Penmetsa Gautami S, Panda Kausalya Devi, Manthena Anand Kumar Raju, Korukonda Radha Rani, Gadde Praveen
Department of Periodontics and Implantology, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Department of Orthodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh, India.
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2020 Jan-Feb;24(1):32-36. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_378_19. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
The journey in the field of periodontics has destined from macrodentistry to microdentistry. The success of periodontal therapy always depends on better visual access and debridement which are prerequisites for achieving a clean and smooth root surface in attaining new attachment. Magnification is something which provides good hand-eye coordination resulting in better treatment outcomes. The aim of our study is to assess the effectiveness of magnification variable under a surgical operating microscope while performing root planing procedure.
A randomized clinical trial was conducted on 45 patients who were diagnosed with mild-to-moderate chronic periodontitis and were treated under the surgical operating microscope with three different magnification variables (0.4, 0.6, and 1). Plaque index, gingival index (GI), and probing pocket depths (PPDs) were assessed from baseline to 4 weeks, whereas healing index was assessed after 2 weeks of root planing procedure.
The results of our study under the three magnification variables (0.4, 0.6 and 1) have shown no significant reduction in plaque or GI after 4 weeks of therapy. However, a significant reduction PPDs was observed after 4 weeks and improved healing index was observed after 2 weeks under all the three magnification variables with the variable 0.6 demonstrating more effective results.
Even though all the three magnification variables have shown better treatment outcome and ergonomics, 0.6 magnification variable, i.e., ×3.5 - ×5, has demonstrated a more significant effect while performing root planing procedure.
牙周病学领域已从宏观牙科发展到微观牙科。牙周治疗的成功始终取决于更好的视野和清创,这是在实现新附着时获得清洁光滑根面的先决条件。放大倍数有助于实现良好的手眼协调,从而带来更好的治疗效果。我们研究的目的是评估在手术显微镜下进行根面平整操作时不同放大倍数的效果。
对45例诊断为轻至中度慢性牙周炎的患者进行了一项随机临床试验,这些患者在手术显微镜下接受三种不同放大倍数(0.4、0.6和1)的治疗。从基线到4周评估菌斑指数、牙龈指数(GI)和探诊深度(PPD),而在根面平整操作2周后评估愈合指数。
我们在三种放大倍数(0.4、0.6和1)下的研究结果显示,治疗4周后菌斑或GI没有显著降低。然而,4周后观察到PPD显著降低,并且在所有三种放大倍数下,2周后观察到愈合指数有所改善,其中0.6倍放大倍数显示出更有效的结果。
尽管所有三种放大倍数都显示出了更好的治疗效果和人体工程学特性,但在进行根面平整操作时,0.6倍放大倍数(即×3.5 - ×5)显示出了更显著的效果。