Suppr超能文献

一份用于西班牙人群牙周炎自我报告问卷的有效性

Validity of a self-reported questionnaire for periodontitis in a Spanish population.

作者信息

Saka-Herrán Constanza, Jané-Salas Enric, González-Navarro Beatriz, Estrugo-Devesa Albert, López-López José

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (Dentistry), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Department of Odontostomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (Dentistry), University of Barcelona-Oral Health and Masticatory System Group (Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute) IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

J Periodontol. 2020 Aug;91(8):1027-1038. doi: 10.1002/JPER.19-0604. Epub 2020 Feb 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical examination is the gold-standard approach for surveillance of periodontitis; however, it requires large resources. Several self-reported measures have been developed and tested in diverse scenarios with results suggesting that it may be a useful tool for screening periodontal disease in different populations; yet they have not being tested in Spanish population. We aimed to assess the validity of a self-reported questionnaire for periodontitis in a Spanish population from Barcelona during 2018.

METHODS

One hundred and twelve participants were enrolled in the study and, in one appointment; a dentist performed the self-reported questionnaire and a full-mouth periodontal examination. Periodontitis was defined as at least mild periodontitis according to three criterion of classification. Receiver-operating characteristics curve analyses were used to test the discriminatory capability, sensitivity and specificity of the self-reported questionnaire and logistic regression models were adjusted to estimate the minimal-set of questions associated with periodontitis.

RESULTS

The self-reported questionnaire had a useful discriminative capability for detecting individuals with periodontitis (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.85 95% CI 0.78-0.92) and its moderate/severe form (AUC = 0.86 95% CI 0.79-0.04) with sensitivity and specificity of 77% and 74% and 73% and 87%, respectively; representing moderate validity. The combination of four-specific questions had high accuracy (AUC = 0.88 95% CI 0.81-0.94) and validity (sensitivity = 92.2%) and was strongly associated with moderate/severe periodontitis after adjusting by socio-demographic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of several self-reported questions proved to have a good performance for screening periodontitis in the population under study; specifically, those related with tooth mobility and gum migration. Large community-based studies are needed to test its validity and predictive capability.

摘要

背景

临床检查是监测牙周炎的金标准方法;然而,它需要大量资源。已经开发并在不同场景中测试了几种自我报告的测量方法,结果表明它可能是在不同人群中筛查牙周疾病的有用工具;但尚未在西班牙人群中进行测试。我们旨在评估2018年巴塞罗那西班牙人群中一份牙周炎自我报告问卷的有效性。

方法

112名参与者被纳入研究,在一次就诊中,一名牙医进行了自我报告问卷和全口牙周检查。根据三种分类标准,牙周炎被定义为至少轻度牙周炎。使用受试者工作特征曲线分析来测试自我报告问卷的辨别能力、敏感性和特异性,并调整逻辑回归模型以估计与牙周炎相关的最小问题集。

结果

自我报告问卷在检测牙周炎患者(曲线下面积[AUC]=0.85,95%置信区间0.78-0.92)及其中度/重度形式(AUC=0.86,95%置信区间0.79-0.04)方面具有有用的辨别能力,敏感性和特异性分别为77%和74%以及73%和87%;代表中等有效性。四个特定问题的组合具有较高的准确性(AUC=0.88,95%置信区间0.81-0.94)和有效性(敏感性=92.2%),并且在经社会人口学因素调整后与中度/重度牙周炎密切相关。

结论

事实证明,使用几个自我报告的问题在研究人群中筛查牙周炎具有良好的效果;具体而言,是那些与牙齿松动和牙龈迁移相关的问题。需要进行大规模的基于社区的研究来测试其有效性和预测能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验