• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Informing Policy Change: A Study of Rapid Repeat Pregnancy in Adolescents to Increase Access to Immediate Postpartum Contraception.推动政策变革:青少年快速重复妊娠研究以增加即时产后避孕措施的可及性。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Jun;29(6):815-818. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.8122. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
2
Postpartum contraception: initiation and effectiveness in a large universal healthcare system.产后避孕:大型全民医疗保健系统中的起始情况与有效性
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;217(1):55.e1-55.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.036. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
3
Coverage of immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception has improved birth intervals for at-risk populations.立即产后长效可逆避孕措施的覆盖范围改善了高危人群的生育间隔。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;222(4S):S886.e1-S886.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1282. Epub 2019 Dec 14.
4
Factors associated with postpartum use of long-acting reversible contraception.与产后使用长效可逆避孕措施相关的因素。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jul;221(1):43.e1-43.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
5
Choice of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device, etonogestrel implant or depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception after aspiration abortion.人工流产后避孕选择左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器、依托孕烯植入剂或醋酸甲羟孕酮长效避孕针。
Contraception. 2015 Dec;92(6):553-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.06.013. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
6
Effect of contraceptive choice on rapid repeat pregnancy.避孕方法选择对重复快速妊娠的影响。
Contraception. 2019 Mar;99(3):184-186. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.11.008. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
7
Etonogestrel-Releasing Contraceptive Implant for Postpartum Adolescents: A Randomized Controlled Trial.产后青少年使用依托孕烯释放型避孕植入剂:一项随机对照试验。
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2017 Jun;30(3):389-394. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
8
Contraception Insurance Coverage and Receipt of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception or Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate on the Day of Abortion.避孕保险覆盖范围以及堕胎当天长效可逆避孕法或醋酸甲羟孕酮注射液的使用情况。
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;130(1):109-117. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002070.
9
ENG-releasing subdermal implants in postpartum teenagers - an open-label trial study protocol.产后青少年中释放促性腺激素释放激素的皮下植入物——一项开放标签试验研究方案
Reprod Health. 2020 Jun 23;17(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-00952-5.
10
Long-acting reversible contraceptive acceptability and unintended pregnancy among women presenting for short-acting methods: a randomized patient preference trial.采用短效避孕方法的女性对长效可逆避孕方法的接受度及意外妊娠情况:一项随机患者偏好试验
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Feb;216(2):101-109. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.08.033. Epub 2016 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Championing reproductive and perinatal health with the recovery community: improving access to healthcare and health promotion resources to support recovery.与康复社区共同倡导生殖与围产期健康:改善医疗保健和健康促进资源的可及性,以支持康复。
Front Public Health. 2025 May 14;13:1529169. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1529169. eCollection 2025.
2
Intervals and Outcomes of First and Second Pregnancies in Low-Income Women: A Record-Linkage Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study.低收入妇女首次和第二次妊娠的间隔和结局:基于记录链接的纵向前瞻性队列研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2021 Jun 25;27:e931596. doi: 10.12659/MSM.931596.
3
Provision and Guidance for Postpartum Contraception - Ensuring Reproductive Rights during Times of Crises.产后避孕的提供与指导——在危机时期确保生殖权利
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2021 Apr;43(4):247-249. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1729985. Epub 2021 May 12.
4
Acceptability of ENG-releasing subdermal implants among postpartum Brazilian young women during the COVID-19 pandemic.ENG 释药皮下埋植剂在 COVID-19 大流行期间在巴西年轻产后女性中的可接受性。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Jul;154(1):106-112. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13663. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
5
Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2018.堕胎监测报告—美国,2018 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2020 Nov 27;69(7):1-29. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6907a1.

