Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Am J Health Promot. 2020 May;34(4):402-417. doi: 10.1177/0890117119895951. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
To explore the selection, use, and reporting of theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs) in implementation studies that promoted healthy eating in center-based childcare.
We searched 11 databases for articles published between January 1990 and October 2018. We also conducted a hand search of studies and consulted subject matter experts.
We included studies in center-based settings for preschoolers that addressed the development, delivery, or evaluation of interventions or implementation strategies related to healthy eating and related subjects and that explicitly used TMF. Exclusion criteria include not peer reviewed or abstracts and not in English, French, German, and Korean.
The first author extracted the data using extraction forms. A second reviewer verified data extraction.
Direct content analysis and narrative synthesis.
We identified 8222 references. We retained 38 studies. Study designs included quasi-experimental, randomized controlled trials, surveys, case studies, and others. The criteria used most often for selecting TMFs were description of a change process (n = 12; 23%) or process guidance (n = 8; 15%). Theories, models, and frameworks used targeted different socioecological levels and purposes. The application of TMF constructs (e.g., factors, steps, outcomes) was reported 69% (n = 34) of times.
Reliance on TMFs focused on individual-level, poor TMF selection, and application and reporting for the development of implementation strategies could limit TMF utility.
探索在促进中心式儿童保育中健康饮食的实施研究中,理论、模型和框架(TMFs)的选择、使用和报告。
我们在 11 个数据库中搜索了 1990 年 1 月至 2018 年 10 月期间发表的文章。我们还对手头的研究进行了搜索,并咨询了主题专家。
我们纳入了针对学龄前儿童的中心式环境中的研究,这些研究涉及与健康饮食和相关主题相关的干预措施或实施策略的制定、实施或评估,并且明确使用了 TMF。排除标准包括未经过同行评审或摘要、非英文、法语、德语和韩语的研究。
第一作者使用提取表格提取数据。第二位审稿人验证了数据提取。
直接内容分析和叙述性综合。
我们确定了 8222 篇参考文献。我们保留了 38 项研究。研究设计包括准实验、随机对照试验、调查、案例研究等。选择 TMF 的最常用标准是描述变化过程(n = 12;23%)或过程指导(n = 8;15%)。使用的理论、模型和框架针对不同的社会生态层次和目的。TMF 结构的应用(例如,因素、步骤、结果)报告了 69%(n = 34)的次数。
对以个体为中心、TMF 选择不佳以及应用和报告有限的 TMF 的依赖,可能会限制 TMF 的实用性。