Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
NIHR Research Design Service, School of Health and Social Care, University of Essex, Colchester, Essex.
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Mar 26;70(693):e294-e302. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X708149. Print 2020 Apr.
Evidence about how primary care can best enable survivors of transient ischaemic attack (TIA)/stroke return to work is limited.
This study explored the role of primary care in supporting survivors of transient ischaemic attack (TIA)/stroke return to work with stakeholders from a local UK community.
A qualitative study using framework analysis.
Four focus groups were carried out in Cambridgeshire, UK, between September and November 2015. The 18 participants included survivors of TIA/stroke, carers, an employer representative, GPs, occupational therapists (OTs), and clinical commissioners.
There was a mismatch between patient and carer needs and what is provided by primary care. This included: lack of GP awareness of invisible impairments; uncertainty how primary care could help in time-limited consultations; and complexity of return-to-work issues. Primary care physicians were not aware of relevant services they could refer patients to, such as OT support. In addition, there was an overall lack of coordination between different stakeholders in the return-to-work process. Linking with other services was considered important but challenging because of ongoing changes in service structure and the commissioning model. Suggestions for improvement include: a central contact in primary care for signposting to available services; a rehabilitation assessment integrated with the electronic record; and a patient-held shared-care plan at discharge from stroke wards.
Improving the role for primary care in helping survivors of TIA/stroke return to work is challenging. However, primary care could play a central role in initiating/coordinating vocational rehabilitation. Through focus group discussions with stakeholders from a local community, patients, carers, and clinical commissioners were able to put forward concrete proposals to address the barriers identified.
关于初级保健如何最有效地帮助短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)/中风幸存者重返工作岗位的证据有限。
本研究旨在探讨初级保健在支持短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)/中风幸存者重返工作岗位方面的作用,研究对象为英国当地社区的利益相关者。
使用框架分析的定性研究。
2015 年 9 月至 11 月,在英国剑桥郡进行了 4 次焦点小组讨论。18 名参与者包括 TIA/中风幸存者、照顾者、雇主代表、全科医生、职业治疗师(OT)和临床专员。
患者和照顾者的需求与初级保健提供的服务之间存在不匹配。这包括:全科医生对无形损伤缺乏认识;在限时咨询中不确定初级保健如何提供帮助;以及重返工作岗位问题的复杂性。初级保健医生不知道他们可以转介患者去的相关服务,例如 OT 支持。此外,重返工作岗位过程中不同利益相关者之间缺乏整体协调。与其他服务建立联系被认为很重要,但由于服务结构和委托模式的持续变化,这具有挑战性。改进建议包括:在初级保健中设立一个中央联络点,用于将患者转介到可用服务;将康复评估与电子记录集成;以及在从中风病房出院时发放一份患者持有的共享护理计划。
改善初级保健在帮助 TIA/中风幸存者重返工作岗位方面的作用具有挑战性。然而,初级保健可以在启动/协调职业康复方面发挥核心作用。通过与当地社区的利益相关者、患者、照顾者和临床专员进行焦点小组讨论,能够提出具体建议来解决确定的障碍。