Owusu Enid, Newman Mercy Jemima
Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, School of Biomedical and Allied Health Sciences, University of Ghana, P.O. Box LG 25, Accra, Ghana.
Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Ghana Medical School, University of Ghana, P.O. Box LG 25, Accra, Ghana.
Med Sci (Basel). 2020 Jan 25;8(1):5. doi: 10.3390/medsci8010005.
(1) Background: Present methods for drug susceptibility tests (DST) rely on culture methods that are sophisticated and relatively faster, or a slow and cheaper option. These methods frustrate disease control; therefore, there is a need for methods that incorporate key functions of microscopy and culture, with reduced cost burden and sophistry. Thus, the purpose of this study was to identify which, among the most commonly used (in Ghana) methods, can conveniently be used at health centers located in rural areas for effective DST determination of (). (2) Methods: isolates were tested for their susceptibility to streptomycin, isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol (SIRE), and pyrazinamide by microscopic observation drug susceptibility (MODS) and BACTEC MGIT 960 methods. Evaluations were based on shorter turnaround periods, rapidity, ease of use, cost, etc. A comparative analysis was statistically expressed as kappa values. (3) Results: Endpoints for drug susceptibilities by MODS averaged 13 days (7-32), whilst that for BACTEC MGIT 960 was 10 days with a further 12 days to detect resistance. Therefore, a turnaround period of 22 days was needed for DST by BACTEC MGIT 960, compared to 13 days for MODS. There were differences in correlation levels between the two methods, as determined by their kappa values. (4) Conclusion: The MODS assay was found to be less costly, more user-friendly, and still able to be conveniently used at health centers located in rural areas known to be endemic for TB, particularly in Ghana.
(1) 背景:目前的药物敏感性试验(DST)方法依赖于复杂且相对快速的培养方法,或者是缓慢且成本较低的方法。这些方法阻碍了疾病控制;因此,需要结合显微镜检查和培养关键功能的方法,同时减轻成本负担和复杂性。因此,本研究的目的是确定在(加纳)最常用的方法中,哪些能够方便地在农村地区的卫生中心用于有效地进行()的DST测定。(2) 方法:通过显微镜观察药物敏感性(MODS)和BACTEC MGIT 960方法,对分离株进行链霉素、异烟肼、利福平、乙胺丁醇(SIRE)和吡嗪酰胺的敏感性测试。评估基于较短的周转时间、快速性、易用性、成本等。比较分析以kappa值进行统计学表达。(3) 结果:MODS法的药物敏感性终点平均为13天(7 - 32天),而BACTEC MGIT 960法为10天,检测耐药性还需12天。因此,BACTEC MGIT 960法进行DST需要22天的周转时间,而MODS法为13天。根据kappa值确定,两种方法的相关性水平存在差异。(4) 结论:发现MODS检测成本更低、更便于用户使用,并且仍然能够方便地在已知结核病流行的农村地区的卫生中心使用,特别是在加纳。