Department of Surgery, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, UK.
Department of Surgery, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, UK; Institute of Cancer Studies, University of Manchester, UK.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020 May;73(5):913-920. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.11.030. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Oncological skin defects of the extremities and trunk can be challenging. Our modified bipedicled flap utilises the principle of the bipedicled advancement flap, but allows for direct closure of the donor site (as opposed to skin grafting). It does not rely on the preservation of perforators and it random pattern, making it extremely versatile. We aimed to assess the outcomes for patients reconstructed using the modified bipedicled flap technique including oncological safety and complications.
Consecutive patients were retrospectively identified from July 2011 to January 2019 using operative records. Demographics, operative details, oncological data and complications were recorded from patient records and the institution's internal electronic patient records system. No cases, having a modified bipedicled flap, were excluded from this study.
One hundred flaps in 98 patients were included. Mean defect dimensions were 61.7 mm by 33.1 mm. Median length of stay was 1 day, time to discharge from dressing clinic was 15 days, and the length of follow-up was 6.0 years. Eight patients required oral antibiotics for suspected localised wound infection, and 6 patients had minor wound healing problems. There were no cases of flap failure, partial flap loss, returns to theatre for flap-related complications, or local disease recurrence.
To our knowledge, this is the largest series of bipedicled flaps published to date. Our technique is easy to execute, versatile, and allows for direct closure of the secondary defect with excellent cosmetic results. It is oncologically safe, with a low incidence of complications. We commend it for use in the reconstruction of oncological skin defects of the trunk and extremities.
背景/目的:四肢和躯干的肿瘤皮肤缺损可能具有挑战性。我们改良的双蒂皮瓣利用了双蒂推进皮瓣的原理,但允许直接闭合供区(而不是植皮)。它不依赖于穿支血管的保留和其随机模式,因此非常通用。我们旨在评估使用改良双蒂皮瓣技术重建的患者的结果,包括肿瘤安全性和并发症。
使用手术记录,从 2011 年 7 月至 2019 年 1 月连续回顾性地确定了患者。从患者记录和机构内部电子患者记录系统中记录了人口统计学数据、手术细节、肿瘤学数据和并发症。这项研究没有排除任何使用改良双蒂皮瓣的病例。
98 例患者的 100 个皮瓣被纳入研究。平均缺损尺寸为 61.7mm×33.1mm。中位住院时间为 1 天,从包扎门诊出院时间为 15 天,随访时间为 6.0 年。8 例患者因疑似局部伤口感染需要口服抗生素,6 例患者有轻微的伤口愈合问题。无皮瓣失败、部分皮瓣丢失、因皮瓣相关并发症返回手术室或局部疾病复发的病例。
据我们所知,这是迄今为止发表的最大系列双蒂皮瓣。我们的技术易于执行,用途广泛,可以直接闭合二级缺损,美容效果极佳。它具有肿瘤安全性,并发症发生率低。我们推荐其用于重建躯干和四肢的肿瘤性皮肤缺损。