Department of Behavioral Health and Nutrition, University of Delaware, Newark, DE.
Psychology Department, Suffolk University, Boston, MA.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2020 May;52(5):553-564. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2019.12.012. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
To examine the direction and magnitude of the relation between family meal frequency and dietary and family functioning outcomes in children (aged 2-18 years).
Systematic literature review with meta-analysis.
Independent electronic searches, 1 for each outcome of interest, were conducted across 5 databases: PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycINFO. Studies were included if they were peer-reviewed and published in English in the US through December 2018.
Diet and family functioning.
Dietary outcomes showed some evidence of a positive association between family meal frequency and fruits, vegetables, fruits and vegetables, sugar-sweetened beverages, and the Healthy Eating Index. There was less clear evidence of this relation in snacks, fast food, and desserts. A positive association was found between family meal frequency or dinner family meal frequency and family functioning outcomes. All studies included had cross-sectional and longitudinal study designs.
There is some evidence to show a positive relation between family meal frequency and dietary outcomes. There is stronger evidence for the relation with family functioning outcomes. Most articles included in the systematic reviews were excluded from meta-analysis owing to inadequate data and high methodological diversity across exposure and outcome variables.
研究儿童(2-18 岁)家庭用餐频率与饮食和家庭功能结果之间的关系方向和程度。
系统文献综述与荟萃分析。
对 5 个数据库(PubMed、Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature、Web of Science、Scopus 和 PsycINFO)进行独立的电子检索,每个感兴趣的结果进行一次检索。纳入标准为同行评议、以英文在美国发表、研究期限为 2018 年 12 月之前的研究。
饮食和家庭功能。
饮食结果显示,家庭用餐频率与水果、蔬菜、水果和蔬菜、含糖饮料和健康饮食指数之间存在正相关关系的一些证据。在零食、快餐和甜点方面,这种关系的证据不太明确。家庭用餐频率或晚餐家庭用餐频率与家庭功能结果之间存在正相关关系。所有纳入的研究均为横断面和纵向研究设计。
有一些证据表明家庭用餐频率与饮食结果之间存在正相关关系。与家庭功能结果的关系更具说服力。由于暴露和结果变量的数据不足且方法学多样性高,系统评价中包含的大多数文章都被排除在荟萃分析之外。