Department of Emergency Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No 88, Jiefang Rd, Hangzhou, China.
Department of Nursing, The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No 88, Jiefang Rd, Hangzhou, China.
J Crit Care. 2020 Apr;56:249-256. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.01.018. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
The aim of this study was to explore the effects of an enteral nutrition (EN) feeding protocol in critically ill patients.
This was a prospective multi-center before-after study. We compared energy related and prognostic indicators between the control group (pre-implementation stage) and intervention group (post-implementation stage). The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients receiving EN within 7 days after ICU admission.
209 patients in the control group and 230 patients in the intervention group were enrolled. The implementation of the EN protocol increased the percentage of target energy reached from day 3 to day 7, and the difference between two groups reached statistical significance in day 6 (P = .01) and day 7 (P = .002). But it had no effects on proportion of patient receiving EN (P = .65) and start time of EN (P = .90). The protocol application might be associated with better hospital survival (89.1% vs 82.8%, P = .055) and reduce the incidence of EN related adverse (P = .004). There was no difference in ICU length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU cost.
The implementation of the enteral feeding protocol is associated with improved energy intake and a decreased incidence of enteral nutrition related adverse events for critically ill patients, but it had no statistically beneficial effects on reducing the hospital mortality rate. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02976155. Registered November 29, 2016- Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02976155.
本研究旨在探讨肠内营养(EN)喂养方案对危重症患者的影响。
这是一项前瞻性多中心前后对照研究。我们比较了对照组(实施前阶段)和干预组(实施后阶段)的能量相关和预后指标。主要终点是 ICU 入院后 7 天内接受 EN 的患者比例。
对照组纳入 209 例患者,干预组纳入 230 例患者。EN 方案的实施增加了第 3 天至第 7 天达到目标能量的患者比例,第 6 天(P=0.01)和第 7 天(P=0.002)两组间差异具有统计学意义。但对接受 EN 的患者比例(P=0.65)和 EN 开始时间(P=0.90)无影响。该方案的应用可能与更好的住院生存率(89.1%比 82.8%,P=0.055)和降低 EN 相关不良事件的发生率(P=0.004)相关。但 ICU 住院时间、机械通气时间和 ICU 费用无差异。
肠内喂养方案的实施与危重症患者能量摄入的增加和肠内营养相关不良事件发生率的降低有关,但在降低住院死亡率方面无统计学获益。
ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT02976155。注册日期:2016 年 11 月 29 日-回顾性注册,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02976155。