• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Safeguarding Rights to Liberty and Security where People with Disability are Subject to Detention and Restraint: A Practical Approach to the Adjudication, Interpretation and Making of Law (Part Two).保障残疾人被拘留和约束时的自由与安全权利:法律裁决、解释与制定的实用方法(第二部分)
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2018 Jul 2;25(4):550-577. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2018.1467806. eCollection 2018.
2
Safeguarding Rights to Liberty and Security where People with Disability are Subject to Detention and Restraint: A Rights-based Approach (Part One).保障残疾人士在被拘留和约束情况下的自由与安全权利:基于权利的方法(第一部分)
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2018 Jul 9;25(3):465-484. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2018.1467805. eCollection 2018.
3
The right to liberty of persons with psychosocial disabilities at the United Nations: A tale of two interpretations.联合国中具有心理社会残疾人士的自由权利:两种解释的故事。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 Sep-Oct;66:101497. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101497. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
4
The United Kingdom's Coronavirus Act, deprivations of liberty, and the right to liberty and security of the person.英国的《冠状病毒法案》、人身自由的剥夺以及人身自由和安全权。
J Law Biosci. 2020 Apr 29;7(1):lsaa011. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa011. eCollection 2020 Jan-Jun.
5
[Neuroscience in the Courtroom: From responsibility to dangerousness, ethical issues raised by the new French law].[法庭上的神经科学:从责任到危险性,法国新法律引发的伦理问题]
Encephale. 2015 Oct;41(5):385-93. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2014.08.014. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
6
Eliminating mental disability as a legal criterion in deprivation of liberty cases: The impact of the Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities on the insanity defense, civil commitment, and competency law.消除将精神残疾作为剥夺自由案件的法律标准:《残疾人权利公约》对精神错乱辩护、民事收容和行为能力法的影响。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2015 May-Jun;40:36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.04.011. Epub 2015 May 8.
7
"First, do no harm": legal guidelines for health programmes affecting adolescents aged 10-17 who sell sex or inject drugs.“首先,不伤害”:针对影响10至17岁从事性交易或注射毒品青少年的健康项目的法律准则。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2015 Feb 26;18(2 Suppl 1):19437. doi: 10.7448/IAS.18.2.19437. eCollection 2015.
8
Medicare program; revisions to payment policies under the physician fee schedule for calendar year 2003 and inclusion of registered nurses in the personnel provision of the critical access hospital emergency services requirement for frontier areas and remote locations. Final rule with comment period.医疗保险计划;2003日历年医师费率表下支付政策的修订以及将注册护士纳入边远地区和偏远地区急救医院急诊服务人员配备要求。带有意见征求期的最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2002 Dec 31;67(251):79965-80184.
9
Legal issues in maximum security institutions for people with mental illness: liberty, security, and administrative discretion.为患有精神疾病者设立的高度戒备机构中的法律问题:自由、安全与行政自由裁量权。
Behav Sci Law. 2002;20(5):463-80. doi: 10.1002/bsl.505.
10
Restrictive measure reduction in psychiatric wards: A snapshot of China's mental health law reform under the new era of disability rights convention.精神科病房限制措施的减少:新时代残疾权利公约下中国精神卫生法改革的快照。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2024 Mar-Apr;93:101970. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2024.101970. Epub 2024 Feb 24.

保障残疾人被拘留和约束时的自由与安全权利:法律裁决、解释与制定的实用方法(第二部分)

Safeguarding Rights to Liberty and Security where People with Disability are Subject to Detention and Restraint: A Practical Approach to the Adjudication, Interpretation and Making of Law (Part Two).

作者信息

Chandler Kim, White Ben, Willmott Lindy

机构信息

PhD Candidate, Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology.

Professor, Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology.

出版信息

Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2018 Jul 2;25(4):550-577. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2018.1467806. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1080/13218719.2018.1467806
PMID:31984038
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6818348/
Abstract

This is the second article in a two-part series that establishes a framework for evaluating law as it affects the rights to liberty and security for people with intellectual and cognitive impairments. This article uses the rights-based approach developed in the first article to establish a methodology to evaluate the range of ways in which law can be made or interpreted in this area. The methodology considers the adjudication of common law rights by courts, judicial interpretation of statute and the making of laws. Key areas of law considered are those that permit the detention and use of restrictive practices for 'challenging behaviours' or 'behaviours of concern'. The article concludes by arguing that a rights-based approach and a method to assess how law applies it is essential to ensure that a 'thick' rule of law can protect and promote the rights and interests of people with intellectual and cognitive impairments.

摘要

这是一篇分两部分系列文章中的第二篇,该系列文章建立了一个框架,用于评估法律如何影响智力和认知障碍者的自由权和安全权。本文运用第一篇文章中提出的基于权利的方法,建立一种方法论,以评估在这一领域制定或解释法律的各种方式。该方法论考虑法院对普通法权利的裁决、对法规的司法解释以及法律的制定。所考虑的关键法律领域是那些允许对“挑战性行为”或“令人关注的行为”进行拘留和使用限制措施的领域。文章最后指出,基于权利的方法以及评估法律如何适用的方法对于确保“实质”法治能够保护和促进智力和认知障碍者的权益至关重要。