Suppr超能文献

在适当选择的患者中,初次全膝关节置换术后屈曲不稳定的单纯聚乙烯嵌体置换可获得优异的结果。

Isolated Polyethylene Insert Exchange for Flexion Instability After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Demonstrated Excellent Results in Properly Selected Patients.

机构信息

Division of Orthopaedic Trauma & Complex Adult Reconstruction, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, Florida.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2020 May;35(5):1328-1332. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.01.006. Epub 2020 Jan 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Historically, isolated polyethylene exchange (IPE) for flexion instability after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has demonstrated generally poor and unpredictable results. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the results of a single surgeon's strict indications and protocol for IPE for flexion instability after primary TKA.

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2016, 418 revision TKAs were performed by the senior author. Patients were considered for IPE if they demonstrated excellent radiographic alignment and component positioning preoperatively. Intraoperatively, if component rotation, sizing, and fixation were all excellent and the flexion and extension gaps could be balanced, then IPE was performed. We retrospectively reviewed 31 knees in 30 patients who were treated with IPE specifically for flexion instability after primary TKA. The mean follow-up was 41 months (range, 24-85 months). Nineteen knees were cruciate-retaining TKAs revised to a more constrained "deep-dish" ultracongruent insert, and 12 posterior-stabilized TKAs were revised to thicker posterior-stabilized insert.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 41 months, only 2 of 31 knees (6.5%) required subsequent component revision surgery for recurrent instability. Knee Society pain scores improved from 70 preoperatively to 86 postoperatively (P < .0001), and function scores improved from 39 points preoperatively to 44 points postoperatively (P = .015).

CONCLUSION

IPE for flexion instability in carefully selected patients was successful in over 90% of patients for a mean follow-up of 41 months. Pain and function scores significantly improved. Longer-term follow-up is necessary to determine whether these results are durable over time.

摘要

背景

在全膝关节置换术(TKA)后,孤立性聚乙烯置换(IPE)治疗膝关节屈曲不稳定的历史结果通常较差且不可预测。本研究的目的是评估一位外科医生对初次 TKA 后膝关节屈曲不稳定患者严格选择适应证和应用 IPE 方案的治疗结果。

方法

2009 年至 2016 年,作者共完成 418 例翻修 TKA。如果患者术前影像学表现出良好的对线和假体位置,将考虑进行 IPE。术中,如果假体旋转、尺寸和固定都良好,并且可以平衡屈伸间隙,则进行 IPE。我们回顾性分析了 30 例 31 膝接受初次 TKA 后因膝关节屈曲不稳定而接受 IPE 治疗的患者。平均随访时间为 41 个月(范围 24-85 个月)。19 例为行交叉韧带保留 TKA 翻修的患者,置换为更具约束性的“深碟形”超高分子聚乙烯衬垫;12 例为行后稳定型 TKA 翻修的患者,置换为更厚的后稳定型聚乙烯衬垫。

结果

平均随访 41 个月时,仅 2 例(6.5%)因再次出现不稳定而需要行翻修手术。膝关节协会评分从术前的 70 分提高到术后的 86 分(P <.0001),功能评分从术前的 39 分提高到术后的 44 分(P =.015)。

结论

在精心选择的患者中,对于膝关节屈曲不稳定,IPE 的成功率超过 90%,平均随访时间为 41 个月。疼痛和功能评分均显著改善。需要进行更长时间的随访以确定这些结果是否具有长期耐久性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验