Liu Ying-Mei, Lin Gwan-Ling, Chao Kuo-Yu, Jih Hueyching Janice, Yang Bao-Huan, Chiang Yi-Chien
Department of Nursing, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (Linkou Branch), Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Department of Nursing, Cardinal Tien Junior College of Healthcare and Management, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Nurse Educ Pract. 2020 Feb;43:102707. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102707. Epub 2020 Jan 18.
Pain is a common experience for hospitalized children; however, nursing students are often not adequately trained in pediatric pain management. Innovative teaching strategies, such as e-learning, have been employed for instructing students, however success of these platforms has not been quantitatively measured. This study compared students' knowledge and skill performance following a researcher-designed pain management program administered with three teaching strategies: traditional face-to-face, e-learning, or blended learning. Undergraduate nursing students in Taiwan (N = 296) randomly assigned to one of the teaching strategies participated. Knowledge of pain management, and pain management skills were quantified. A subjective assessment of attitudes towards learning found no significant difference between groups. Knowledge of pediatric pain management did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.36). A 15-item objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) measured the competency of pain management skills; scores were not significantly different, regardless of teaching strategy (p = 0.70). Traditional face-to-face teaching was as effective as both innovative strategies. Evaluating students' skills following a pain management program with an OSCE provided a quantitative assessment of competency. Innovative strategies for teaching pediatric pain management could be a cost-effective way to provide flexible learning opportunities for nursing students who are distant from educational institutions.
疼痛是住院儿童的常见经历;然而,护理专业学生在儿科疼痛管理方面往往未得到充分培训。诸如电子学习等创新教学策略已被用于指导学生,但这些平台的成效尚未进行量化评估。本研究比较了采用三种教学策略(传统面对面教学、电子学习或混合式学习)实施研究人员设计的疼痛管理课程后学生的知识掌握情况和技能表现。台湾的本科护理专业学生(N = 296)被随机分配到其中一种教学策略组参与研究。对疼痛管理知识和疼痛管理技能进行了量化。对学习态度的主观评估发现各组之间无显著差异。各组之间儿科疼痛管理知识无显著差异(p = 0.36)。一项包含15项内容的客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)对疼痛管理技能的能力进行了测评;无论采用何种教学策略,得分均无显著差异(p = 0.70)。传统面对面教学与两种创新教学策略同样有效。通过OSCE对疼痛管理课程后的学生技能进行评估,可对能力进行量化评估。儿科疼痛管理的创新教学策略可能是一种经济有效的方式,能为远离教育机构的护理专业学生提供灵活的学习机会。