Suppr超能文献

亲密伴侣暴力的心理评估

Psychological Assessment of Intimate Partner Violence.

作者信息

Yaxley Robyn, Norris Kimberley, Haines Janet

机构信息

School of Medicine (Psychology), University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay, Australia.

Salamanca Psychology, Hobart, Australia.

出版信息

Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2017 Aug 28;25(2):237-256. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2017.1356211. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Risk assessment is a controversial area of forensic practice, yet it has become an integral part of responding to Intimate Partner Violence (IPV). Given lethal consequences can arise from judicial decisions based on poorly executed risk assessments, it is incumbent on mental health practitioners to utilise best-practice methods and form evidence-based determinations of risk and intervention strategies. This article provides a best-practice guide to IPV risk assessment and summarises available information on the most prevalent IPV risk assessment measures for male and female offenders. The research indicates that caution is warranted as most risk assessment measures have not been normed for use outside North America or for female offenders, have small to moderate effect sizes, and a lack of adherence to administrative procedures and methodical rigour has undermined research findings. Nevertheless, structured risk assessment enhances the defensibility of expert opinion and is recommended.

摘要

风险评估是法医实践中一个颇具争议的领域,但它已成为应对亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)不可或缺的一部分。鉴于基于执行不力的风险评估做出的司法决定可能产生致命后果,心理健康从业者有责任采用最佳实践方法,并基于证据确定风险和干预策略。本文提供了一份IPV风险评估的最佳实践指南,并总结了关于男性和女性罪犯最普遍的IPV风险评估措施的现有信息。研究表明,由于大多数风险评估措施未针对北美以外地区或女性罪犯进行规范,效应量小到中等,且缺乏对行政程序和方法严谨性的遵守削弱了研究结果,因此需要谨慎对待。尽管如此,结构化风险评估增强了专家意见的可辩护性,因此被推荐使用。

相似文献

1
Psychological Assessment of Intimate Partner Violence.
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2017 Aug 28;25(2):237-256. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2017.1356211. eCollection 2018.
2
Adverse Childhood Experiences and Criminal Propensity Among Intimate Partner Violence Offenders.
J Interpers Violence. 2019 Oct;34(19):4137-4161. doi: 10.1177/0886260516674943. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
3
Effectiveness of the IDAP Treatment Program for Male Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence: A Controlled Study of Criminal Recidivism.
J Interpers Violence. 2017 Apr;32(7):1027-1043. doi: 10.1177/0886260515586377. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
4
The Criminogenic and Noncriminogenic Treatment Needs of Intimate Partner Violence Offenders.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2018 Aug;62(11):3247-3259. doi: 10.1177/0306624X17740015. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
6
Incremental prediction of intimate partner violence: An examination of three risk measures.
Law Hum Behav. 2017 Oct;41(5):440-453. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000251. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
7
Intimate partner violence against women in Spain: A medico-legal and criminological study.
J Forensic Leg Med. 2015 Aug;34:119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2015.05.012. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
8
Intimate partner violence in the family: considerations for children's safety.
Child Abuse Negl. 2013 Dec;37(12):1186-91. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.05.005. Epub 2013 Jul 4.
9
Unlocking stories: Older women's experiences of intimate partner violence told through creative expression.
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Oct;24(8):629-637. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12411. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
An Intelligent Clinical Psychological Assessment Method Based on AHP-LSSVR Model.
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Mar 30;2022:7584675. doi: 10.1155/2022/7584675. eCollection 2022.
2
: Analysis of a Femicide Risk Assessment Tool for Abused Women in Brazil.
J Fam Violence. 2022;37(4):547-557. doi: 10.1007/s10896-021-00313-1. Epub 2021 Sep 3.

本文引用的文献

1
The average predictive validity of intimate partner violence risk assessment instruments.
J Interpers Violence. 2013 May;28(7):1537-58. doi: 10.1177/0886260512468250. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
4
Treatment needs of women arrested for domestic violence: a comparison with male offenders.
J Interpers Violence. 2003 Aug;18(8):839-56. doi: 10.1177/0886260503253876.
5
The danger assessment: validation of a lethality risk assessment instrument for intimate partner femicide.
J Interpers Violence. 2009 Apr;24(4):653-74. doi: 10.1177/0886260508317180. Epub 2008 Jul 30.
6
Risk for reassault in abusive female same-sex relationships.
Am J Public Health. 2008 Jun;98(6):1021-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.117770. Epub 2008 Apr 29.
7
How nonrecidivism affects predictive accuracy: evidence from a cross-validation of the Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment (ODARA).
J Interpers Violence. 2009 Feb;24(2):326-37. doi: 10.1177/0886260508316478. Epub 2008 Apr 7.
8
An indepth actuarial assessment for wife assault recidivism: the Domestic Violence Risk Appraisal Guide.
Law Hum Behav. 2008 Apr;32(2):150-63. doi: 10.1007/s10979-007-9088-6. Epub 2007 Jun 2.
10
Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC Area, Cohen's d, and r.
Law Hum Behav. 2005 Oct;29(5):615-20. doi: 10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验