Elmhurst College.
Penn State University Abington.
J Soc Psychol. 2020 Sep 2;160(5):603-612. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2020.1719962. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
Few studies have replicated and extended the classic mimicry → liking effect. The present research sought to (a) replicate the affiliative consequences of mimicry; (b) test whether the affiliative consequences hold in a context where mimicry may not be normative (i.e., cross-race interactions); and (c) investigate how excluded individuals respond to same- versus cross-race mimicry and non-mimicry. Participants wrote about a control topic or social exclusion and then engaged in a brief laboratory interaction in which they were mimicked or not mimicked by a confederate who was either same-race or cross-race. Then they reported how much they liked the confederate. Within the control condition, the effect of mimicry on affiliation depended on the race of the confederate - but this pattern did not emerge for excluded individuals. The study was unable to conclusively replicate and extend previous findings. The authors make recommendations to promote a more cumulative science of behavioral mimicry.
很少有研究能够复制和扩展经典的模仿→喜欢效应。本研究旨在:(a) 复制模仿的亲和后果;(b) 检验在模仿可能不规范的情况下(即跨种族互动),这种亲和后果是否成立;(c) 研究被排斥的个体如何对同种族和跨种族的模仿和非模仿做出反应。参与者先就一个控制主题或社会排斥进行写作,然后与一个同种族或跨种族的同伙进行短暂的实验室互动,在互动中,参与者被同伙模仿或没有被模仿。然后,他们报告了自己有多喜欢这个同伙。在控制条件下,模仿对亲和力的影响取决于同伙的种族——但对于被排斥的个体来说,这种模式并没有出现。该研究未能确定地复制和扩展之前的发现。作者提出了一些建议,以促进行为模仿的更具累积性的科学研究。