The University of Auckland.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2020 Mar;113(2):340-362. doi: 10.1002/jeab.581. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
In research on timing, reinforcers often are assumed to influence discrimination of elapsed time. We asked whether changes in choice used to measure timing arise because of joint control by elapsed time and reinforcers, rather than from the direct modification of control by elapsed time by reinforcers. Pigeons worked on a concurrent-choice task in which 1 response was 9 times more likely to produce a reinforcer, reversing between locations when 19 s had elapsed since the marker event. Across conditions, we manipulated the percentage of reinforcers arranged before the probability reversal from 5 to 95%. These changes in reinforcer percentages altered control by location-based elements of the contingency, but not by time-based elements. Choice was well described by a model that assumes that control by the contingency is weakened by generalization across the time and location of reinforcers, and that these generalizations become more likely at later times since a marker. These findings add to a growing body of research that suggests that reinforcers share the same function as other environmental events in determining how the environment controls behavior.
在关于时间的研究中,强化物通常被认为会影响对经过时间的辨别。我们想知道,用于衡量时间的选择变化是否是因为经过时间和强化物的共同控制,而不是因为强化物直接改变了经过时间的控制。鸽子在一个同时进行选择的任务中工作,其中一个反应产生强化物的可能性是另一个反应的 9 倍,当标记事件发生后 19 秒,反应位置会反转。在不同条件下,我们改变了从 5%到 95%的强化物的出现比例。这些强化物出现比例的变化改变了基于位置的环境关联的控制,而不是基于时间的环境关联的控制。一个模型很好地描述了选择,该模型假设,强化物在时间和位置上的泛化削弱了对环境关联的控制,而且这些泛化在标记后更有可能发生。这些发现增加了越来越多的研究,这些研究表明,强化物与其他环境事件具有相同的功能,决定着环境如何控制行为。