• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神分裂症活跃期信念僵化和草率结论。

Inflexibility of beliefs and jumping to conclusions in active schizophrenia.

机构信息

U.G.C. Salud Mental, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, C/ Dr. Fedriani, n° 3, CP: 41009, Sevilla, España.

U.G.C. Salud Mental, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CIBERSAM/IBIS/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Unidad de Hospitalización de Salud Mental, Avenida Manuel Siurot, s/n, CP: 41013, Sevilla, España.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2020 Feb;284:112776. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112776. Epub 2020 Jan 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112776
PMID:31981941
Abstract

Jumping to conclusions (JTC) has been questioned as sufficient cognitive bias for the onset, maintenance, and severity of delusions compared to the bias of inflexibility of beliefs. The WIT (What is this?) test was designed to evaluate JTC and its capacity for classifying participants into a group of patients with active schizophrenia and a comparison group. It was also attempted to determine whether the presence/absence of answer choices, considered a measure of induced inflexibility of beliefs, influences decision-making and is related to the tendency to repeat the first decision, or spontaneous inflexibility of beliefs. The sample was made up of 160 participants, 80 patients with schizophrenia diagnosed at hospital admission and 80 healthy controls. The Beads Task and the WIT test were administered. The WIT classified the participants reasonably well (82.7%) compared to the Beads Task (86.3%). The presence of answer choices favored JTC (d = 0.33), decreasing the number of lines necessary to make a decision (d = 1.78), and influencing keeping to the original answer (d = 1.36), in interaction with the group (d = 0.42). The WIT test overcame some limitations of the Beads Task. The presence/absence of answer choices influenced decision-making and how thinking was flexibilized, more clearly in the case of controls.

摘要

跳结论(JTC)已被质疑为足够的认知偏差,可导致妄想的发生、维持和严重程度,与信念的不灵活性偏差相比。WIT(这是什么?)测试旨在评估 JTC 及其将参与者分为活跃精神分裂症患者组和对照组的能力。还试图确定是否存在/不存在答案选择,被认为是信念不灵活性的衡量标准,是否会影响决策并与重复第一个决策的趋势或自发的信念不灵活性相关。该样本由 160 名参与者组成,其中 80 名是在入院时被诊断为精神分裂症的患者,80 名是健康对照者。进行了珠子任务和 WIT 测试。与珠子任务(86.3%)相比,WIT 对参与者的分类相当准确(82.7%)。答案选择的存在有利于 JTC(d=0.33),减少了做出决策所需的行数(d=1.78),并影响了对原始答案的坚持(d=1.36),这与组之间存在相互作用(d=0.42)。WIT 测试克服了珠子任务的一些局限性。答案选择的存在/不存在影响决策和思维的灵活性,在对照组中更为明显。

