• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Safeguarding Rights to Liberty and Security where People with Disability are Subject to Detention and Restraint: A Rights-based Approach (Part One).保障残疾人士在被拘留和约束情况下的自由与安全权利:基于权利的方法(第一部分)
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2018 Jul 9;25(3):465-484. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2018.1467805. eCollection 2018.
2
Safeguarding Rights to Liberty and Security where People with Disability are Subject to Detention and Restraint: A Practical Approach to the Adjudication, Interpretation and Making of Law (Part Two).保障残疾人被拘留和约束时的自由与安全权利:法律裁决、解释与制定的实用方法(第二部分)
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2018 Jul 2;25(4):550-577. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2018.1467806. eCollection 2018.
3
The right to liberty of persons with psychosocial disabilities at the United Nations: A tale of two interpretations.联合国中具有心理社会残疾人士的自由权利:两种解释的故事。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 Sep-Oct;66:101497. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101497. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
4
Eliminating mental disability as a legal criterion in deprivation of liberty cases: The impact of the Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities on the insanity defense, civil commitment, and competency law.消除将精神残疾作为剥夺自由案件的法律标准:《残疾人权利公约》对精神错乱辩护、民事收容和行为能力法的影响。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2015 May-Jun;40:36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.04.011. Epub 2015 May 8.
5
When detainees have a disability: Their rights and fundamental freedoms.当被拘留者存在残疾情况时:他们的权利和基本自由。
Int J Prison Health. 2009;5(3):113-31. doi: 10.1080/17449200903115763.
6
'Environments of concern': reframing challenging behaviour within a human rights approach.“令人关切的环境”:以人权方法重新界定具有挑战性的行为
Int J Dev Disabil. 2023 Feb 1;69(1):95-100. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2022.2118513. eCollection 2023.
7
The United Kingdom's Coronavirus Act, deprivations of liberty, and the right to liberty and security of the person.英国的《冠状病毒法案》、人身自由的剥夺以及人身自由和安全权。
J Law Biosci. 2020 Apr 29;7(1):lsaa011. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa011. eCollection 2020 Jan-Jun.
8
Applying the CRPD to People With Intellectual and Developmental Disability With Behaviors of Concern During COVID-19.在新冠疫情期间,将《残疾人权利公约》应用于有行为问题的智力和发育障碍者。
J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil. 2021 Sep;18(3):197-202. doi: 10.1111/jppi.12374. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
9
Tensions between policy and practice: A qualitative analysis of decisions regarding compulsory admission to psychiatric hospital.政策与实践之间的矛盾:对精神病院强制收治决策的质性分析
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2016 May-Jun;46:50-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2016.02.029. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
10
Throwing Away the Key: The Ethics of Risk Assessment for Preventive Detention Schemes: R.G. Myers Memorial Lecture 2013.扔掉钥匙:预防性拘留计划风险评估的伦理:2013年R.G.迈尔斯纪念讲座
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2014 Sep 3;21(5):779-790. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2014.893551.

引用本文的文献

1
Iatrogenesis in the Context of Residential Dementia Care: A Concept Analysis.居家痴呆症护理背景下的医源性疾病:一项概念分析
Innov Aging. 2022 Apr 21;6(4):igac028. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igac028. eCollection 2022.
2
Applying the CRPD to People With Intellectual and Developmental Disability With Behaviors of Concern During COVID-19.在新冠疫情期间,将《残疾人权利公约》应用于有行为问题的智力和发育障碍者。
J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil. 2021 Sep;18(3):197-202. doi: 10.1111/jppi.12374. Epub 2021 Mar 5.

保障残疾人士在被拘留和约束情况下的自由与安全权利:基于权利的方法(第一部分)

Safeguarding Rights to Liberty and Security where People with Disability are Subject to Detention and Restraint: A Rights-based Approach (Part One).

作者信息

Chandler Kim, White Ben, Willmott Lindy

机构信息

PhD Candidate, Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology.

Professor, Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology.

出版信息

Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2018 Jul 9;25(3):465-484. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2018.1467805. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1080/13218719.2018.1467805
PMID:31984033
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6818222/
Abstract

This is the first article in a two-part series that establishes a framework for evaluating law as it affects the rights to liberty and security for people with intellectual and cognitive impairments. Such laws include those which permit the detention and use of restrictive practices for 'challenging behaviours' or 'behaviours of concern'. This article begins by examining the nature of rights and in particular those of liberty and security. Both are recognised not only as human rights but also as common law rights. The article then develops a rights-based approach to law that protects these rights. Taking a 'thin' version of the rule of law as the starting point, the approach expands this by adding a requirement to respect not only common law rights but human rights. The rights-based approach then argues for the inclusion of the principle of justice requiring the prioritisation of rights over other policy imperatives and a commitment to equal concern and respect.

摘要

这是一个分为两部分的系列文章中的第一篇,该系列文章建立了一个框架,用于评估影响智力和认知障碍者自由权和安全权的法律。这类法律包括那些允许对“挑战性行为”或“令人关切的行为”进行拘留和使用限制措施的法律。本文首先审视权利的本质,尤其是自由权和安全权的本质。这两项权利不仅被视为人权,也被视为普通法权利。然后,本文发展出一种基于权利的法律方法来保护这些权利。该方法以“狭义”的法治概念为起点,并通过增加不仅要尊重普通法权利,还要尊重人权的要求来对其进行扩展。基于权利的方法随后主张纳入正义原则,该原则要求权利优先于其他政策要务,并致力于平等的关切和尊重。