Dua Anterpreet, Collier Sara A., Garcia Karolain, Kumar Sanjeev
Augusta University
Oklahoma Dept of Corrections
Chronic neuropathic pain remains a challenging and often debilitating condition, affecting millions worldwide and significantly impairing quality of life and functional capacity. For patients with refractory pain unresponsive to pharmacologic therapy, physical rehabilitation, and less invasive interventions, neuromodulation has emerged as a pivotal therapeutic strategy. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS), first introduced in the late 1960s, uses pulsed electrical energy near the spinal cord to modulate pain signaling and provide durable analgesia. Initially, this technique delivered pulsed energy in the intrathecal space. Still, modern neuromodulation now involves the implantation of leads within the epidural space, allowing more precise and sustained stimulation of the dorsal columns. SCS represents part of a broader family of neurostimulation modalities—such as deep brain stimulation and peripheral nerve stimulation—that apply electrical energy to the central or peripheral nervous system to modify pathologic pain signaling. The theoretical foundation of SCS originated from the gate control theory of pain proposed by Melzack and Wall, which posits that pain impulses provoked in the periphery and carried by small, slow-conducting C fibers and A-delta fibers can be interrupted by stimulating larger, fast-conducting A-beta fibers. Because these afferent pathways converge at the substantia gelatinosa of the dorsal horn, activation of A-beta fibers effectively “closes the gate” to ascending noxious stimuli, thereby attenuating the perception of pain. This mechanism highlights the intricate interplay between multiple pain systems, each comprising integrative neuronal networks that convey both excitatory and inhibitory signals across nociceptors. Nociceptors initially detect noxious thermal, chemical, or mechanical stimuli in the periphery and transmit this information to second-order neurons in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. These signals are then relayed via projection neurons to higher centers in the brainstem and cortex, where the sensation and emotional context of pain are ultimately perceived and modulated. Over the past 2 decades, rapid technological advancements, including the development of high-frequency stimulation, burst waveforms, and closed-loop feedback systems, have substantially expanded the clinical utility and efficacy of SCS. Indications now encompass complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS), peripheral neuropathies, ischemic limb pain, and painful diabetic neuropathy, among others. Randomized controlled trials and long-term observational studies have consistently demonstrated significant reductions in pain intensity, improvements in function and quality of life, and reductions in opioid utilization in appropriately selected patients. Despite these advances, challenges persist in patient selection, optimizing stimulation parameters, and managing complications such as lead migration, infection, and hardware failure. Furthermore, the economic implications of SCS, as well as its integration into multidisciplinary pain management, remain areas of active investigation. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current evidence, technological developments, clinical indications, outcomes, and future directions in spinal cord stimulation, with an emphasis on emerging therapies and strategies to optimize patient-centered care.
脊髓刺激利用脊髓附近的脉冲电能来控制疼痛。最初,该技术在鞘内空间施加脉冲能量。目前,神经调节涉及将导线植入硬膜外间隙。类似的原理分别在深部/皮层脑刺激和周围神经刺激中利用中枢神经系统和周围神经系统刺激。神经刺激方式的出现是为了应对梅尔扎克和沃尔的疼痛闸门控制理论。总之,他们提出,由C纤维和A-δ纤维传导的外周引发的疼痛冲动,可以通过刺激较大的A-β纤维来阻断。这种阻断在背角胶状质的共同神经突触位置得以促进。换句话说,对触觉和振动神经的刺激“关闭了闸门”,阻止了携带有害疼痛刺激向脑上传导的疼痛冲动。多种疼痛系统负责疼痛的感知;这些系统由整合神经元集合组成(在伤害感受器上传导兴奋性或抑制性信号)。这三个系统之间的相互关系决定了所感知到的疼痛感觉以及与之相关的反应。首先,伤害感受器接收有害温度、化学或机械刺激的信号(外周神经元)。它们将这些信息发送到位于脊髓中的二级神经元,主要是背角(中枢通路),然后通过投射神经元传递到脑干(整合神经元)。1. 无髓鞘的C纤维和轻度髓鞘化的A-β纤维(传导疼痛的小伤害性纤维)。2. 有髓鞘的A-β纤维(传导触觉、压力和振动的大非伤害性纤维)。3. 中枢通路(将神经元信号中继到更高的脑结构):大脑中的主要整合部位是丘脑,但其他结构也参与对疼痛的反应。一旦大脑接收到疼痛信号,几乎会立即产生几种反应来修改并对这些信号做出反应。这些反应包括但不限于躯体和自主反射、增加或减轻疼痛的负反馈或正反馈、内分泌和情绪反应、皮层意识或疼痛,以及对该事件的记忆。上述疼痛闸门控制理论与这些疼痛系统直接相关。它表明C纤维、A-δ纤维(伤害性)和A-β纤维(非伤害性)都可以将来自损伤部位的信息传递到脊髓背角的两种不同细胞类型,即传递细胞和抑制性神经元。伤害性和非伤害性纤维都可以激活传递细胞,打开发送到大脑的信号闸门。然而,只有非伤害性纤维可以激活抑制性细胞,从而关闭闸门。尽管闸门控制理论是最初的指导作用机制,但现代研究表明其潜在机制尚未完全清楚。有证据表明,与缺血性疼痛相比,背柱刺激在用于神经性疼痛时应用了不同的镇痛机制。在神经性疼痛中,证据表明通过改变局部神经化学,刺激通过增加GABA和血清素的释放来抑制广动力范围神经元的过度兴奋性,从而抑制兴奋性细胞因子谷氨酸和天冬氨酸的水平。另一方面,目前认为缺血性疼痛的缓解是通过改变交感神经张力实现的,这是通过恢复有利的氧供需平衡来实现的。