Suppr超能文献

严重和难治性低氧血症机械通气的早期程序化方法的临床效果。

The Clinical Effect of an Early, Protocolized Approach to Mechanical Ventilation for Severe and Refractory Hypoxemia.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Department of Respiratory Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2020 Apr;65(4):413-419. doi: 10.4187/respcare.07243. Epub 2020 Jan 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

ARDS remains a source of significant morbidity and mortality in the critically ill patient. The mainstay of therapy entails invasive mechanical ventilation utilizing a lung-protective strategy designed to limit lung injury associated with excessive stress and strain while the underlying etiology of respiratory failure is identified and treated. Less is understood about what to do once conventional ventilation parameters have been optimized but the patient's respiratory status remains unchanged or worsens. In 2015, a protocolized, stepwise approach to mechanical ventilation with partially automated and clearly defined thresholds for management changes was implemented at our institution. We hypothesized that, by identifying appropriate patients earlier, time-to-escalation and rescue therapy implementation would be shortened.

METHODS

Subjects with severe ARDS, treated with prone positioning based on our institution's protocolized approach from December 2013 to August 2016 were included. Their baseline characteristics, severity of illness scores, and mechanical ventilation parameters were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics, tidal volumes, P F , duration of ventilation after proning, and mortality were similar in both groups. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) PEEP at the time of proning was higher after the protocol implementation (12.5 cm HO [IQR 6.5-19.4] vs 18 cm HO [IQR 10-22], = .386), and mean (IQR) respiratory system driving pressure was lower (16 cm HO [IQR 13-36.2] vs 12 cm HO [IQR 9-19.6], = .029). Median (IQR) time from refractory hypoxemia identification to proning was shorter after protocol implementation (42.2 h [IQR 6.83-347.2] vs 16.3 h [IQR 1-99.7], = .02), and P F at 1 h after proning was higher. ICU and hospital LOS were shorter after the protocol implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Following the implementation of an early, evidence-based, protocolized approach to optimizing mechanical ventilation, subjects with true refractory hypoxemia were identified earlier and time to proning was significantly shorter. Despite improvement in the evaluation and management of refractory hypoxemia as well as time to initiation of prone positioning, mortality was unchanged and there was variation in the duration of the position.

摘要

背景

ARDS 仍然是危重病患者发病率和死亡率的主要原因。治疗的主要方法是使用肺保护性策略进行有创机械通气,以限制与过度压力和应变相关的肺损伤,同时确定和治疗呼吸衰竭的根本病因。对于一旦优化了常规通气参数但患者的呼吸状况仍然不变或恶化的情况,了解得就较少了。2015 年,我们机构实施了一种机械通气的程序化、逐步方法,该方法部分自动化,并为管理变化设定了明确的阈值。我们假设,通过更早地识别合适的患者,可缩短升级和抢救治疗的实施时间。

方法

纳入了 2013 年 12 月至 2016 年 8 月期间根据我们机构的程序化方法接受俯卧位治疗的严重 ARDS 患者。收集并分析了他们的基线特征、疾病严重程度评分和机械通气参数。

结果

两组患者的基线特征、潮气量、P F 、俯卧位通气后的持续时间和死亡率相似。俯卧位时的中位(四分位距[IQR])PEEP 在方案实施后更高(12.5 cm HO [IQR 6.5-19.4] vs 18 cm HO [IQR 10-22], =.386),平均(IQR)呼吸驱动压更低(16 cm HO [IQR 13-36.2] vs 12 cm HO [IQR 9-19.6], =.029)。从难治性低氧血症确定到俯卧位的中位(IQR)时间在方案实施后更短(42.2 h [IQR 6.83-347.2] vs 16.3 h [IQR 1-99.7], =.02),并且俯卧位 1 小时后的 P F 更高。实施方案后 ICU 和住院 LOS 更短。

结论

在实施了一种早期、基于证据的机械通气优化程序化方法后,真正难治性低氧血症患者更早地被识别出来,俯卧位的时间明显缩短。尽管难治性低氧血症的评估和管理以及开始俯卧位的时间有所改善,但死亡率没有变化,并且体位持续时间存在差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验