Chandler Kim, White Ben, Willmott Lindy
PhD Candidate, Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology.
Professor, Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology.
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2018 Jul 2;25(4):550-577. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2018.1467806. eCollection 2018.
This is the second article in a two-part series that establishes a framework for evaluating law as it affects the rights to liberty and security for people with intellectual and cognitive impairments. This article uses the rights-based approach developed in the first article to establish a methodology to evaluate the range of ways in which law can be made or interpreted in this area. The methodology considers the adjudication of common law rights by courts, judicial interpretation of statute and the making of laws. Key areas of law considered are those that permit the detention and use of restrictive practices for 'challenging behaviours' or 'behaviours of concern'. The article concludes by arguing that a rights-based approach and a method to assess how law applies it is essential to ensure that a 'thick' rule of law can protect and promote the rights and interests of people with intellectual and cognitive impairments.
这是一篇分两部分系列文章中的第二篇,该系列文章建立了一个框架,用于评估法律如何影响智力和认知障碍者的自由权和安全权。本文运用第一篇文章中提出的基于权利的方法,建立一种方法论,以评估在这一领域制定或解释法律的各种方式。该方法论考虑法院对普通法权利的裁决、对法规的司法解释以及法律的制定。所考虑的关键法律领域是那些允许对“挑战性行为”或“令人关注的行为”进行拘留和使用限制措施的领域。文章最后指出,基于权利的方法以及评估法律如何适用的方法对于确保“实质”法治能够保护和促进智力和认知障碍者的权益至关重要。