• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

陷阱禁闭对两种陆生啮齿动物个性测量的影响。

Effects of trap confinement on personality measurements in two terrestrial rodents.

机构信息

Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Conservation Biology, University of Maine, Orono, ME, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Jan 27;15(1):e0221136. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221136. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0221136
PMID:31986141
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6984697/
Abstract

In recent years, consistent individual differences in behavior, or personalities, have been a topic of increasing interest as researchers strive to understand and predict the responses of individuals and populations to anthropogenic changes. Behavioral studies in wild populations often require that animals are live trapped before behavioral observation can occur, and this is especially true in studies investigating animal personalities. However, it is unknown whether the amount of time confined to a live trap may regulate the behavior of trapped individuals. Specifically, if the duration of trap confinement directly influences behavior, then by obtaining wild animals through live trapping we may be confounding the very measurements of greatest interest. To investigate whether the duration of trap confinement influences the behavior of trapped individuals, we performed a study on two small mammal species, focusing specifically on personality traits. We positioned high-definition trail cameras facing Longworth small mammal traps in the field to observe capture events and record the time of capture. We then measured personality in captured deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) and southern red-backed voles (Myodes gapperi) using three standardized tests, and through linear and generalized linear models we found that the time an animal had spent confined to a trap before testing did not affect 86% of behaviors exhibited. Our results showed two weak behavioral effects of confinement duration on boldness and docility resulting from an interaction between the duration of confinement and whether or not an individual was naïve to trapping. Our results suggest that behavioral measurements of wild, trapped small mammals are not determined by the time spent confined to a trap. However, researchers should use caution and consider whether an animal is naïve to trapping during analysis since habituation to the live trap may play a role in the effects of confinement duration on behavior.

摘要

近年来,行为或个性的一致性个体差异一直是研究人员越来越感兴趣的话题,他们努力理解和预测个体和群体对人为变化的反应。在野外种群中进行行为研究时,通常需要对动物进行活捕,然后才能进行行为观察,而在研究动物个性时更是如此。然而,目前尚不清楚被活捕困住的时间长短是否会调节被捕动物的行为。具体来说,如果被困时间直接影响行为,那么通过活捕获取野生动物,可能会混淆我们最感兴趣的测量结果。为了研究被困时间是否会影响被捕个体的行为,我们对两种小型哺乳动物物种进行了研究,特别关注个性特征。我们在野外将高清轨迹摄像机对准朗沃思小型哺乳动物陷阱,以观察捕获事件并记录捕获时间。然后,我们使用三个标准化测试来测量被捕的鹿鼠(Peromyscus maniculatus)和南方红背田鼠(Myodes gapperi)的个性,并通过线性和广义线性模型发现,在测试之前,动物被限制在陷阱中的时间长短并不影响 86%的表现行为。我们的结果表明,由于被限制时间和个体是否对陷阱陌生之间的相互作用,限制时间对大胆和温顺的两个弱行为效应。我们的结果表明,被活捕困住的野生小型哺乳动物的行为测量结果不受被限制在陷阱中的时间长短的影响。然而,研究人员在分析时应谨慎考虑动物是否对陷阱陌生,因为对活捕的习惯可能会影响限制时间对行为的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cfe/6984697/9605335db482/pone.0221136.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cfe/6984697/5ef34a944f47/pone.0221136.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cfe/6984697/c3a3c4437c9f/pone.0221136.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cfe/6984697/9605335db482/pone.0221136.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cfe/6984697/5ef34a944f47/pone.0221136.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cfe/6984697/c3a3c4437c9f/pone.0221136.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cfe/6984697/9605335db482/pone.0221136.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of trap confinement on personality measurements in two terrestrial rodents.陷阱禁闭对两种陆生啮齿动物个性测量的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 27;15(1):e0221136. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221136. eCollection 2020.
2
Effect of capture and season on fecal glucocorticoid levels in deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) and red-backed voles (Clethrionomys gapperi).捕获和季节对鹿鼠(白足鼠)和红背田鼠粪便中糖皮质激素水平的影响。
Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2001 Sep;123(3):337-44. doi: 10.1006/gcen.2001.7682.
3
Pilfering personalities: Effects of small mammal personality on cache pilferage.偷窃个性:小型哺乳动物个性对贮藏物偷窃行为的影响。
J Anim Ecol. 2025 Mar;94(3):291-302. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.14059. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
4
Environmental heterogeneity modifies the link between personality and survival in fluctuating small mammal populations.环境异质性改变了在波动的小哺乳动物种群中个性与生存之间的联系。
J Anim Ecol. 2024 Feb;93(2):196-207. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.14037. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
5
Land-use change alters associations between personality and microhabitat selection.土地利用变化改变了人格与小生境选择之间的关联。
Ecol Appl. 2021 Dec;31(8):e02443. doi: 10.1002/eap.2443. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
6
Wild boar behaviour during live-trap capture in a corral-style trap: implications for animal welfare.圈栏式陷阱活捕野猪时的行为:对动物福利的影响。
Acta Vet Scand. 2020 Nov 10;62(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13028-020-00557-9.
7
Do bank voles (Myodes glareolus) trapped in live and lethal traps show differences in tick burden?活捕和致死陷阱捕获的林姬鼠(Myodes glareolus)身上的蜱虫负担是否存在差异?
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 17;15(9):e0239029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239029. eCollection 2020.
8
It's a trap: Optimizing detection of rare small mammals.这是一个陷阱:优化稀有小型哺乳动物的检测。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 5;14(3):e0213201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213201. eCollection 2019.
9
Changes in Trap Temperature as a Method to Determine Timing of Capture of Small Mammals.作为确定小型哺乳动物捕获时间的一种方法,陷阱温度的变化
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 28;11(10):e0165710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165710. eCollection 2016.
10
Refining animal welfare of wild boar (Sus scrofa) corral-style traps through behavioral and pathological investigations.通过行为学和病理学研究来提高野猪(Sus scrofa)围栏式陷阱的动物福利。
PLoS One. 2024 May 21;19(5):e0303458. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303458. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
A behavioral study of live captured coypu () and raccoons () with respect to animal welfare.一项关于圈养的河狸和浣熊动物福利的行为学研究。
Front Vet Sci. 2025 Jul 30;12:1619604. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1619604. eCollection 2025.
2
Staying Alive: Individual Behavioral Variation Influences Survival, but Not Reproductive Success, in Female Group-Living Ground Squirrels.生存之道:群体生活的雌性地松鼠中,个体行为差异影响生存,但不影响繁殖成功率。
Ecol Evol. 2025 Jul 28;15(8):e71861. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71861. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Animal-friendly behavioral testing in field studies: examples from ground squirrels.

