BACKGROUND

Isolated polyethylene insert exchange (IPIE) has not been established as a treatment option for hyperextension instability after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of the study was to evaluate the survival rate and clinical outcomes of IPIE for the treatment of instability with or without hyperextension after TKA.

METHODS

This study retrospectively reviewed 46 patients who underwent IPIE for symptomatic prosthetic knee instability by dividing them into 2 groups based on the presence of hyperextension (without for group I and with for group IH). Patient demographics, clinical scores, radiographic data, range of motion (ROM), and surgical information were collected. Clinical failure was defined as a subsequent surgery following IPIE for any reason. The survival rate of IPIE and differences in demographics, clinical scores, and ROM were compared.

RESULTS

There were 46 patients (91% were women) with an average age of 70.1 years and a mean follow-up of 44.8 months. The average time between primary TKA and IPIE surgery was 6.5 ± 4.2 years, and during IPIE, 2 out of the 8 cruciate-retaining inserts were converted to "deep-dish" ultracongruent inserts while the insert thickness increased from 11.9 ± 1.8 mm to 17.1 ± 3.1 mm. After IPIE surgery, a significantly thicker tibial insert was used in the group with hyperextension (15.39 ± 2.4 mm for group I, 18.3 ± 2.9 mm for group IH; < 0.001 by independent -test), and no significant differences were observed in the ROM and clinical scores before and after IPIE between the 2 groups. The overall survival rate for IPIE was 83% at 5 years and 57% at 10 years, and there were no statistically significant differences between the groups using the Cox proportional hazards regression model.

CONCLUSIONS

IPIE demonstrated an overall survival rate of 83% at 5 years with no difference in the recurrence of instability regardless of hyperextension. This study highlighted the effectiveness of using thicker inserts to resolve instability without significant differences in the ROM or clinical scores between the groups, suggesting its potential as a decision-making reference for surgeons.