Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ.
Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Aug;76(2):143-148. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.11.017. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
In the current era of frequent chest computed tomography (CT) for adult blunt trauma evaluation, many minor injuries are diagnosed, potentially rendering traditional teachings obsolete. We seek to update teachings in regard to thoracic spine fracture by determining how often such fractures are observed on CT only (ie, not visualized on preceding trauma chest radiograph), the admission rate, mortality, and hospital length of stay of thoracic spine fracture patients, and how often thoracic spine fractures are clinically significant.
This was a preplanned analysis of prospectively collected data from the NEXUS Chest CT study conducted from 2011 to 2014 at 9 Level I trauma centers. The inclusion criteria were older than 14 years, blunt trauma occurring within 6 hours of emergency department (ED) presentation, and chest imaging (radiography, CT, or both) during ED evaluation.
Of 11,477 enrolled subjects, 217 (1.9%) had a thoracic spine fracture; 181 of the 198 thoracic spine fracture patients (91.4%) who had both chest radiograph and CT had their thoracic spine fracture observed on CT only. Half of patients (49.8%) had more than 1 level of thoracic spine fracture, with a mean of 2.1 levels (SD 1.6 levels) of thoracic spine involved. Most patients (62%) had associated thoracic injuries. Compared with patients without thoracic spine fracture, those with it had higher admission rates (88.5% versus 47.2%; difference 41.3%; 95% confidence interval 36.3% to 45%), higher mortality (6.3% versus 4.0%; difference 2.3%; 95% confidence interval 0 to 6.7%), and longer length of stay (median 9 versus 6 days; difference 3 days; P<.001). However, thoracic spine fracture patients without other thoracic injury had mortality similar to that of patients without thoracic spine fracture (4.6% versus 4%; difference 0.6%; 95% confidence interval -2.5% to 8.6%). Less than half of thoracic spine fractures (47.4%) were clinically significant: 40.8% of patients received thoracolumbosacral orthosis bracing, 10.9% had surgery, and 3.8% had an associated neurologic deficit.
Thoracic spine fracture is uncommon. Most thoracic spine fractures are associated with other thoracic injuries, and mortality is more closely related to these other injuries than to the thoracic spine fracture itself. More than half of thoracic spine fractures are clinically insignificant; surgical intervention is uncommon and neurologic injury is rare.
在当前频繁进行成人钝性外伤评估的胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)时代,许多轻微损伤被诊断出来,这可能使传统的教学方法过时。我们旨在通过确定仅在 CT 上观察到(即在之前的创伤性胸部 X 光片上未显示)的胸椎骨折的频率、胸椎骨折患者的入院率、死亡率和住院时间,以及胸椎骨折的临床意义如何,来更新有关胸椎骨折的教学内容。
这是对 2011 年至 2014 年在 9 个一级创伤中心进行的 NEXUS 胸部 CT 研究中前瞻性收集的数据进行的预先计划分析。纳入标准为年龄大于 14 岁,创伤后 6 小时内出现钝性外伤,以及在急诊科评估期间进行胸部影像学检查(X 光片、CT 或两者均有)。
在纳入的 11477 名受试者中,217 名(1.9%)有胸椎骨折;198 名同时进行了胸部 X 光片和 CT 检查的胸椎骨折患者中,有 181 名(91.4%)仅在 CT 上观察到胸椎骨折。一半的患者(49.8%)有超过 1 个胸椎骨折水平,平均有 2.1 个(标准差 1.6 个)胸椎受累。大多数患者(62%)有其他的胸部损伤。与无胸椎骨折的患者相比,有胸椎骨折的患者入院率更高(88.5%比 47.2%;差异 41.3%;95%置信区间 36.3%至 45%),死亡率更高(6.3%比 4.0%;差异 2.3%;95%置信区间 0 至 6.7%),住院时间更长(中位数 9 天比 6 天;差异 3 天;P<.001)。然而,无其他胸部损伤的胸椎骨折患者的死亡率与无胸椎骨折的患者相似(4.6%比 4.0%;差异 0.6%;95%置信区间 -2.5%至 8.6%)。不到一半的胸椎骨折(47.4%)具有临床意义:40.8%的患者接受胸腰骶支具固定,10.9%的患者接受手术,3.8%的患者有相关的神经功能缺损。
胸椎骨折并不常见。大多数胸椎骨折与其他胸部损伤有关,死亡率与这些其他损伤的关系比与胸椎骨折本身更密切。超过一半的胸椎骨折无临床意义;手术干预并不常见,神经损伤也很少见。