本文引用的文献

1
Land-use change and the ecological consequences of personality in small mammals.土地利用变化与小型哺乳动物个性的生态后果。
Ecol Lett. 2019 Sep;22(9):1387-1395. doi: 10.1111/ele.13324. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
2
Predator-driven natural selection on risk-taking behavior in anole lizards.捕食者驱动的冒险行为的自然选择在安乐蜥中。
Science. 2018 Jun 1;360(6392):1017-1020. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9289.
3
The influence of spatiotemporal conditions and personality on survival in reintroductions-evolutionary implications.时空条件和个性对再引入过程中生存的影响——进化意义
野外研究中对动物友好的行为测试:来自地松鼠的实例
Front Behav Neurosci. 2023 Aug 23;17:1239774. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1239774. eCollection 2023.
4
Effects of the Density of Invasive Plants on the Biodiversity of Large and Small Mammals in the Groenkloof Nature Reserve (GNR) in South Africa.南非格伦克洛芙自然保护区(GNR)入侵植物密度对大型和小型哺乳动物生物多样性的影响
Biology (Basel). 2023 Feb 13;12(2):296. doi: 10.3390/biology12020296.
5
Role of bank vole (Myodes glareolus) personality on tick burden (Ixodes spp.).黑线姬鼠(Myodes glareolus)个性对蜱虫负担(Ixodes spp.)的影响。
Folia Parasitol (Praha). 2022 Jul 12;69:2022.014. doi: 10.14411/fp.2022.014.
6
Small mammal personalities generate context dependence in the seed dispersal mutualism.小型哺乳动物个性在种子扩散共生关系中产生情境依赖性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Apr 12;119(15):e2113870119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2113870119. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
7
Ecological correlates of the morphology of the auditory bulla in rodents: Application to the fossil record.啮齿动物听觉泡形态的生态学相关性:在化石记录中的应用。
J Anat. 2022 Apr;240(4):647-668. doi: 10.1111/joa.13579. Epub 2021 Nov 7.
8
Environmental heterogeneity and population density affect the functional diversity of personality traits in small mammal populations.环境异质性和种群密度会影响小型哺乳动物种群中个性特征的功能多样性。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Dec 9;287(1940):20201713. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1713.
9
Correction: Effects of trap confinement on personality measurements in two terrestrial rodents.更正:陷阱限制对两种陆生啮齿动物个性测量的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 13;15(2):e0229220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229220. eCollection 2020.
Oecologia. 2017 Jan;183(1):45-56. doi: 10.1007/s00442-016-3740-0. Epub 2016 Oct 8.
4
Meanings of self-grooming depend on an inverted U-shaped function with aversiveness.自我梳理的意义取决于与厌恶感呈倒U形的函数关系。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016 Sep;17(9):591. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.102. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
5
Urbanization and biological invasion shape animal personalities.城市化和生物入侵塑造动物个性。
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Feb;23(2):592-603. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13395. Epub 2016 Jul 30.
6
The power of personality.个性的力量。
Science. 2016 May 6;352(6286):644-7. doi: 10.1126/science.352.6286.644. Epub 2016 May 5.
7
Neurobiology of rodent self-grooming and its value for translational neuroscience.啮齿动物自我梳理行为的神经生物学及其在转化神经科学中的价值。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016 Jan;17(1):45-59. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2015.8. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
8
A systematic survey of the integration of animal behavior into conservation.对动物行为融入保护工作的系统调查。
Conserv Biol. 2016 Aug;30(4):744-53. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12654. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
9
Selection on female behaviour fluctuates with offspring environment.对雌性行为的选择会随着后代环境的变化而波动。
J Evol Biol. 2014 Nov;27(11):2308-21. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12495. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
10
The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis.行为的可重复性:一项荟萃分析。
Anim Behav. 2009 Apr 1;77(4):771-783. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.12.022.