Chatzopoulos Georgios S, Tsalikis Lazaros, Konstantinidis Antonios, Kotsakis Georgios A
Division of Periodontology, Department of Developmental and Surgical Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Department of Preventive Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
J Periodontol. 2016 Oct;87(10):1165-73. doi: 10.1902/jop.2016.160043. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
The assessment of periodontitis and treatment needs is primarily based on clinical and radiographic examinations. Albeit effective in predicting treatment needs, these examinations are costly, time-consuming, and impractical for assessing population-level needs. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate a two-domain self-report questionnaire for rapid periodontitis screening.
Six hundred white adult individuals, dentate or partially dentate and seeking dental therapy at a university clinic, underwent oral examination utilizing the full-mouth Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs (CPITN). To assess predictive value of self-reported periodontal measures (SRPMs) for periodontitis screening, four questions were formulated. Two questions aimed to assess "dentist-diagnosed periodontal disease" and two inquired about "self-assessed periodontitis." Multiple logistic regression models were used to construct receiver-operating characteristic curves, and predictor selection was performed via a forward stepwise selection process.
Five hundred thirty-five volunteers with a mean age of 50.1 years elected to respond to SRPMs via telephone interview. After oral examination, 17.8% of participants were assessed as having CPITN = 4, representing compromised periodontal status. Sensitivity and specificity for correctly classifying compromised periodontal status ranged from 5.3% to 72.6%, and 87.8% to 99.5% for individual SRPMs. Sensitivity and specificity were increased when combining a measure of self-assessed periodontal disease and a measure of dentist-diagnosed disease as predictors. Addition of age and sex maximized sensitivity/specificity at 82.1%/82.2%. Diabetic status, smoking, and body mass index did not enhance the prediction.
A two-domain self-report measure combining two self-report items with age and sex has good sensitivity and specificity for periodontitis screening in a white, university-based population. The proposed self-report measure can be valuable for periodontitis screening in resource-limited settings where gold standard clinical examination may not be pragmatic. Further validation studies are required to assess whether findings from this study are context-specific.
牙周炎及治疗需求的评估主要基于临床和影像学检查。尽管这些检查在预测治疗需求方面有效,但成本高昂、耗时且不适用于评估群体水平的需求。本研究的目的是评估一份用于快速筛查牙周炎的双领域自我报告问卷。
600名牙齿健全或部分牙齿缺失且在大学诊所寻求牙科治疗的成年白人接受了使用全口社区牙周治疗需求指数(CPITN)的口腔检查。为评估自我报告的牙周测量指标(SRPMs)对牙周炎筛查的预测价值,设计了四个问题。两个问题旨在评估“牙医诊断的牙周疾病”,另外两个询问“自我评估的牙周炎”。使用多元逻辑回归模型构建受试者工作特征曲线,并通过向前逐步选择过程进行预测指标选择。
535名平均年龄为50.1岁的志愿者选择通过电话访谈回答SRPMs。口腔检查后,17.8%的参与者被评估为CPITN = 4,代表牙周状况受损。个体SRPMs正确分类牙周状况受损的敏感性和特异性范围分别为5.3%至72.6%和87.8%至99.5%。将自我评估的牙周疾病指标和牙医诊断的疾病指标作为预测指标结合使用时,敏感性和特异性有所提高。加入年龄和性别后,敏感性/特异性最高可达82.1%/82.2%。糖尿病状态、吸烟和体重指数并未增强预测效果。
在以大学为基础的白人人群中,一种将两个自我报告项目与年龄和性别相结合的双领域自我报告测量方法对牙周炎筛查具有良好的敏感性和特异性。在资源有限的环境中,当金标准临床检查可能不切实际时,所提出的自我报告测量方法对于牙周炎筛查可能具有重要价值。需要进一步的验证研究来评估本研究结果是否具有特定背景。