本文引用的文献

1
Policy change is not enough: engaging provider champions on immediate postpartum contraception.政策改变还不够:让提供者成为立即产后避孕的拥护者。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;218(6):590.e1-590.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.03.007. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
2
Twelve-month contraceptive continuation and repeat pregnancy among young mothers choosing postdelivery contraceptive implants or postplacental intrauterine devices.选择产后避孕植入物或胎盘娩出后宫内节育器的年轻母亲的12个月避孕持续率及再次妊娠情况
Contraception. 2016 Feb;93(2):178-83. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
3
Advocating for immediate postpartum LARC: increasing access, improving outcomes, and decreasing cost.提倡产后即时长效可逆避孕法:增加可及性、改善结局并降低成本。
Contraception. 2014 Nov;90(5):468-71. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.001. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
4
The effect of long-acting reversible contraception on rapid repeat pregnancy in adolescents: a review.长效可逆避孕措施对青少年反复快速妊娠的影响:综述。
J Adolesc Health. 2013 Apr;52(4 Suppl):S47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.10.278.
5
Postpartum contraceptive use among adolescent mothers in seven states.七个州青少年母亲产后避孕措施使用情况。
J Adolesc Health. 2013 Mar;52(3):278-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 Jun 23.
6
Rapid repeat pregnancy in adolescents: do immediate postpartum contraceptive implants make a difference?青少年快速重复妊娠:即时产后避孕植入物是否有影响?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jun;206(6):481.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.04.015. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
7
From research to health policy impact.从研究到卫生政策影响。
Health Serv Res. 2012 Feb;47(1 Pt 2):337-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01374.x.
8
Bias-reduced and separation-proof conditional logistic regression with small or sparse data sets.具有小数据集或稀疏数据集的偏倚降低和分离证明的条件逻辑回归。
Stat Med. 2010 Mar 30;29(7-8):770-7. doi: 10.1002/sim.3794.
9
Barriers to intrauterine device insertion in postpartum women.产后妇女宫内节育器放置的障碍
Contraception. 2005 Dec;72(6):426-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.05.016. Epub 2005 Aug 9.

推动政策变革:青少年快速重复妊娠研究以增加即时产后避孕措施的可及性。

Informing Policy Change: A Study of Rapid Repeat Pregnancy in Adolescents to Increase Access to Immediate Postpartum Contraception.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.

出版信息

J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Jun;29(6):815-818. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.8122. Epub 2020 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1089/jwh.2019.8122
PMID:31990605
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7476390/
Abstract

Rapid repeat pregnancy (RRP) is common among adolescents and is associated with adverse maternal and infant outcomes. Despite evidence that use of long-acting forms of contraception before hospital discharge can help minimize RRP rates, barriers to placement existed within the state of Indiana. We sought to determine state-specific RRP and induced abortion rates for adolescents based on chosen postpartum contraception to inform policy change. We examined a retrospective cohort of 227 adolescents (ages 12-18 years) who gave birth in Indiana between 2010 and 2012. Demographics, postpartum contraception, and subsequent pregnancies or abortions after the sentinel delivery were obtained. Rates of RRP based on type of immediate postpartum contraception, etonogestrel (ENG) contraceptive implant, depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) injection, and short-acting methods were compared. Bivariate and logistic regression analyses were conducted. RRP rates were 3.7% for those with ENG contraceptive implant, 22.6% for those with DMPA, and 39.1% for those who choose short-acting methods ( = 0.01). Adolescents who did not choose an ENG contraceptive implant were significantly more likely to have an RRP (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 11.8, 95% confidence interval: 2.74-110.3), compared with other contraceptive methods, even after adjusting for covariates such as age, prior pregnancies, and postpartum visit attendance. Immediate postpartum receipt of ENG implant was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of RRP in adolescents in Indiana. These data facilitated state policy change regarding insurance reimbursement to improve statewide access for all women, regardless of age, showing how local data can inform policy change.

摘要

快速重复妊娠(RRP)在青少年中很常见,与母婴不良结局有关。尽管有证据表明,在出院前使用长效避孕形式可以帮助降低 RRP 率,但印第安纳州存在着避孕措施的实施障碍。我们旨在根据产后选择的避孕方法来确定青少年的特定州 RRP 和人工流产率,以告知政策的改变。我们研究了一个回顾性队列,其中包括 2010 年至 2012 年在印第安纳州分娩的 227 名青少年(年龄 12-18 岁)。获取了人口统计学、产后避孕以及分娩后再次怀孕或人工流产的信息。根据即时产后避孕方法、依托孕诺酮(ENG)避孕植入物、地诺孕素醋酸酯(DMPA)注射和短效方法的类型比较 RRP 的发生率。进行了单变量和逻辑回归分析。ENG 避孕植入物的 RRP 发生率为 3.7%,DMPA 为 22.6%,短效方法为 39.1%(P=0.01)。与其他避孕方法相比,选择 ENG 避孕植入物的青少年 RRP 发生率明显更低(调整后的优势比[aOR]为 11.8,95%置信区间:2.74-110.3),即使在调整了年龄、既往妊娠和产后就诊等协变量后也是如此。印第安纳州青少年产后即刻接受 ENG 植入物与 RRP 发生率降低显著相关。这些数据促成了州政策的改变,以改善全州范围内所有妇女的保险报销,无论年龄大小,展示了如何利用本地数据来推动政策的改变。