015 Oct 26.