Department of Clinical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK; Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.
Department of Clinical Oncology, Bristol Cancer Institute, UK.
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Apr;145:146-153. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.12.021. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
To evaluate whether the 8th staging system is a better discriminator of overall survival (OS) than the 7th edition for oropharyngeal cancer patients after definitive (chemo)radiotherapy (CRT).
Data from oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with CRT with curative intent between 2010 and 2016 at Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals were reviewed. Human papillomavirus (HPV) status was ascertained in all cases. Patients were staged using the 7th edition and the 8th edition TNM staging system. Demographics, tumor characteristics and treatment response data were included in univariate and multivariate analysis for OS. OS and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In addition, a multivariate survival Cox regression analysis of several clinical variables was performed.
A total of 273 patients were included. The median follow-up was 4.7 years. Overall 63 patients died. In multivariate analysis, HPV status, complete response at 3 months and ≤21 units/week alcohol were prognostic for OS. For the entire cohort, the 5-year OS and DFS rates were 78.1% (95% confidence interval CI 0.719-0.831) and 73.9% (95% CI 0.677-0.792), respectively. Better stratification of OS and DFS was recorded by 8th edition for the entire cohort. In HPV-positive cases, risk stratification based on tobacco smoking and nodal stage resulted in statistically higher discrimination in OS rates (5-year OS 90.7% in low risk patients and 84.6% in intermediate risk, p = 0.05) and DFS rates (5-year DFS 91.5% in low risk and 76.1% in intermediate risk, p = 0.001).
The 8th edition TNM staging system provides better OS stratification in oropharyngeal cancer after definitive CRT compared with the 7th edition. Other clinical variables, such as complete response at 3 months, alcohol and tobacco smoking, should also be considered in future classifications as they provide additional risk stratification information in both HPV-positive and HPV-negative disease.
评估第八版分期系统是否比第七版更能区分接受根治性(放化疗)后的口咽癌患者的总生存期(OS)。
回顾了 2010 年至 2016 年间在盖伊和圣托马斯医院接受根治性放化疗的口咽癌患者的数据。所有病例均确定了人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)状态。患者使用第七版和第八版 TNM 分期系统进行分期。单变量和多变量分析用于 OS 的人口统计学、肿瘤特征和治疗反应数据。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法估计 OS 和无病生存期(DFS)。此外,还对几个临床变量进行了多变量生存 Cox 回归分析。
共纳入 273 例患者。中位随访时间为 4.7 年。共有 63 例患者死亡。多变量分析显示,HPV 状态、3 个月时完全缓解和≤21 单位/周的酒精摄入量与 OS 相关。对于整个队列,5 年 OS 和 DFS 率分别为 78.1%(95%置信区间 0.719-0.831)和 73.9%(95%置信区间 0.677-0.792)。第八版对整个队列的 OS 和 DFS 进行了更好的分层。在 HPV 阳性病例中,基于吸烟和淋巴结分期的风险分层导致 OS 率(5 年 OS 低危患者为 90.7%,中危患者为 84.6%,p=0.05)和 DFS 率(5 年 DFS 低危患者为 91.5%,中危患者为 76.1%,p=0.001)的统计学差异更高。
与第七版相比,第八版 TNM 分期系统在接受根治性放化疗后的口咽癌中提供了更好的 OS 分层。其他临床变量,如 3 个月时的完全缓解、酒精和吸烟,也应在未来的分类中考虑,因为它们在 HPV 阳性和 HPV 阴性疾病中提供了额外的风险分层信息。