Suppr超能文献

英国新生儿惊厥的调查与管理:解释性序贯混合方法研究。

Investigating and managing neonatal seizures in the UK: an explanatory sequential mixed methods approach.

机构信息

University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK.

Department of Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, 385a Glossop Road, Sheffield, S10 2HQ, UK.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2020 Jan 28;20(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-1918-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neonatal seizures are difficult to diagnose and, when they are, tradition dictates first line treatment is phenobarbital. There is little data on how consultants diagnose neonatal seizures, choose when to treat or how they choose aetiological investigations or drug treatments. The purpose of this study was to assess the variation across the UK in the management of neonatal seizures and explore paediatricians' views on their diagnosis and treatment.

METHODS

An explanatory sequential mixed methods approach was used (QUAN→QUAL) with equal waiting between stages. We collected quantitative data from neonatology staff and paediatric neurologists using a questionnaire sent to neonatal units and via emails from the British Paediatric Neurology Association. We asked for copies of neonatal unit guidelines on the management of seizures. The data from questionnaires was used to identify16 consultants using semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was used to interpret qualitative data, which was triangulated with quantitative questionnaire data.

RESULTS

One hundred questionnaires were returned: 47.7% thought levetiracetam was as, or equally, effective as phenobarbital; 9.2% thought it was less effective. 79.6% of clinicians had seen no side effects in neonates with levetiracetam. 97.8% of unit guidelines recommended phenobarbital first line, with wide variation in subsequent drug choice, aetiological investigations, and advice on when to start treatment. Thematic analysis revealed three themes: 'Managing uncertainty with neonatal seizures', 'Moving practice forward' and 'Multidisciplinary team working'. Consultants noted collecting evidence on anti-convulsant drugs in neonates is problematic, and recommended a number of solutions, including collaboration to reach consensus guidelines, to reduce diagnostic and management uncertainty.

CONCLUSIONS

There is wide variation in the management of neonatal seizures and clinicians face many uncertainties. Our data has helped reveal some of the reasons for current practice and decision making. Suggestions to improve certainty include: educational initiatives to improve the ability of neonatal staff to describe suspicious events, greater use of video, closer working between neonatologists and neurologists, further research, and a national discussion to reach a consensus on a standardised approach to managing neonatal epileptic seizures.

摘要

背景

新生儿癫痫的诊断较为困难,而传统的一线治疗方法是苯巴比妥。关于顾问如何诊断新生儿癫痫、何时开始治疗以及如何选择病因学检查或药物治疗,相关数据很少。本研究旨在评估英国在新生儿癫痫管理方面的差异,并探讨儿科医生对其诊断和治疗的看法。

方法

采用解释性序贯混合方法(QUAN→QUAL),各阶段等待时间相等。我们使用问卷从新生儿科工作人员和儿科神经科医生那里收集定量数据,并通过英国儿科神经病学协会的电子邮件收集数据。我们要求提供新生儿单位管理癫痫发作的指南副本。从问卷中获得的数据用于识别 16 名顾问,采用半结构化访谈。使用主题分析解释定性数据,并将其与定量问卷数据进行三角剖分。

结果

共收回 100 份问卷:47.7%的人认为左乙拉西坦与苯巴比妥同样有效或更有效;9.2%的人认为它的效果较差。79.6%的临床医生在使用左乙拉西坦的新生儿中未观察到副作用。97.8%的单位指南建议将苯巴比妥作为一线治疗药物,随后的药物选择、病因学检查以及何时开始治疗的建议存在广泛差异。主题分析揭示了三个主题:“管理新生儿癫痫的不确定性”、“推进实践”和“多学科团队合作”。顾问们指出,在新生儿中收集抗惊厥药物的证据存在问题,并提出了一些解决方案,包括合作达成共识指南,以减少诊断和管理的不确定性。

结论

新生儿癫痫的管理存在广泛差异,临床医生面临许多不确定性。我们的数据有助于揭示一些当前实践和决策的原因。建议通过以下方式提高确定性:教育举措以提高新生儿工作人员描述可疑事件的能力,更多地使用视频,神经科医生和神经科医生之间更紧密的合作,进一步的研究,以及全国性的讨论,以就管理新生儿癫痫发作的标准化方法达成共识。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/551d/6986085/2f4fd7f71b95/12887_2020_1918_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验