相似文献

1
Inflexibility of beliefs and jumping to conclusions in active schizophrenia.精神分裂症活跃期信念僵化和草率结论。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Feb;284:112776. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112776. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
2
The Effect of Reducing the "Jumping to Conclusions" Bias on Treatment Decision-Making Capacity in Psychosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial With Mediation Analysis.减少“草率结论”偏差对精神病治疗决策能力的影响:一项随机对照试验及中介分析。
Schizophr Bull. 2019 Jun 18;45(4):784-793. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sby136.
3
Reasoning in psychosis: risky but not necessarily hasty.精神病中的推理:有风险但未必草率。
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2016;21(2):91-106. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2015.1136611. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
4
Persecutory delusions: effects of Cognitive Bias Modification for Interpretation and the Maudsley Review Training Programme on social anxiety, jumping to conclusions, belief inflexibility and paranoia.被害妄想:认知偏差修正对解释的影响以及莫兹利回顾训练计划对社交焦虑、草率下结论、信念僵化和偏执狂的影响。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2018 Dec;61:14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 9.
5
Prolonged rather than hasty decision-making in schizophrenia using the box task. Must we rethink the jumping to conclusions account of paranoia?使用箱式任务在精神分裂症中进行延长而非仓促的决策。我们是否必须重新思考对偏执狂的仓促结论解释?
Schizophr Res. 2020 Aug;222:202-208. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2020.05.056. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
6
Examining the influence of self-referential thinking on aberrant salience and jumping to conclusions bias in individuals with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders.探讨自我参照思维对精神分裂谱系障碍个体的异常突显和仓促结论偏差的影响。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2024 Jun;83:101935. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2023.101935. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
7
Jumping to perceptions and to conclusions: specificity to hallucinations and delusions.急于形成认知和得出结论:对幻觉和妄想的特异性。
Schizophr Res. 2014 Apr;154(1-3):68-72. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
8
Unstable Belief Formation and Slowed Decision-making: Evidence That the Jumping-to-Conclusions Bias in Schizophrenia Is Not Linked to Impulsive Decision-making.不稳定的信念形成和决策迟缓:精神分裂症中跳跃式结论偏差与冲动决策无关的证据。
Schizophr Bull. 2022 Mar 1;48(2):347-358. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbab108.
9
Examining reasoning biases in schizophrenia using a modified "Jumping to Conclusions" probabilistic reasoning task.使用改良的“仓促结论”概率推理任务来检查精神分裂症中的推理偏差。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Dec;270:180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.09.020. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
10
Who "jumps to conclusions"? A comprehensive assessment of probabilistic reasoning in psychosis following traumatic brain injury (PFTBI), and comparison with TBI, schizophrenia, and nonclinical controls.谁“急于下结论”?对创伤性脑损伤后精神病性障碍(PFTBI)概率推理的综合评估,并与创伤性脑损伤、精神分裂症和非临床对照进行比较。
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2016;21(1):32-44. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2015.1127221. Epub 2016 Jan 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychotic-Like Reasoning Styles in Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder? An Experimental Investigation of the Jumping to Conclusions Bias.边缘型人格障碍患者类似精神病的推理方式?对妄下结论偏差的实验研究。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2025 Mar-Apr;32(2):e70051. doi: 10.1002/cpp.70051.
2
Reliability and Validity of the Turkish versions of the Davos Assessment of Cognitive Biases Scale (DACOBS) and Cognitive Biases Questionnaire for Psychosis (CBQp).达沃斯认知偏差量表(DACOBS)和精神病认知偏差问卷(CBQp)土耳其语版本的信度和效度
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2024 Nov 19;61(4):324-331. doi: 10.29399/npa.28751. eCollection 2024.
3
Effect of prior beliefs and cognitive deficits on learning in first-episode schizophrenia patients.
先验信念和认知缺陷对首发精神分裂症患者学习的影响。
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2024 Jun 17;38:100318. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2024.100318. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Psychiatrically relevant signatures of domain-general decision-making and metacognition in the general population.普通人群中领域通用决策和元认知的精神相关特征。
Npj Ment Health Res. 2022 Aug 30;1(1):10. doi: 10.1038/s44184-022-00009-4.
5
Excessive teleological thinking is driven by aberrant associations and not by failure of reasoning.过度的目的论思维是由异常联想驱动的,而非推理失误所致。
iScience. 2023 Aug 15;26(9):107643. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107643. eCollection 2023 Sep 15.
6
Criticality in the Healthy Brain.健康大脑中的临界性
Front Netw Physiol. 2022 Jan 18;1:755685. doi: 10.3389/fnetp.2021.755685. eCollection 2021.
7
Effects of Integrated Moral Reasoning Development Intervention for Management of Violence in Schizophrenia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.综合道德推理发展干预对精神分裂症暴力行为管理的影响:一项随机对照试验
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 22;11(5):1169. doi: 10.3390/jcm11051169.
8
Probing the Hypersalience Hypothesis-An Adapted Judge-Advisor System Tested in Individuals With Psychotic-Like Experiences.探究超显著性假说——一种在有类精神病体验个体中进行测试的适应性法官-顾问系统
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 4;12:612810. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.612810. eCollection 2021.
9
Problems in measuring the JTC-bias in patients with psychotic disorders with the fish task: a secondary analysis of a baseline assessment of a randomized controlled trial.在使用鱼类任务评估精神病患者 JTC 偏倚时存在的问题:一项随机对照试验基线评估的二次分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):554. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02959-5.