Suppr超能文献

识别记忆的不等方差信号检测模型:检验编码变异性假设。

The unequal variance signal-detection model of recognition memory: Investigating the encoding variability hypothesis.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Aug;73(8):1242-1260. doi: 10.1177/1747021820906117. Epub 2020 Feb 27.

Abstract

Despite the unequal variance signal-detection (UVSD) model's prominence as a model of recognition memory, a psychological explanation for the unequal variance assumption has yet to be verified. According to the encoding variability hypothesis, old item memory strength variance (σ) is greater than that of new items because items are incremented by variable, rather than fixed, amounts of strength at encoding. Conditions that increase encoding variability should therefore result in greater estimates of σ. We conducted three experiments to test this prediction. In Experiment 1, encoding variability was manipulated by presenting items for a fixed or variable (normally distributed) duration at study. In Experiment 2, we used an attentional manipulation whereby participants studied items while performing an auditory one-back task in which distractors were presented at fixed or variable intervals. In Experiment 3, participants studied stimuli with either high or low variance in word frequency. Across experiments, estimates of σ were unaffected by our attempts to manipulate encoding variability, even though the manipulations weakly affected subsequent recognition. Instead, estimates of σ tended to be positively correlated with estimates of the mean difference in strength between new and studied items (), as might be expected if σ generally scales with . Our results show that it is surprisingly hard to successfully manipulate encoding variability, and they provide a signpost for others seeking to test the encoding variability hypothesis.

摘要

尽管不等方差信号检测(UVSD)模型作为一种识别记忆模型具有重要地位,但该模型中不等方差假设的心理学解释尚未得到验证。根据编码变化假说,旧项目记忆强度方差(σ)大于新项目的记忆强度方差,因为在编码时项目的强度是通过可变而不是固定的量增加的。因此,应该增加编码变化的条件会导致更大的 σ 估计值。我们进行了三项实验来检验这一预测。在实验 1 中,通过在学习时呈现固定或可变(正态分布)持续时间的项目来操纵编码变化。在实验 2 中,我们使用了一种注意力操纵,参与者在学习项目的同时执行听觉的 1 次回溯任务,其中分心物以固定或可变的间隔呈现。在实验 3 中,参与者学习具有高或低词频变化的刺激。在所有实验中,即使操纵轻微影响了后续的识别,σ 的估计值也不受我们试图操纵编码变化的影响。相反,σ 的估计值往往与新的和学习的项目之间的强度均值差异的估计值呈正相关(),这与如果 σ 通常与 成比例的情况相符。我们的结果表明,成功地操纵编码变化是非常困难的,这为其他试图检验编码变化假说的人提供了一个方向。

相似文献

7
Effects of pre-experimental knowledge on recognition memory.实验前知识对再认记忆的影响。
Learn Mem. 2010 Dec 16;18(1):11-4. doi: 10.1101/lm.1952111. Print 2011 Jan.
9
Retrieval dynamics of recognition and rejection.识别与排斥的检索动态
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Sep;72(9):2328-2341. doi: 10.1177/1747021819836753. Epub 2019 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Forgetting from lapses of sustained attention.因持续性注意力不集中而遗忘。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Apr;25(2):605-611. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1309-5.
2
The science of mind wandering: empirically navigating the stream of consciousness.心智游移的科学:从经验上驾驭意识流。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:487-518. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015331. Epub 2014 Sep 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验