1 Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia.
2 School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Am J Health Promot. 2019 Mar;33(3):399-411. doi: 10.1177/0890117118786859. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
To assess the effectiveness of an intervention including training, provision of written menu feedback, and printed resources on increasing childcare compliance with nutrition guidelines.
Parallel group randomized controlled trial.
Hunter New England region, New South Wales, Australia.
Forty-four childcare centers that prepare and provide food on-site to children while in care.
The intervention was designed using the Theoretical Domains Framework, targeted managers, and cooks and included implementation strategies that addressed identified barriers.
Outcomes included the proportion of menus providing food servings (per child) compliant with overall nutrition guideline recommendations and each individual food group assessed via menu assessments. Cook knowledge of recommendations, intervention acceptability, adverse events, and barriers were also assessed via questionnaires with cooks and managers.
Logistic regression models, adjusted for baseline values of the outcome.
At baseline and follow-up, zero centers in the intervention and control groups were compliant with the overall menu guidelines or for the vegetable and meat food groups. Follow-up between-group differences in compliance for discretionary (33.3 vs 5, P = .18), dairy (41.7 vs 15, P = .16), breads and cereals (8.3 vs 10 P = 1.00), and fruit (16.7 vs 10, P = .48) were all nonsignificant. Relative to the control group, intervention centers showed a significantly greater increase in percentage of cooks with correct knowledge for vegetable servings (93.3 vs 36.4, P = .008).
Although the application of the theoretical framework produced a broader understanding of the determinants of menu compliance, due to the complexity of guidelines, limited follow-up support, lower training uptake, and low intervention dose, the intervention was not effective in supporting the practice change required.
评估一项干预措施的效果,该措施包括培训、提供书面菜单反馈和印刷资源,以提高儿童保育机构遵守营养指南的情况。
平行组随机对照试验。
澳大利亚新南威尔士州亨特新英格兰地区。
44 家在儿童托管期间现场准备和提供食物的儿童保育中心。
该干预措施是使用理论领域框架设计的,针对管理人员和厨师,并采用了针对已确定障碍的实施策略。
结果包括提供符合整体营养指南建议的食物份量(每个孩子)的菜单比例,以及通过菜单评估评估的每个个别食物组。还通过厨师和管理人员的问卷评估了厨师对建议的了解、干预措施的可接受性、不良事件和障碍。
调整了结果的基线值的逻辑回归模型。
在基线和随访时,干预组和对照组中均没有中心符合整体菜单指南或蔬菜和肉类食物组的要求。随访时,随意性食物(33.3%对 5%,P=0.18)、乳制品(41.7%对 15%,P=0.16)、面包和谷物(8.3%对 10%,P=1.00)和水果(16.7%对 10%,P=0.48)的组间差异均无统计学意义。与对照组相比,干预组的厨师正确了解蔬菜份量的比例显著增加(93.3%对 36.4%,P=0.008)。
尽管应用理论框架更广泛地了解了菜单遵守的决定因素,但由于指南的复杂性、有限的后续支持、较低的培训参与率和较低的干预剂量,该干预措施并未有效地支持所需的实践改变。