Department of Industrial and Materials Science, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden; IMM Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden; Centre for Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Stockholm County Council, SE-113 65, Stockholm, Sweden.
IMM Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden; Centre for Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Stockholm County Council, SE-113 65, Stockholm, Sweden; School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SE-141 57, Huddinge, Sweden.
Appl Ergon. 2020 Apr;84:103025. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103025. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
Observation-based risk assessments are often used for evaluation of biomechanical workload and the condition of the workplace ergonomics. However, the inter- and intra-rater reliability of the methods used for the assessments are insufficiently studied. The OCRA checklist method, included as a reference method in the ISO and CEN standards regarding upper limb repetitive risk assessment, was in this study investigated regarding its reliability. Eleven ergonomists were educated within the method. Each ergonomist risk-assessed ten video-recorded manual work tasks, on two occasions. The average inter-rater agreement of the five overall risk levels was 39% and the linearly weighted kappa was 0.43, the intra-rater dittos were 45% and 0.52. Both indicating a moderate reliability, but lower than what could be expected. The levels might be sufficient for coarse surveys. However, for risk assessments before and after an intervention, complementing technical methods should be considered.
基于观察的风险评估常用于评估生物力学工作量和工作场所人机工程学的状况。然而,用于评估的方法的组内和组间可靠性研究不足。OCRA 清单方法被包含在 ISO 和 CEN 标准中,作为上肢重复性风险评估的参考方法,在本研究中对其可靠性进行了调查。11 名人体工程学家接受了该方法的培训。每位人体工程学家在两次评估中对十个视频记录的手动工作任务进行风险评估。五个总体风险水平的平均组间一致性为 39%,线性加权 Kappa 值为 0.43,组内一致性为 45%和 0.52。这两个值都表明可靠性为中等,但低于预期。这些水平可能足以进行粗略调查。然而,对于干预前后的风险评估,应考虑补充技术方法。