Suppr超能文献

在救护车转运期间进行即时心肌钙蛋白检测以诊断急性心肌梗死。

Point-of-Care Troponin Testing during Ambulance Transport to Detect Acute Myocardial Infarction.

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2020 Nov-Dec;24(6):751-759. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2020.1721740. Epub 2020 Mar 3.

Abstract

Use of point-of-care (POC) troponin (cTn) testing in the Emergency Department (ED) is well established. However, data examining POC cTn measurement in the prehospital setting, during ambulance transport, are limited. The objective of this study was to prospectively test the performance of POC cTn measurement by paramedics to detect myocardial infarction (MI) among patients transported to the ED for acute chest pain. A prospective cohort study of adults with non-traumatic chest pain was conducted in three Emergency Medical Services agencies (December 2016 to January 2018). Patients with ST-elevation MI on ECG were excluded. During ambulance transport paramedics initiated intravenous access, collected blood, and used a POC device (i-STAT; Abbott Laboratories) to measure cTn. Following ED arrival, participants received standard evaluations including clinical blood draws for cTn measurement in the hospital central lab (AccuTnI +3 assay; Beckman Coulter, or cTnI-Ultra assay; Siemens). Blood collected during ambulance transport was also analyzed for cTn in the central lab. Index visit MI was adjudicated by 3 experts using central lab cTn measures from the patient's clinical blood draws. Test characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values) for detection of MI were calculated for POC and central lab cTn measurement of prehospital blood and compared with McNemar's test. During the study period prehospital POC cTn results were obtained on 421 patients, of which 5.0% (21/421) had results >99th percentile upper reference limit. MI was adjudicated in 16.2% (68/421) during the index visit. The specificity and positive predictive value of the POC cTn measurement were 99.2% (95% CI 97.5-99.8%) and 85.7% (95% CI 63.7-97.0%) for MI. However, the sensitivity and NPV of prehospital POC cTn were 26.5% (95% CI 16.5-38.6%) and 87.5% (95% CI 83.9-90.6%). Compared to POC cTn, the central lab cTn measurement of prehospital blood resulted in a higher sensitivity of 67.9% (95% CI 53.7-80.1%,  < 0.0001), but lower specificity of 92.4% (95% CI 88.4-95.4%,  = 0.0001). Prehospital POC i-STAT cTn measurement in patients transported with acute chest pain was highly specific for MI but had low sensitivity. This suggests that prehospital i-STAT POC cTn could be useful to rule-in MI, but should not be used to exclude MI.

摘要

在急诊部(ED)中使用即时护理(POC)肌钙蛋白(cTn)检测已得到充分证实。然而,在院前环境中,在救护车转运期间进行的 POC cTn 测量数据有限。本研究的目的是前瞻性测试护理人员在救护车转运期间进行 POC cTn 测量,以检测因急性胸痛而转运至 ED 的患者是否患有心肌梗死(MI)。

这是一项在三个紧急医疗服务机构(2016 年 12 月至 2018 年 1 月)中进行的非创伤性胸痛成人的前瞻性队列研究。心电图上有 ST 段抬高 MI 的患者被排除在外。在救护车转运期间,护理人员开始静脉通路,采集血液,并使用 POC 设备(i-STAT;雅培实验室)测量 cTn。在 ED 到达后,参与者接受了标准评估,包括在医院中心实验室进行临床血液采集以测量 cTn(AccuTnI +3 检测法;贝克曼库尔特,或 cTnI-Ultra 检测法;西门子)。在中心实验室也分析了在救护车转运期间采集的血液中的 cTn。通过三位专家使用患者临床血液采集的中心实验室 cTn 测量值来确定索引就诊 MI 的诊断。使用 McNemar 检验比较了 POC 和中心实验室院前血液 cTn 测量的 MI 检测的特征(敏感性、特异性和预测值)。

在研究期间,对 421 名患者进行了院前 POC cTn 检测,其中 5.0%(21/421)的结果> 99 百分位上限。在索引就诊时,68 例(68/421)被诊断为 MI。POC cTn 测量的特异性和阳性预测值分别为 99.2%(95%CI 97.5-99.8%)和 85.7%(95%CI 63.7-97.0%)。然而,院前 POC cTn 的敏感性和阴性预测值分别为 26.5%(95%CI 16.5-38.6%)和 87.5%(95%CI 83.9-90.6%)。与 POC cTn 相比,中心实验室的院前血液 cTn 测量结果具有更高的敏感性(67.9%,95%CI 53.7-80.1%, < 0.0001),但特异性较低(92.4%,95%CI 88.4-95.4%, = 0.0001)。

在患有急性胸痛的患者中进行的院前 POC i-STAT cTn 测量对 MI 具有高度特异性,但敏感性较低。这表明院前 i-STAT POC cTn 可用于辅助 MI 的诊断,但不能用于排除 MI。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验